Do you believe in survival of the fittest? Moreover, if the elite plan to reduce world population by 95%, does it even matter what you believe?

[Kelley1]

In evolution, the fittest are the survivors. In the event of supervolcano or an asteroid hit, the survivors are lucky ones the lived the furthest away. For most of human history, the survivors were the leaders, the smartest, the richest, and, in war, the most technically advanced. That would apply to the elite, should they choose to eliminate most of us, the useless eaters. None of us want to be killed or otherwise eliminated. However, it the big scheme of things that may not matter. The elite, their minions, and their children would survive after which the human race would on average be more intelligent and improve slightly.

From 7 Billion To 500 Million Is The Population Culling Agenda Of The Elite

Is that a conspiracy theory? A conspiracy theories are truths the elite are trying to hide.

In recent years, the UN and other international organizations have become bolder about trying to push the population control agenda of the global elite. Most of the time organizations such as the UN will simply talk about “stabilizing” the global population, but there are many among the global elite that are not afraid to openly talk about a goal of reducing the population of the world to 500 million (or less).

To you and I it may seem like insanity to want to get rid of more than 90 percent of the global population, but there is a growing consensus among the global elite that this is absolutely necessary for the good of the planet.

So what precisely is considered to be an ideal population for the earth by those pushing “sustainable development”?

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

CNN Founder Ted Turner would go even farther:

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First, says that reducing our population down to 100 million is one of his three main goals.

[FreyaRed]

Elites want slaves. Enslaved population isn't a contradictory to reduced population. Not all ethnics are usable as slaves but have other attributes like intelligence and creativity. That's why elites want to create hybrids without any ethnocentric ambitions and IQ around 100. More IQ is bad for them because uncontrollable, less makes those individuals incapable to do more complex tasks.
Of course elites by themselves avoid hybridization with human subspecies which didn't create a dominant culture like Europeans or East Asians.

[Jennz6]

Yes, sounds right to me

[Jennz6]

@Kelley1
Thanks so very much for the MHO 💕

[SixFootSexy]

These Malthusian globalists are serving a dark lord. In fact, they're doing the opposite of what would make a more bountiful and wonderful world. Even more so, if we're able to use AI for good.

"Superabundance by Tupy and Pooley presents a refreshing and optimistic take on the future of economic growth. Its central message—that technological progress and human creativity can turn perceived limitations into boundless opportunities—offers an inspiring counterpoint to more pessimistic views on resource scarcity. Whether you are an economist, policymaker, or simply curious about the future of human progress, the book provides a compelling argument for why the future may be more abundant than many fear."

[Gwendoline]

I remember watching a documentary about the bumkers and escape plans the elites have. All i could think watching if was if it ever happened the first thing that would happen is their security kills them to get into the bunker or the guy operating the fast boat in new York that will evacuate a billionaire if something happens, we'll the boat guy isn't likely going to wait.

[DJB72]

It depends how you define the fittest.

Just because the Davos fucktards have money doesn't mean they'd survive. They can't farm. They need the people they look down on or they'll be the first to starve.

For oppressed, hungry people there's always options...

Look up Dutch 1672

[DrPepper12]

Yes to darwinism

No to elite culling conspiracy

Yes to we do need to get our population down. Even as high as 2-3 billion would be a VAST improvement!!

[AviatorTom]

In evolution, it's not the fittest that survive, its the ones that best adapt to their surroundings that have a better chance for survival, and for passing their genes on to their offspring.

[Kelley1]

In evolution, by definition, the fittest are the survivors. regardless of the reason. Typ

In evolution, by definition, the fittest are the survivors regardless of the reasons. Typically, the smartest, the strongest, and and others best able to adapt to their environment.

[exitseven]

There are definitely too many people on the planet. When we run out of drinking water things will get interesting.

[DryGermanGuy]

Will not likely happen. 70% of Earth‘s surface is water and desalination is a standard technology today.

[Dargil]

How do they intend to do that. We have to let it happen. It will take military control and disarmament. USA won't cooperate. Islamists won't cooperate. How many Divisions do Davos, the Chatting Classes and WEF have?

[Kelley1]

Throughout all human recorded history and even before, the elite have always had control. Jew rules the U. S. congress and president and the federal reserve rules the USA.

[Dargil]

Throughout all human recorded history and even before, the elite disarmed the peasants. We have 400 million privately owned firearms in the USA. Davos, the Chatting Classes and WEF are what we call A Target Rich Environment. We ARE the fittest. If necessary we will pile them up like sandbags. My Winchester 94 with a laser sight is leaning against my bedroom wall loaded and chambered. C'mon in!

[hahahmm]

Funny how people know the elite want to reduce world population yet deny the possibility that the elite want to start WWIII.

[jamesgoldman]

Sure, they're cooking up something big

A new virus or plain old nuclear weapons

[DryGermanGuy]

There are no elites, no globalists and no idiotic plans to reduce the populations.

[TwoToTooTutu2]

No, the main doomsday cult is nowhere near powerful enough to really do anything. There have been a few high profile gnostics, but even then.

[RedInnocent69]

Probably not. Although the elite isn’t always the fittest. Often just the luckiest, and takes care of their own

[standardguy]

As a Christian I am against evolution ideology. Survival of the fittest is Nazi ideology. Not the fittest must survive but the morally best. And moral is based in the Bible.

[DrPepper12]

So you support murder, incest, genocide, bestiality among other unsavory things?

[Dongie]

No. That's the reason for laws and law enforcement.

[beefcakebradybatson]

Hitler would be OH, SO PROUD !!!

[Bklynbadboy12]

Yep I sure do

[jimmy2]

WWW III sure will