No. They weaken the gene pool. Obvious by how disabilities, physical and mental, are increasing per population rate.
Just 100 to 200 years ago when social services and support did not exist mother nature & society would've kept most from reproducing as they'd have died young.
I believe the disability rate is increasing because of how children come up in the environments we are responsible for causing. Also the side effects of drugs altering their DNA strands in their parents or anywhere in the family tree.
For example, the crack cocaine epidemic birthed the ADHD period. Methamphetamine MDMA and similar uppers birthed the majority of bipolar and skizophrannia, but other disorders like bipolar, depression, anxiety are all mainly environmentally caused through PTSD, and yes, Kids can get PTSD easier, because their brains are being affected chemically due to survivalist reactions to their environment while it is still developing, causing their brain to chemically stimulate more frequently to "triggers".
Even people who used stuff like ecstasy while pregnant were studied and ended up with depression, because their brain cannot stimulate without the assisted amounts of dopamine.
This "Gene-Pool" science doesn't eliminate how we treat each other as human beings, and will not bring a change in the future of how we function til everybody grows up and treats each other right.
Remember, the Gene Pool science was Hitlers approach, and we see how hard he failed!!
Physical illnesses are caused by child birth problems or failure to genetically fuse human DNA during conception of the child?
Down syndrome and diseases similar have to do with how the RNA in a Human Cell tells their body to reproduce chromosomes.
That same information can be damaged through irresponsible acts up the family tree and is often an adaptation to such acts. Heart problems or lung problems could be caffeine or smoking while pregnant, or drug use of uppers while pregnant.
If not the that birth defect is a problem with how they are birthed, then that's the hospitals fault, like most of the time blindness, and other diseases.
If you hate disabled kids that much, if you are afraid of them continuing or living their lives like normal society, then I hope you have a kid that's special so you can learn to love them properly.
Point being, until we have parents responsible enough to take care of themselves while pregnant, and until we have hospitals with more advanced procedures for taking care or babies after birth, and in the operating room, then we will continue having disabled kids.
So-called "sane" people regularly vote for autocrats, buy huge gas-guzzling cars despite global warming, etc. They drive recklessly. They listen to Imagine Dragons.
I think labeling someone "mentally ill" is such a manipulative and spiritually impoverished thing to do.
In the big scheme of things, it doesn't matter. Highly intelligent people almost never mate with such inferiors. Therefore, on average, their children will continue to be intelligent and successful. Granted, their percentage of the population may drop in our present developed economy. However, when extremely tough and difficult conditions occur and, in time, they almost certainly will, survival of the fittest will eliminate most of the very unfit and their children.
Some isn't good for the child in recent time and creates longtime issues for the child because of how the parents behaves. Some other is like previous and give them unpleasant inherited genes.
Then you have those that doesn't really matter unless they have attitude problems.
While I WOULD be in favor of Mentally Ill People NOT reproducing, that NEVER STOPPED DJT from doing the nasty deed leaving his progeny EVERYWHERE to accost us!
Plus WHO gets to decide? This is an oily slick slope for decision-making on deciding who gets REMOVED from the deepend of the human genepool!
I don´t know if she´s really mentally ill because I don´t know much about her case. If she is, I don´t think it´s a good idea because she can´t handle the consequences and that´s one of the things she shouldn´t do.
Most people with mental illness don’t have relatives with the same mental illness. Mental illness can run in families sometimes though, like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Mentally ill can vary from person to person. Brittney should marry whoever she wants to without judgment. If it a person with severe memory loss or something worse than it would be extremely stressful for the partner to deal with not only his/her problems but the partners problems as well. Point is that marriage shouldn't have restrictions and they should be based on trust and honesty
Who gets to decide who is mentally ill enough to be prohibited from reproducing? What about people having drug therapy for their conditions? The only issue I have is if the person is so mentally compromised, they cannot care for a child.
Mentally ill doesn’t mean incapable. Just because she has her own struggles, doesn’t mean she can’t be a great mother. Ever thought maybe it’s the situation with her father that made her so unwell?
I... I think they need sex and pleasures met but to be influenced maybe rather adopt in all honesty. Mentally ill is talking a very long range here. We could say the entire US is mentally ill and probably be pretty spot on
Nope, I believe Britney Spears has Bipolar cause her actions resemble one and there is no way she's on medications cause her actions wouldn't be acting the way she is
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(45 Plus)
+1 y
You know as a society we drive people crazy and then when they finally snapped you tell them what to do that's pretty cold that's just my opinion.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
51Opinion
No. They weaken the gene pool. Obvious by how disabilities, physical and mental, are increasing per population rate.
Just 100 to 200 years ago when social services and support did not exist mother nature & society would've kept most from reproducing as they'd have died young.
I believe the disability rate is increasing because of how children come up in the environments we are responsible for causing. Also the side effects of drugs altering their DNA strands in their parents or anywhere in the family tree.
For example, the crack cocaine epidemic birthed the ADHD period. Methamphetamine MDMA and similar uppers birthed the majority of bipolar and skizophrannia, but other disorders like bipolar, depression, anxiety are all mainly environmentally caused through PTSD, and yes, Kids can get PTSD easier, because their brains are being affected chemically due to survivalist reactions to their environment while it is still developing, causing their brain to chemically stimulate more frequently to "triggers".
Even people who used stuff like ecstasy while pregnant were studied and ended up with depression, because their brain cannot stimulate without the assisted amounts of dopamine.
This "Gene-Pool" science doesn't eliminate how we treat each other as human beings, and will not bring a change in the future of how we function til everybody grows up and treats each other right.
Remember, the Gene Pool science was Hitlers approach, and we see how hard he failed!!
@yoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyo That means less than shit for the increasing number of diseases that are inheritable such as physical illnesses
Physical illnesses are caused by child birth problems or failure to genetically fuse human DNA during conception of the child?
Down syndrome and diseases similar have to do with how the RNA in a Human Cell tells their body to reproduce chromosomes.
That same information can be damaged through irresponsible acts up the family tree and is often an adaptation to such acts. Heart problems or lung problems could be caffeine or smoking while pregnant, or drug use of uppers while pregnant.
If not the that birth defect is a problem with how they are birthed, then that's the hospitals fault, like most of the time blindness, and other diseases.
If you hate disabled kids that much, if you are afraid of them continuing or living their lives like normal society, then I hope you have a kid that's special so you can learn to love them properly.
Point being, until we have parents responsible enough to take care of themselves while pregnant, and until we have hospitals with more advanced procedures for taking care or babies after birth, and in the operating room, then we will continue having disabled kids.
So-called "sane" people regularly vote for autocrats, buy huge gas-guzzling cars despite global warming, etc. They drive recklessly. They listen to Imagine Dragons.
I think labeling someone "mentally ill" is such a manipulative and spiritually impoverished thing to do.
In the big scheme of things, it doesn't matter. Highly intelligent people almost never mate with such inferiors. Therefore, on average, their children will continue to be intelligent and successful. Granted, their percentage of the population may drop in our present developed economy. However, when extremely tough and difficult conditions occur and, in time, they almost certainly will, survival of the fittest will eliminate most of the very unfit and their children.
Depend on what it is.
Some isn't good for the child in recent time and creates longtime issues for the child because of how the parents behaves.
Some other is like previous and give them unpleasant inherited genes.
Then you have those that doesn't really matter unless they have attitude problems.
Just have a look at the attendees at a Prez-Pussy-Grabber / Mike Pillow-guy rally or event, ...& you tell me?
While I WOULD be in favor of Mentally Ill People NOT reproducing, that NEVER STOPPED DJT from doing the nasty deed leaving his progeny EVERYWHERE to accost us!
Plus WHO gets to decide? This is an oily slick slope for decision-making on deciding who gets REMOVED from the deepend of the human genepool!
I don´t know if she´s really mentally ill because I don´t know much about her case. If she is, I don´t think it´s a good idea because she can´t handle the consequences and that´s one of the things she shouldn´t do.
Everyone is on the spectrum. Everyone/anyone can get help. So yes, make as many babies as you want.
Most people with mental illness don’t have relatives with the same mental illness. Mental illness can run in families sometimes though, like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Mentally ill can vary from person to person. Brittney should marry whoever she wants to without judgment. If it a person with severe memory loss or something worse than it would be extremely stressful for the partner to deal with not only his/her problems but the partners problems as well. Point is that marriage shouldn't have restrictions and they should be based on trust and honesty
Britney spears is a whole story and that situation shouldn't be allowed at all.
I think you should have to take some test before having a child to see if you are fit enough to raise a human
I have been saying this for years.
Who gets to decide who is mentally ill enough to be prohibited from reproducing? What about people having drug therapy for their conditions?
The only issue I have is if the person is so mentally compromised, they cannot care for a child.
There are people who aren't diagnosed with any mental issues who can't even raise their kids right. :/
Mentally ill doesn’t mean incapable. Just because she has her own struggles, doesn’t mean she can’t be a great mother. Ever thought maybe it’s the situation with her father that made her so unwell?
I... I think they need sex and pleasures met but to be influenced maybe rather adopt in all honesty. Mentally ill is talking a very long range here. We could say the entire US is mentally ill and probably be pretty spot on
Brittany I think deserves a chance. Her life got fucked up. She's supposedly better now.
Demi Lovato on the other hand I constantly worry about
Speaking as someone with autism and high anxiety, no I am not. I do not want people running around with the same issues I had and have.
I don’t think Britney Spears should be under a conservatorship and she certainly should be allowed to have a kid.
Nope, I believe Britney Spears has Bipolar cause her actions resemble one and there is no way she's on medications cause her actions wouldn't be acting the way she is
You know as a society we drive people crazy and then when they finally snapped you tell them what to do that's pretty cold that's just my opinion.
From a male POV around 99.999% of women are crazy at some point. Some more often than others. So your question doesn't make sense.