Yes
No
Yes / No BUT... I'll explain
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Nah. Red States will just rig the census reporting. Congressional redistricting should be done by a single independent 3rd party and approved by federal courts outside each individual state. Take the corrupt state legislatures out of the process entirely. The independent 3rd party should have their financials audited by the IRS annually including audits of company officers and board members personal finances. Bribes should come with a felony charge.
I don't see how a state could rig a federal endeavor. I do agree on an independent third-party redistricting commission though.
Are the boots on the ground in Texas gonna be hired in California?
Who’s doing the hiring? A Texas Republican?
Who’s staffing the Texas post offices?
I know, conspiracy theory shit. But look at the history in these states. Ya think fascists will play by the rules?
They do break each congressional district into very many different types of flavors and subunits When canvassing and they do hire from those communities for whatever that's worth.
I just have a paranoia after watching Red States cheat over decades. And that has only increased after the last 3 elections and Jan 6th. What else would they do? The Democrats are still trying to play as if they are dealing with the Reagan Republicans of the 1980's. This is different. They have evolved into actual Fascists. I mean, if they'll resort to an armed insurrection to overthrow an election, what would they stop at to steal an election inside a state they control?
Just because you're paranoid does not mean they aren't out to get you! 🤣
That’s really the only time it should be done, in response to a census
Thank you ☺️
Opinion
4Opinion
No, because the Republicans would just then bugger the census results.
I really don't think they could rig a federal run endeavor like the census.
The fact that a deep maga billionaire has bought Dominion election systems ahead of the 2026 elections scares the shit out of me.
The census isn't as reliable as you might think, so that metric alone shouldn't be the sole basis of redistricting. It's more complex than that and requires more data input.
That's irrelevant. It's the best we've got and yes there's more to it from a partisan perspective but my question was would you support having an objective time frame.
Yes, absolutely I would support having an objective time frame. It needs to be done, but I don't agree that the census is the best we've got, or the only metric we have. It's one of them. :)
No. population can change greatly so the districts should reflect this
Okay how often? Is it fair to constituents to have a merry-go-round of representatives? How is the representative to be effective and develop a relationship?
@DrPepper12 This will be like term limits.
Okay what number do you have in mind for term limits. I always advocate for 18 years. 9 in the house three in the Senate and one term for SCOTUS.
If this was a intelligent and rational society we would have a parliamentary system...
Nope.
Why not?
There’s more important things to fix firs
As far as election law is concerned I agree. The most important thing to fix is to destroy citizens United and go to public campaign financing with time limits on campaigning.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions