
https://robertreich.substack.com/p/sunday-caption-contest-the-show
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
https://robertreich.substack.com/p/sunday-caption-contest-the-show
It's nothing more than my party can redistrict and your party can't
Redistricting is the same thing as election rigging dressed up.
Opinion
4Opinion
It’s not a false statement.
Democracy is a zero sum game.
There are winners and losers.
That’s by design.
You can vote. But if you lose the thing you’re voting for because more people voted against you then your vote no longer matters, theirs does.
You’re given a voice but you’re not given “power”
Your voice is only one of many and what the herd decides is what gets done
There are better designs, especially for country or state-wide elections for a single office.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_runoff_voting
I hadn’t heard of that one.
It’s not bad at all.
Clearly would solve a major issue with the classic majority winner which is the need to pick a lesser evil, because if you hate one candidate then you’re better off voting for the one who’s got the best chance at beating him.
But voting out of disapproval instead of voting for the one you approve of seems counter productive.
Still it doesn’t change the main point of my answer: if your candidate lost the elections, regardless of what model is applied, your vote no longer matters in the day to day decision making.
The winner will always have the duty and privilege of making choices that affect everyone. Both his voters and his opposition alike.
Well, that's true, until the next election. The idea is that they can only do limited damage in two years (US rules), and that the other branches will keep them in order, which turns out to be an empty hope.
You know Trump just stole nearly $2bn taxpayer money to give to people who broke the law on his behalf?
Lol, he ought to hang his head in shame for saying something so stupid.
It sounds like the corrupted nature of government has taken hold.
Ah, you say "the government", when you mean "the Republicans".
The Republicans nominated all the "justices" who approved Citizens United. The Republicans in congress aren't holding Trump to the law (they just all went home rather than lose a vote on stopping Trump's illegal Iran war). Not to mention the times the Republicans in Congress didn't impeach or convict Trump the first two times.
I have no doubt that moonbat Robert Reich would love to have all illegal aliens vote.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions