Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Today, up to 90% of the paternal lineage of people identified as mestizos in Latin America traces back to Spanish conquistadors. That is, even if native genes are generally dominant, it is very likely that the paternal lineage comes from Spanish settlers. This part is certain. How do you think this mixing happened?
Of the little I've read, the Spanish had better weapons. As local men fought back, they died or subjugated by fear. That leaves the women to survive to pass on their genetics, which they did. Men are replaceable.
Can only imagine some were not willing, but at times, women have no choice. Once pregnant and with kids, she's stuck. Happens today too. Happens to guys too... being stuck.
And people wonder why humans are so screwy, it takes generations to bleed out the sub conscious traumas that lurk.
Maybe why "Latina" woman are so loud an high energy, it's the violence coming out.
It's all really disgusting if ya think about it too much. Know how often all them would bathe? How disgusting they were after traveling the ocean?
Montezuma got his revenge though...
The latter happens to all conquered cultures because women just can't close their legs, even for their enemy replacing them & who killed their dad's & brothers in combat.
You can see this kind of mental illness in the hoes that get groomed by many of the 3rd world rape gangs because they're still getting drugs and money out of it & conveniently only suddenly realise they were being raped this whole time when the law finds out they were getting pimped since being underaged.
White people need to understand women's hidden fetish better if we are to become 1/3rd of the planets population again.
Opinion
10Opinion
It was some of both but Felipe Guamán Poma de Ayala the native historian contemporary with the Spanish conquest who didn't care too much for the Spanish complains about not just the Spanish behavior, but the behavior of Native women too in such relationships, meaning he felt the native women weren't unwilling a lot of the time.
I'm betting human nature happened. We certainly know the conquest happened. And with it the time honored tradition of the pillaging of the local's gold. And there was plenty of slaughter of native warriors. What are the odds a bunch of Spaniards fresh off of 3 months on a ship didn't indulge in rape of the conquered local women?
No doubt there was the odd spot of raping and running cute native girls down.
But the majority would have happened in the usual way. Cute native girls trying to score a high status man who has just proved himself better and the previous guys she had to choose from.
Everyone is obsessed with Europeans and those with European ancestry.
It's why so many Turkish and Indian accounts keep asking what we think of them.
We know you need validation 🤷♂️
First of all, that complex of ours emerged in the 19th century with Westernization. The funny part is that this segment, which is obsessed with Europe, considers itself anti-conservative and progressive. However, after World War II, America came to the fore, and today global capital is shifting to the Pacific, yet they are still obsessed with Europe. The main reason for this is STATUS.
On the other hand, let's address the perception of beauty: the Ottomans disliked Western European men because they found them soft, and their women because they found them harsh. Instead, women from Eastern Europe and the Caucasus were perceived as feminine and beautiful. For this reason, the mothers of the sultans were either Slavic or Circassian. Today, too, Turkish men are obsessed with Russian women, not American or French women.
The obsession with fair skin in India goes back a very long time, likely to the Aryan migrations. The blonde, blue-eyed Aryans who conquered India with horse-drawn war chariots brought the caste system to India. It is a fact that the upper caste, the Brahmins, are genetically closer to Northern Europeans.
On the other hand, Arabs are also in love with fair skin; in fact, the words houri and nuri mean white. However, they are obsessed with Turks. There is a personal name among Arabs, 'Turki', which means beautiful and handsome. In fact, there are several people from the House of Saud with this name
Thanks for agreeing 😂 🤷♂️
It's getting creepy. Find a new hobby.
Dude, thanks to me you learn something new every day; instead of judging, you should be thanking me
I'm learning mainly that you are obsessed with my race 😂 🤷♂️
@Jackblue very true 🤷♂️
Even one of the first conflict in US history was against the Barbary slave states. Morocco actually signed an agreement with the US, making it the longest official relationship. The other 3 Barbary states didn't, because they were controlled (ironically, with our friend here) by the Ottoman Empire.
The reason you browns are obsessed with is whites is because you want to pinch our better generics.
I keep saying it and it's more true each day.
@FrodoSkywalker007 Britain ended global slavery & the US was just following an English trend. Back then most of the US was English whereas there's not many true ethnic Americans any more as they mostly claim decent from Ireland & Germany (fuck you for that Americans, you never bring up your Anglo ancestry ever you spiteful cunts).
@Taranis_Thunor I know 🤷♂️ 😂
You have your dates off though.
The Barbary Wars took place before the British abolished it. At that point, most paid tribute to them. The Spanish actually paid tribute for the first captured US ship. We eventually got tired of it and went to war over it. The Barbary States ceased to be relevant afterwards 🤷♂️
@Taranis_Thunor and before you reply.
"Tired by it" is reference to the Barbary States attacking our ships and enslaving our merchants. Europe generally just paid tribute to avoid dealing with it.
The US would not end its own slavery until 50+ years later.
You are simply mixing up events and dates 🤷♂️
Uh no the British went on a huge moral crusade throughout the entire 19th century to end Barbary slavery, the American contribution was minor in comparison. The Gattling gun was invented to destroy Barbary pirates. Barbary piracy has been an issue since the 7th century, a longer history of industrial scale slavery of other races then what white people ever did.
Slavery was hard to end in the US because so much of the economy depended on its and once you did and slavery it caused a civil war and many black people became dangerous highway men.
Barbary slavery was far more immoral then the slavery practiced by white people who saw ourselves as on a civilisational mission, white man's burden.
Slavery was banned on English soil by William the Conquerer (unfortunately because this was used to disempower the English)
@Taranis_Thunor incorrect.
Attempt some research on this.
The 1st and 2nd Barbary Wars heavily impacted their ability to operate, and nearly halted their piracy. The French conquest of Algiers in the 1830s officially ended it.
Try again 🤷♂️
@Taranis_Thunor the issue Europeans have is acceptance of US influence.
Your nations didn't deal with thr Barbary States, instead you paid ransom and tribute.
The US actually launched military campaigns that ensured complete freedom of navigation for our merchant ships and free American and Europeans.
This actually influenced Europeans to do the same.
There was a Dutch bombardment of Algiers the next year, and a French conquest of the region in 1830.
The US was the catalyst 🤷♂️
Feel free to look it up.
Yeah you're talking about WAR between states, whereas the act of hunting pirates isn't inherently war. Britain ended slavery across the world, going into Africa to force an end to slavery as long as 1833 and we continued to police & end slavery afterwards. We continued to hunt slave pirates way into the latter 19th century but you can't exactly place a date on something like that.
@Taranis_Thunor I'm not denying that.
I'm simply saying the US actually FOUGHT a slave state Europeans refused to fight (and instead paid tribute).
It influenced Europeans to launch campaigns against them, seeing a young nation having succeeded at it. 🤷♂️
How about you try looking into British history first and understanding everything America ever had and accomplished was downstream of English culture & philosophical concepts that existed before America did. Though not enshrined into law the ideal of Free speech was already a large part of English culture before we settled the Americas. The US only started making moves to end slavery after Britain did and we spent so much taxes on ending slavery around the globe that our people were still paying off the debt by 2015
@Taranis_Thunor for reference our Barbary Wars took place from 1801 to 1815. 🤷♂️
You're just lumping Britain in with the rest of the Europeans because Americans think they're something special when in reality the true founding stock of America was English and you all resent us for that influence for some reason.
@Taranis_Thunor lol, im not denying that. I'm proud of our European roots. It's what made us successful.
I'm merely saying, in this case, Europe did nothing, until the US acted.
Barbary wars was just to prevent white people from being enslaved which was good enough at that time and tbh shouldn't we have stopped there?
I noticed you say you're proud of your European roots but didn't say you were proud of Americas English roots because you and I both know Americans fucking hate the English & define themselves in contrast to what they think we're like. This is why Americans even claim their accent is older then the English one like people in England had American accents just because we had some Rhotic (which we still have).
@Taranis_Thunor lol no. In the US case, we defeated them in war because they attacked our shipping. It had nothing to do with slavery. We practiced it for another 50 years. We simply hated having our merchant fleet attacked, and being forced to pay tribute.
Hence the enslavement of its people who are white stopped.
@Taranis_Thunor lol because it's true. Posh was a fad. It didn't impact most of the US.
It's also why the Boston accent is closer to yours.
@FrodoSkywalker007 To mine? I'm fucking Northern English we have rhoticity around here and pronounce our Oo & Oh sounds with "Uh" sounds. You just proved you know nothing because Americans are always ignorant when it comes to English culture. Apparently just looking at London is enough for you lot.
The English regional dialects found and spoken by 99% of the country even in London can be traced back further then the colonisation of America & there's now videos debunking the stupid videos claiming that British people invented new accents as a fad, which is ridiculous and you should have to prove
@Taranis_Thunor let me just repeat it simply.
1. Yes, the Brits led a crusade against slavery. The US had little influence on that, for we would fight a civil war over it decades later.
2. The Barbary Wars had little to do with slavery as a moral issue. The US went to war simply due to attacks on our shipping. Europeans only paid tribute to them, but after seen the US (which was very young) handling so decisively, the Europeans started to do the same, until the French conquered them in 1830.
I'm not denying anything you are saying.
Simply that in this case, Europe didn't start anything. You preferred to pay tribute. We decided against it.
@Taranis_Thunor I'm sorry friend, but dropping the R was a sign of the wealthy class.
We were British 🤷♂️
We adopted many things from you that you now ridicule us for.
Like Soccer. Not our creation. We didn't invent the word. That was your.
Brits simply moved on, forgot, and attack their younger brother 🤷♂️
Likely cause America was too poor to end it and it turns out white people are really good at warring against states meant to be stronger than their own
@Taranis_Thunor well of course. The US was tiny.
It had many decades before it became anything close to resembling what exists today
@Taranis_Thunor I should mention we know this, because some of our regional accents (like Boston) were influenced by this change. 🤷♂️
" I'm sorry friend, but dropping the R was a sign of the wealthy class." Completely wrong once again because Rhoticity was not just associated with the impoverished and many in south Eastern England didn't bother with Rhoticity, likely because of their Saxon & Norman roots distinguishing their accent, as all regions were distinguished. Americans literally make the claim that the English just dropped Rhoticity as a planned social stunt without evidence meanwhilst rejecting that their drifted changed over time & split from each other without giving the English that same credit.
When I listen to old footage of elderly Americans who grew up in the 1800's they sound clearer, deeper & more familiar to our way of talking and that is despite all of the Americanism words they were using, because the American accent was a lot closer to ours in general & the squeekiness seems to be something they adopted from all that Irish, German and led pipe water (probably) influence.
All ball games used to be called Football and we called Soccer football even back then but the exact rules for modern football (soccer) was called soccer to distinguish it from other football games. Calling Soccer, soccer is traditional, calling Rugby football though is just plain wrong.
You Americans have been attacking us for decades because you're insecure about being mixed with multiple European ethnicities I think. English used to bite back but all this gay ass Trumpism is causing a lot of us to try to befriend America which is a massive mistake because you guys aren't our friends, which is obvious by the fact you're always reminding us of your Irish heritage and never bring up your English heritage (the founding stock of your nation by the way).
@Taranis_Thunor 🤦♂️ euro fan boys are rough.
The American accent just randomly adopted an R sound out of nowhere. Yep.
The fact that all English accents were originally rhotic, is just false. Likely because Brits have to be difficult 😂
Whatever makes you feel better. Simple research show this as wrong though.
English was rhotic.
Americans largely kept it
The Brits changed this due to upperclass society.
Americans didn't just magically decide to start having a rhotic accent. We adopted it from you.
Brits are crazy 🤷♂️
Also to further show from my personal experience that you Americans have no idea what we English actually sound and behave like (because you just get our rich people moving over) whenever I've spoken to Americans they say shit like "You sound Scottish" of "What kinda accent is that? 🤣" Suddenly the jokes on passing "the wa-tah" stop.
@Taranis_Thunor friend, you are proving my point 🤦♂️.
English was rhotic, it's still rhotic in some parts of the UK.
Americans adopted it (because they were British), and left before the upper class trend of non rhotic.
It's that simple 🤷♂️
My ancestors were not even part of this, because they were all in Asia or Europe at that time 😂
"The American accent just randomly adopted an R sound out of nowhere. Yep." That's not what I said. You partially adopted it from Northern English (probably North-West, where the industrial world was given birth to and where I'm from) and even more likely from the Irish & Scottish, who spoke dialects of Northumbrian English (in the case of the Scottish it's because Edinburgh always consisted of conquered Anglo Saxon in their history, who went on to become more influential then the Gaels themselves).
"The fact that all English accents were originally rhotic, is just false. Likely because Brits have to be difficult " I never said all English accents were Rhotic I said the opposite. And it's Americans who adopted barbarian influences like Irish, Scottish and German who are being awkward as you're speaking English not Gaelic lmao
"Whatever makes you feel better. Simple research show this as wrong though.", and those YouTube videos you think is well researched have actually been debunked by experts who specialise in the English language, something our country has more of.
Watch "Why the Americans really don't have the original English accent" by "DaveHuxtableLanguages" who disproves this claim so many Americans are making yo delegitinise & subtly undermine English culture (all whilst in a time where you know thousands of our girls are being raped from this very anti-anglo hatred, both self inflicted & propaganda to others).
"English was rhotic." Wrong there was never one English accent or dialect just like there isn't now. England was settled by various North-Sea Germanic tribes like various Jutes, Saxons & Angles which roughly aliens with the dialectical borders we still have to this day.
"The Brits changed this due to upperclass society." You invented this and many Americans do because of "vibes" but can't actually prove it.
The English didn't magically decide to drop Rhotic and you're just as crazy as you're claiming I am by that logic.
@Taranis_Thunor furthermore, we call British English non rhotic, because it's where it came from. Also, the majority of British speakers are currently non rhotic. A simple search I made shows only 5% to 10% of British speakers are rhotic.
In the US, we are dominantly rhotic outside of certain areas like Boston and NYC.
This is why we claim to have a more original accent than you. 🤷♂️
"English was rhotic, it's still rhotic in some parts of the UK" wrong we were not entirely Rhotic for as far back as we can trace it because the original Anglo Saxon language distinguished Rhotic sounds & non Rhotic sounds in it's very special alphabet where the R sounds were distinguished (think about the fact that we had special letters like Æ we don't have to this day).
All over Asia or Europe? So you're a turk?
@Taranis_Thunor whatever. Lol
Obviously you are not reachable on this topic 🤷♂️
@Taranis_Thunor I'll surrender to you on this topic. It's not something I care much about. We will have to agree to disagree.
My family is largely German.
Father had a mother from Thailand
"Also, the majority of British speakers are currently non rhotic" that's because of migration from the Southern part of the country to the industrialised North-West but even still this very area still has Rhotic speaking parts. And many of the "non-rhotic" accents are actually still Rhotic with many words and not with others, so it's not even something you can measure on a map and only something you can pick up on by actually listening to how we say our words across the whole country, which varies so greatly even I've not heard them all.
Your accent is not more original it's blended with Irish and Scottish influences which adopted Rhoticity from Northumbrian English specifically. But the adoption of the Irish & Scottish accents into yours makes yours inherently less English & sound more alien to the original English accent. Like I said when I listen to old footage of Americans speaking, despite you lot calling it a "heavy American accent" they actually sounded clearer, deeper & more well spoken to me.
Yes ofc you're "largely German" that's something I've heard from every American ever, with Irish & Scottish coming 2nd & 3rd most common.
@Taranis_Thunor my family wasn't even in the US when this was relevant. 🤷♂️
We've only been here a few generations
@Taranis_Thunor that's due to the mass migration.
Most of my family migrated here in the 1890s.
I have one side of the family (though my grandmother) that has distant English connections.
My last name is German, though Americanized.
🤷♂️
Also if America has some non Rhotic speaking areas how did that occur if our accent was originally entirely Rhotic by the time we settled America to begin with?
Coming from someone who pronounces more with "Uh" & "Ur" then "Ough" and "Ah"
@FrodoSkywalker007 Americans never mention the distant English ancestry but they pretty much nearly always actually have it.
@Taranis_Thunor because is spread through our high class due to British contact. 🤷♂️
@Taranis_Thunor I don't mention it because it's not the majority of my family, or even my name.
@FrodoSkywalker007 The American colonists hardly would've had much contact with many in England back in the 1700's & 1800's.
@FrodoSkywalker007 My point is that Americans never mention their English ancestry outside the KKK, which I'm starting to think are our greatest allies in the US.
@Taranis_Thunor 🤦♂️ we certainly had relations in the 1800s.
But not much personal contact thanks to hard it is to reach the US using a wooden ship.
@Taranis_Thunor I've heard it plenty 🤷♂️
I see no animosity here against you.
I see plenty of interest and respect.
@Taranis_Thunor you had territories here. 😂. Literally next door neighbors.
Not to mention, I'm speaking about the US high class, who had reason to communicate with Brits. Trade, politics. Etc
@FrodoSkywalker007 Well as someone who gets to speak to Americans online all the time I never hear it and when they do mention it, it seems to be more out of irritation and treated like the boring side of their ancestry.
@Taranis_Thunor it's because English is no longer dominate 🤷♂️
I'm sorry that Americans with German, or Italian, or Irish... etc don't mention English
@FrodoSkywalker007 A small high class elite isn't enough to change the accent of an entire region. Their accents would've drifted too as they did so why would Americans willingly adopt non-rhoticity? That they never had to begin with according to you
@Taranis_Thunor I'm not even talking about "whole regions"
I'm talking about cities.
Boston is extremely unique in the US.
The US is massive.
When we won independence, we were already larger than the territory of England.
@FrodoSkywalker007 I find it hard to believe Americans have more Irish & Scottish ancestry in those depopulated countries then they do from England. It's just Celtic fetishisation & a hate & lack of understanding of the English. For instance did you know "Celtic knotwork" was actually a style introduced to Britain from the Anglo Saxons not even the Celts. The Celts just take our pretty stuff, slap the "Celtic" label on it and call it a day because they have no culture.
@Taranis_Thunor compare the US white population to the UK. Which is larger?
There is your answer.
Britain controlled much more territory as a whole and England is less of a territory back then & more of a nation being undermined by the fake & gay "British" identity, an identity which apparently accepts Celts as our superiors more deserving of their own unique parliament where the English don't get to have our own parliament.
When the Scottish become independent & Britain disassembles I can't wait to get revenge on those Scots & crush their nation entirely. An English Empire will suit us much better then a general "British" one ever did, because we were being too fair.
Yeah but back then the US population was actually far lower plus I meant the territorial control
@Taranis_Thunor once again, we are speaking about England, not your empire.
The US is much larger.
@Taranis_Thunor of course, and that's my point.
The US population massively increased.
Obviously, the immigrants overtook the English population.
@FrodoSkywalker007 Because the US is larger than almost all nations on the planet with some notable exceptions such as other global powers like China.
@FrodoSkywalker007 I think it's less likely Americans are just simply so much of a melting pot they have no English ancestry anymore and more to do with the American bias against the English. This is why the Americans cheer on Irish terrorists, rapists & baby killers like the IRA who have plenty of contacts in America.
@Taranis_Thunor of course.
My point is...
The US inherited massive territory.
It also obtained masses of migrants from other European nations.
This is why English heritage is not talked about by many White Americans. Because many don't have it.
Many are Polish, German, Italian.. etc
@Taranis_Thunor I know nothing of the US supporting the IRA.
It could be connected to the Irish population. They even started a war in Canada 😂
@FrodoSkywalker007 No they just highlight those heritages. You actually think the Americans have more Polish genetics then English? Then why do Americans share the same phenotypes that England does visually?
Their DNA average and English ancestry can be researched so I'll do that now.
@Taranis_Thunor no, most are German. That is by far the largest group. 🤷♂️
Q "how much % of English ancestry does the average white American have"
A "how much % of English ancestry does the average white American have
There is no official genetic percentage for the average English ancestry of a white American, but self-reported 2020 Census data from the U. S. Census Bureau shows that about 19.8% to 22% of white Americans report English or part-English origins.
Census and Self-Reporting Data
• Self-Reported Numbers: In the 2020 census, roughly 46.5 million Americans reported English ancestry (either alone or in combination with other groups), representing nearly 20% of the white population.
• The "American" Category: Demographers note that English ancestry is heavily undercounted. Millions of white Americans—particularly in the South and rural areas—write down "American" on the census instead of their historical English roots because their families have been in the country for centuries."
Q, "what percent of americans have german ancestry"
A "Approximately 11.8% to 17% of Americans have German ancestry, making it the largest self-reported European ancestry group in the United States."
Americans do reject our identity because they hate us so Americans so screw them. If they ever come asking us to get involved in one of their wars (for Israel likely) conveniently they're suddenly our brother's it should be a hard no.
I'll never see them as friends to the English because of this.
I'm starting to think the actual Germans, Scandinavians & Rhineland French (Walloons) have more in common with us because at least they like a good alcoholic beverage not like in the US (brewing culture originated from us Germanic people, that the English were a part of).
@Taranis_Thunor 🤦♂️
@Taranis_Thunor and this is what I mean
"In part"
I could label myself as English because of distant relatives.
However, I'm dominated German in both sides of the family, as are most people I know.
This is why it's the largest reported background.
@FrodoSkywalker007 So Americans are rejecting their English heritage on the basis that it's "distant". I don't think so because the more distant something is the more exotic & treasured it should become. I think America embracing the melting pot undermined their English heritage that they did used to have. The founding fathers actually flew the US flag and the US at one time might've had a claim to some kind of English Empire themselves, but they decided to undermine their heritage for a universal generic Christian one.
Reembrace your cowboy spirit & architecture because at this rate your roots will be associated with this degenerate century.
@Taranis_Thunor let me explain using me
My mother's side of the family (grandfather has German roots, Grandmother has German and English roots)
My father's side of the family (grandfather has German roots, Grandmother from Thailand)
So, by your definition, I should label myself Thai?
Yes, you're mixed ethnically.
@Taranis_Thunor it's the US, everyone is.
That's the point 🤷♂️
Think of the UK now, with massive muslim populations. Let's say you intermingle for a century or more. Do you now identify as something else?
What if someone's children come from largely Pakistani roots, but their grandfather's uncle was English?
No not everyone is "ethnically mixed" in the way you're suggesting. Your ancestors can be mapped across the world recently whereas mine can only be mapped to England, Sweden, Poland & Scotland in recent ancestry and that makes me likely more mixed ethnically then most as most of us lived in isolation and were only invaded by tiny populations of Norman's and Vikings (and the English & Danes were originally part of the same tribe anyway, look up Angul & Dan).
"Let's say you intermingle for a century or more. Do you now identify as something else?" I absolutely would and would even argue that if these islamic descendants form a majority it's not even legitimately England anymore as we're Englaland, land of the Englakin (Anglecynn) not Indus valley land.
"What if someone's children come from largely Pakistani roots, but their grandfather's uncle was English?" Then I wouldn't even consider them to be English beyond being slightly ethnically English. They'd still be deported back to their homeland.
For someone with Frodo in his name, a Hobbit (a hobgoblin or brownie where I'm from) shouldn't you be a massive Anglophile considering that LOTR is just reconstructed English myth. People try to connect it to other myths too but it really is mostly English myth even down to Gandalf being a manifestation of our great & wise King, Wōden.
@Taranis_Thunor precisely. So,. I'm not English 🤷♂️
That's why when asked, I will reply German. My name is German, both of my familes are dominated German.
My family history in the US is barely over a century old.
The only connection past that is the English roots on my Grandmothers side, which are only (if I remember correctly) come from one of her parents sides. 🤷♂️
Im not an anglophile, but certainly have respect for your culture and history.
Well yournpersonal heritage isn't really my point I'm trying to make though.
Most Americans descend from the English yet actively reject their Anglo roots, ancestry and ethnic self-consciousness in favour of some fake Celt LARP.
This is why your pagans embrace fake & gay "Norse paganism" (which was never real) over their English equivalent of Germanic / Teutonic Paganism (I prefer thr word Teutonic, or even Theodish, to Germanic but they both mean the same thing).
Not long ago the Americans thought we were all walking around with Bowler hats lmao.
Thank you for the respect. Tolkien captured out culture wonderfully and you'll learn more from his stuff then all these popular media movies & TV shows trying to dehumanise us & tear us from our roots (like Braveheart and the Vikings series)
@Taranis_Thunor I'm far more of a Star Wars fan 🤷♂️
@Taranis_Thunor Americans feeling white guilt always claim to have Irish and Native American roots, citing a mere 1% Native American ancestry. Yet, it would make more sense if Black Americans claimed to be white, given that their genetics are roughly 20% European and 80% African
@MerakSahibi you say lots of weird stuff.
In this case, I'd say you are right 🤷♂️
@MerakSahibi Those black people do have white roots but they actively reject it because they despise white people overall out of their own insecurity.
they killed most of the men and raped all of the women. i'm a bastard's relative
@Sevenpointfive congrats
Simple. There was an influx of young strong intelligent young men that had plenty of money. Women always seek out the strongest possible mate.
By having a lot of great sex. And it's good to expand the gene pool.
They killed the native men and the survival instinct of the women kicked in. Adapt or die.
Well, I'm just guessing, of course, but I think they probably had sex. What do you think?
I dont know
Rape. Thats been well documented.
Rapes and alliances
And I don't "think". It's historic fact
You can also add your opinion below!
