Why do movements ignore male victims when men are most affected, like in police violence, but highlight women when they’re the minority of victims?

This question points to a pattern in social justice movements where the gender breakdown of victims is often overlooked. For example, in cases of police violence, the vast majority of victims are men — particularly Black men — yet the public messaging rarely emphasizes this. Instead, phrases like “Black women’s lives matter” are sometimes used to ensure women are not forgotten, even when they are statistically less affected. The concern is that if women made up 99% of victims, the movement would likely center them explicitly, but male victims are often generalized under broader terms. This may reflect a cultural bias where male suffering is normalized or not seen as needing specific advocacy.
Why do movements ignore male victims when men are most affected, like in police violence, but highlight women when they’re the minority of victims?
Post Opinion