Do you agree with Joe Rogan's assessment of Trump regarding the Iran war?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Iran Was building nukes, Iran Has been funding terrorism all across the world, Iran Was destabilizing the Middle East and actively supporting Other hostile nations, Iran Has tried to assassinate our president, Iran remains a “non threat” Because we prevent them from becoming one, That is all.


They aren’t a threat in the sense that they have nukes so that they could hurt us currently beyond all of their proxy attacks, But they are a threat in the sense that if we let them continue, they will eventually be able to hurt us and will eventually be able to cause some pretty Significant damage. Are we really gonna forget 9/11 So quickly? A good chunk of America is old enough to remember what happened.


Somebody mentioned how we already destroyed their nuclear capability, And while that is true, That neglect to mention the fact that you can rebuild a nuclear capabilities, and Iran Has actively been trying to rebuild their nuclear capabilities.


We wiped out half their navy like 50 years ago, I think it was but if you look at it, they have a much bigger navy now or at least they did at one point, But I think we handled that pretty good the second time around as well.

[Opinion Owner]

I bring up how we wiped out their navy because this is just one of the examples of them building things back up because they’re stubborn and actively want the Americans dead.

[DryGermanGuy]

Perfect example of the gears in an IQ90 brain grinding hard to arrive in reality. Only too late.

[Effably]

I must fiercely object. Donald Jr. Trump's only IQ test to ever surface was taken more than 60 years ago and scored him at 73.

By simple progression that is less than 70 right now. We should not blame the mentally disabled for being disabled. We should however condemn whoever let the guy into power.

[DryGermanGuy]

Yeah, but this question is about Joe Rogaine.

[Effably]

Ah. Yes. The only data on Joe Rogan is that he did an online test and paid for it. Got 127 on that, not verified.

That said it isn't an authentic test to start with so it says very little.

He seems roughly average intelligent to me so 90 might be fair. If it turns out to be 110 I won't be surprised either.

[MrChinaski]

@Effably A 20 point IQ difference is huge and easily noticeable.

[MrChinaski]

@Effably It's like a man who is 5'11" vs a man who is 5'7". They can do most of the same things, but you notice the difference easily.

[MrChinaski]

Regarding 90 vs 110, that is.

[Effably]

@MrChinaski I see your point but instead try to see it as me saying that he is within one standard deviation of normal and that normal good and normal bad is just not that observable or important.

There is also at times a disconnect between displayed intelligence and what people actually perform. So I am happy with some leeway.

[Effably]

So to stick to your height analogy if 5'11 is normal I am actually saying he is within the most normal range. Meaning 5'10 to 6'.

Being down at 5'7 is more than one standard deviation away!

[MrChinaski]

@Effably

Well, choose your favourite subpopulation and find their average height. The equivalent spread around that is 4 inches (2 inches either side).

Anyway, my point is choose four people. Typically one of them will have an IQ below 90, one above 110 and two in-between. Or put another way, a person with an IQ of 90 is dumber than 3/4 of people; a person with an IQ of 110 is smarter than 3/4 of people. It's a big difference.

Not looking to argue. Just embelishing my example.

[Sal_Monella]

Geez. I rather like Joe Rogan.

[Anonymous]

There has been confirmation that Trump raped children. This is not a win for anyone, why in the hell has this been an unresolved issue? It’s like Trump and his crimes, no one is doing a damn thing about it. Put these disgusting bastards in prison and show us that justice still exists!

[Anonymous]

Yep. Trump is a liar. Who knew? I am surprised he is surprised it was a lie.

[BonzoInBitburg]

It should be renamed Operation Epic Fiasco. Regime change takes years if not decades not weeks. This war wasn't very well thought out. Trump says it's almost over and Iran says they aren't interested in a ceasefire. The US attacks with infrastructure with bombs and Iran attacks the US's biggest vulnerability, the economy by sending oil prices sky high and through hacking. Checkers vs chess. This is going to be a long one.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15639521/Leaked-US-intel-undermines-Trumps-claim-Iran-war-won.html

[Snakeyes7]

I don't for a couple reasons. First, this barely counts as a war in my mind because, unless something changed, we haven't landed a single soldier there.

Second, there is a difference between wanting war and not wanting it but knowing when you have to engage.

Third, this is not a "new war." This is a conflict that we are hoping Trump will finish once and for all after decades of previous presidents kicking the can down the road and making it our problem now when this should have been taken care of decades ago.

[strateguy632]

he meant no spending money on ukraine. he accomplished the goal in June bombing all the atomic stuff he knew. so that "we did it" was true, even if he did not know about other ones until later. telling a lie is when you know it is a lie. now we are not only bombing uranium enrichment it is a different goal. and not israel goal either it was not decided by israel.

[lightbulb27]

yes.

when in the big seat, things change. I suspect if Joe was in the seat, we'd have more wars as well. We are the worlds fading power and buddies with ISrael. ISrael doesn't get along with anyone else in the area, which by some stroke of bad luck... is smack dab where most of the blood of the global economy flows. Cannot constrict that area... of which Iran has a lot of control... and they hate Israel.

The script is written for global demise.

[loveslongnails]

His last part of it is wrong. The reasons for it are clear two fold: 1) Draw US attention away from the Epstein files, 2) Take over Iran's oil fields.

If you believe it was about keeping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, you probably believed that the attack in June of 2025 neutralized or destroyed their entire nuclear program, and you probably believe the USA is the protector of Democracy around the world. In other words, you'd be an idiot.

[AviatorTom]

Trump and Karoline have made it clear that the reason is to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons and intercontinental missiles.

What hasn't been said is that Israel was planning this, and asked the US to assist.

[SofaKingsMart]

Trump said their nuclear capabilities were “obliterated” back in June.
Was it a lie then?
Or is it a lie now?

[AviatorTom]

@SofaKingsMart It was not a lie back then. The known facilities were obliterated. Iran has since moved to underground sites and built new refinement faciities.

[SofaKingsMart]

@AviatorTom
So you’re telling me that Trump, and all his so called “experts” were completely fooled by Iran when they declared “We obliterated … the future nuclear capability of Iran.”
I mean, if it was actually “obliterated,” it wouldn’t be rebuilt and functional in less than a year.

Your reasoning doesn’t make them look any better.
You understand that, right?

[AviatorTom]

@SofaKingsMart They obliterated what they knew. Apparently, Iran had at least one facility they didn't know about. Plus, Iran has gotten help from other countries (Russia, China, North Korea) to start a new weapons program.

[Asker]

@SofaKingsMart It was a lie both times!

[SofaKingsMart]

@AviatorTom
He’s using that word again.
“Obliterated.”
Maybe he just doesn’t know what the word means?

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

He says that like he didn’t play a role in getting him elected

[OneViewpoint]

NO. Joe Rogan doesn't seem to understand that the morons of MAGA didn't vote for policy. They voted for hate. They will keep defending tRump. They will always vote for hate.

[CaptainObivous]

This isn't entirely true, yes there are some die-hard MAGA's defending Trump and attacking anyone who disagrees with him, but there a many MAGA's and non MAGA Trump voters who realistically voted for Trump based on campaign promises, who are currently outraged and feel betrayed over Epestein files and Iran.

[CaptainObivous]

100% agree, and I've been seeing a lot of Trump voters on social feeling betrayed and and angry at Trump for breaking his campaign promise of no new wars.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

Because Iran is the source of all the problems. They're funding all the terrorism and causing problems for world trade. It's not a small deal.

[molonski2]

Agree 100 % it's completely ludicrous this situation , should have never happened.

[Kabluie]

Joe Rogan: Fell for it again award. Was all-in on president Dufus and now every week regrets that decision.

[Screenwriter]

Not a Rogan fan, but his assessment sounds rational to me.

[Anonymous]

The Biden regime gave iran the means to produce a nuke. When iran says death to America we should believe them.

[DonaldDarko]

No he's probably another "it's the joooooooos nat soc adjacent personality.

[Anonymous]

Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.

[Sal_Monella]

He is entitled to his opinion. I disagree with it.

[Anonymous]

No. If that is a real rogan quote.

the removal of the regime in Iran was necessary and the Iranian people are thankful.

[Snowman84]

Well, he helped Trump get elected, so fuck him.

[Ariesman81]

No he didn't. He offered Kamala a platform and her response was fuck off and submit to me.

[CaptainObivous]

He actually didn't, like @ariesman81 already mentioned, Rogan offered Harris the same opportunity as Trump to appear on his podcast, and her campaign rejected the offer when Rogan refused to do the podcast on their terms. Not going on Rogan's podcast was on Harris and her campaign not Rogan.

[Ariesman81]

@CaptainObivous

It sounds shinier when you explain it

[CaptainObivous]

@Ariesman81 Harris was already seen as a weak candidate, and refusing to do a podcast with Rogan unless it was on her terms made her look even weaker.

[Ariesman81]

@CaptainObivous

At the very least it was a sign of how she dealt with men of influence. I mean come on... did they really think a professional submission artist was gonna submit?

[Staximus]

I agree with him

[katiesmuff]

I'd agree all the way with that statement.

[beefcakebradybatson]

ABSOLUTELY !!!

[Anonymous]

I don't listen to Joe Rogan ❌🤞

[Pterodon]

Nope