Which will be released first?

[goaded]

There's a video from Minnesota that shows the agents around the car from an upstairs window, and the front of the car. DHS released a low-quality version of it, which stops 4 seconds before the shooting. If it exonerated Ross, there's no way it wouldn't have been released (and, frankly, skeptics like me would accept the truth, no matter how unpalatable, unlike the right).

https://www.fox9.com/news/minneapolis-ice-shooting-new-video-from-dhs-shows-what-led-up-shooting

Then, there's the Epstein files, that law requires be delivered no later than 19 December last year, and Fox News reported that the Department of Justice redacted the names of "politically exposed individuals and government officials", in violation of the law.

The video that shows the Renee Good shooting from the front of the car

The full Epstein files (legally due almost a month ago, but still hidden)

See results

Updates

4 mo

This, supposedly, is "conspiracy theory spam": If the video exonerated Ross or even created reasonable doubt, the whole thing would have been released.

The DHS has been lying about what happened practically from the moment the shots were fired.

Updates

4 mo

"A two-thirds majority of Americans say the federal government is intentionally holding back some information about the Epstein case that should be released, while just 16% say the government is making an effort to release all information possible. The remainder say they haven’t heard enough about the case to say.

Nearly 9 in 10 Democrats and 72% of independents say the government is intentionally withholding information, as do 42% of Republicans." no poll about Ross or Jack Smith's report.

[Danzigdawson]

Neither probably. However, if trump and his leeches were forced to pick one, they would probably go with Renee Good's murder video, since it's surely less "important" in their eyes and it doesn't concern the orange slime god as directly as the epstein files.

[msc545]

You must be kidding. None of this is ever going to be released for any reason because both of them are harmful to Trump, particularly the Epstein files but also the Minnesota shooting files. Trump is not going to tolerate anything like this being in the public eye.

[msc545]

Thank you for MHO

[exitseven]

yawn, there is nothing in the Epstein files that says President Trump was one of his clients. We all know Bill Clinton was there several times. Bill and Hillery have already said that they will refiuse to testify. The big questiuon should be "what are they hiding?

[Danzigdawson]

@exitseven Who gives a shit about the Clintons, dumbass? Put them on trial, and if they're guilty, lock them up. I don't know how many more times people will have to explain this to MAGA retards: we're not in a cult. The Clintons or any other "liberal" politicians are not untouchable gods to us.

[goaded]

Chairman Comer,

We want to take a moment, given everything, to address you directly.

This past year has seen our Government engage in unprecedented acts, including against our own citizens. People have been seized by masked federal agents from their homes, their workplaces, and the streets of their communities. Students and scientists with visas permitting them to study and work here have been deported without due process. The people who laid siege to the U. S. Capitol have been pardoned and called heroes. Agencies vital to the country’s national security have been dismantled. Universities, media companies, and law firms have been subjected to threats to their funding, access, and licensing unless they made concessions and surrendered their right to constitutionally protected free speech. American troops have been deployed on the streets of our towns and cities. The Justice Department has been used as a weapon, at the direction of the President, to pursue political opponents. And most recently and searingly, an ICE agent killed an unarmed mother only days ago.

Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences.

For us, now is that time.

We are lucky by virtue of the positions we held, and the protections afforded by them. But we are not blind. Every day we see the country we have dedicated our lives to improving take step after step after step backwards.

As chairman of this powerful congressional committee, you have immense power to target anyone and subject them to closed door interrogation and more. The decisions you have made, and the priorities you have set as chairman regarding the Epstein investigation, have prevented progress in discovering the facts about the government’s role.
...

[goaded]

The facts speak for themselves: You subpoenaed eight people in addition to us. You dismissed seven of those eight without any of them saying a single word to you. You made no attempt to force them to appear. In fact, since you started your investigation last year, you have interviewed a total of two people. Two.

A legal analysis prepared by two law firms and provided to you yesterday makes clear your subpoenas are legally invalid. You claim your subpoenas are inviolate when they are used against us yet were silent when the sitting President took the same position, as a former president, barely more than three years ago. We call on you to release that analysis to the public to allow them to see how this is yet another example of the casual disregard of the law of the land. All the while, you have done nothing with your oversight capacity to force the Department of Justice to follow the law and release all its Epstein files, including any material regarding us as we have publicly called for.

Over the last year in the House, extending health care for Americans in any state succeeded only because enough Republicans joined with Democrats. The fact that the public and we are seeing any of the Department of Justice’s Epstein files is only because four Republicans, out of 220, joined every Democrat to reach the minimum number of Members to force a vote. You were not one of those four. Even now, despite the Department of Justice’s failure to follow the law the Congress passed, you have chosen not to consider subpoenaing the sitting Attorney General to follow the law.

Despite everything that needs to be done to help our country, you are on the cusp of bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a rarely used process literally designed to result in our imprisonment. This is not the way out of America’s ills, and we will forcefully defend ourselves.
...

[goaded]

Indeed, bringing the Republicans’ cruel agenda to a standstill while you work harder to pass a contempt charge against us than you have done on your investigation this past year would be our contribution to fighting the madness.

We have tried to give you the little information we have. We’ve done so because Mr. Epstein’s crimes were horrific. If the Government didn’t do all it could to investigate and prosecute these crimes, for whatever reason, that should be the focus of your work – to learn why and to prevent that from happening ever again. There is no evidence that you are doing so. Instead, you have forced the victims to relive their painful experiences, while doing little to give them and everybody else what’s deserved: truth and justice. There is no plausible explanation for what you are doing other than partisan politics.

You accepted the least from those who know the most but demand the most from those who know the least. To say you can’t complete your work without speaking to us is simply bizarre.

You have asked what we know. To answer your inquiry, we are providing you with the same or more than seven of the other eight individuals you subpoenaed regarding the handling of the Epstein investigations and prosecutions, which may be why you have not publicly released their written statements.

...

[goaded]

We expect you will say it is not enough. We expect you’ll reject it. You may even set out an empty chair or stand in front of the cameras and outright dismiss what we have provided. We expect you will direct your committee to seek to hold us in contempt. You may even release irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us. You will say your caucus, and the Speaker and the President are behind you 100%. We hope, perhaps in vain, that they will not allow you to singlehandedly hijack the Congress by unilaterally making this decision for your colleagues, your party, and our country.

You will say it is not our decision to make. But we have made it. Now you have to make yours.

We are prepared to make our case to your 45 committee members, and if need be, more. Importantly, we also will defend ourselves in the public arena and ensure this country knows exactly what you are doing and why you are doing so, instead of helping the American people who need this Congress’s work and protection.

For most people, maybe even the bulk of the Congress, today will be the first they learn of this dispute. We are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends.

Continue to mislead Americans about what is truly at stake, and you will learn that Americans are better at finding the truth than you are at burying it.

Continue to pursue autopens instead of penning laws Americans need, and you will learn that you are signing away any remaining chance of being on the right side of history.

Continue to abet the dismantling of America, and you will learn that it takes more than a wrecking ball to demolish what Americans have built over 250 years.

Sincerely,

Bill Clinton
Hillary Rodham Clinton

[goaded]

If there's nothing bad about Trump or Republicans in the Epstein files, why aren't they released as the law demands and Trump promised you when he was campaigning for your vote?

Why have they illegally redacted names of (Republican) politicians?

Hell, they even took Trump's name out of a document that was already public.

[msc545]

@exitseven you have no way of knowing what is or is not in the Epstein files. You have not seen them and none of us have. To just blindly State. There is nothing in the Epstein files about Trump your wishful thinking once again. Kind of session without foundation. Again.

[lightbulb27]

@msc545 We do know the Clintons declined to testify recently...

[goaded]

@lightbulb27 Look further up this opinion, I quoted their explanation. Comer is only after political points, not the truth.

[Shiprex]

Both should be released before the elections in US but I doubt either will be. Trump needs the 2A to be applied on his regime

[lightbulb27]

I expect more chaos to be released before those such that noone cares about those. maybe the police footage of ICE shooting the person that ran into him next.