Whatever happens in Iran, do you pledge to interpret in a way that makes Trump's look like a failure?

Question

Instead of objectively analyzing all of the facts on a rational, consistent manner, do you pledge to spin Iran in a way unfavorable to Trump?

Lliam · Accepted Answer

I have already analyzed it objectively and rationally and surveyed the pros and cons.

Israel has been massacring innocent people for decades. It has been bombing and invading other countries for years.
It initiated an unprovoked bombing campaign against Iran. Iran finally responded to Israel's aggression. Now Trump comes in and attacks Iran based on Israeli lies about a nuclear arms program.

Even the U. S. National Security Agency UNAIEA says there is no evidence that Iran was developing Nukes. Iran is a signatory to the nonproliferation treaty and allows inspections of its facilities.

Israel has hundreds of undeclared nukes, ICBMs and enrichment facilities. It is not a signatory to the nonproliferation treaty and does not allow inspections.

Whenever Israel commits a criminal act, it says it is just defending itself. Does anyone. else have a right to defend themselves against Israeli aggression?

Israel calls Iran a terrorist state because it supports Palestinians and doesn't think Israel has a right to exist. But which country is the real terrorist? After all, Israel was founded on terrorism and hasn't let up for 77 years.

I would say that Trump is stupid. But, in reality, he is just Israel's bitch. And he is willing to squander American wealth and lives because Israel tell him to.

I voted for Trump in 2020 and 2024. (I voted independent in 2016.)
But Trump screwed the pooch on this one. He proved that he is more loyal to Israel than to the USA. Or maybe Israel is holding information that would destroy him if released.

Either way, Trump's legacy is over.

FunkyMonkee · Accepted Answer

From Ariel on X:
1. Trump’s action falls within his constitutional Commander-in-Chief powers, reinforced by the 2001 AUMF, negating the need for new congressional approval.
2. The strike is a preemptive measure against Iran’s advanced nuclear program, not a outright war declaration.
3. Congressional war votes, tainted by past deception, underscore the reliability of executive action in this instance.
4. The strike eliminated Iran’s nuclear threat, aligning with decades of U. S. policy, without triggering global conflict.
Vladimir Putin
Xi Jinping
Both know Donald Trump has the legal authority to carry this out. As it was not done under any false pretense.
Do you remember this?
Trump’s drone attack on Qasem Soleimani, authorized under the 2001 AUMF, was deemed constitutional by the 6th Circuit Court in 2021, reinforcing executive discretion.
Did this start WW3?
Do people not realize how powerful Qasem Soleimani was?
Ask yourself why there was no retaliation when Donald Trump took him out vs the nuclear strikes?
Representative Thomas Massie, in his June 21, 2025, statement argued the strike required congressional approval under Article I, Section 8, calling it an unconstitutional overreach and implying war initiation.
The strike was a targeted operation, not a war declaration. The War Powers Resolution (1973) allows 60 days of military action without congressional approval if the President certifies an imminent threat, which Trump did via a classified memo to Congress.
Why don't you hear any of this from Thomas Massie?

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

Trump makes himself look like a failure all by himself.

exitseven · Answer

I try and look at all sides of a situation. I also like to run through my head what the fake news would be saying if it was a democrat that bombed the hell out if Iran.

msc545 · Answer

Objectively the attack on Iran was a failure.

Chazmatazz269 · Answer

😂😂😂

Anonymous · Answer

Biden has dementia. 😂😂

Whatever happens in Iran, do you pledge to interpret in a way that makes Trump's look like a failure?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Do you approve of how Trump is handling Iran right now?