Did the Bear who killed a woman in her tent deserve to be killed?

[Anonymous]

A lady was Camping, and a bear attacked her tent killing her, the local authorities then went all blood thirsty and set up a trap and the shot it dead.

Do you think the bear was rightfully shot or do Bear lives matter? #Blm
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/grizzly-bear-shot-dead-after-dragging-california-woman-from-her-tent-and-killing-her-in-montana-12352735

Yes the bear deserved to be killed

No the bear shouldn't have been shot

[molonski2]

Sorry , very sorry for family , BUT she is in the Bears territory , its like saying kill every shark.
Its not the fault of the BEAR , leave the animal alone ( too late for that of course ) .

[Asker]

I agree, it's not like the bear went inside her house

[molonski2]

No , it just smacked down a piece of nothing.

[SheerKiss3]

I agree

[Rangers]

Not it's fault for murdering an innocent person sleeping in a tent? You have a very interesting line of thinking, next you'll say Kyle Rittenhouse should've just laid down and taken it instead of defending himself like he did.

[Asker]

@Rangers it's nature, we're in their territory, stop being a typical over entitled Trump supporter.

And Rittenhouse was a 16 year old illegally carrying a gun. Do you also think Chauvin was innocent?

[molonski2]

@SheerKiss3
appreciate the view.

[neeeeeeeko]

Killing this bear was the right call because allowing it to live actually goes against preservation efforts. By killing the woman, the bear made contact with a human and may associate more humans as food or danger or something to be killed instead of something to be ignored. This would carry on to any offspring the bear has and if bears become more violent, more people would want to kill them.

[Asker]

So basically you think we should go around killing any animal that's a danger to. humans?

[neeeeeeeko]

No I think we should take realistic preservation efforts into account before making assumptions. This is why we "don't feed the bears"

[Asker]

We didn't feed the bear, the lady invaded the bears home. Big difference.

[neeeeeeeko]

That was an example

[neeeeeeeko]

Also I doubt the bear lives behind a post office

[andreasderjuengere]

Was that a Republican, or a Democrats bear?
I don't want to give a wrong answer here.

[Asker]

Not sure about the bear. But the human was probably a Trump supporter.

[andreasderjuengere]

It still could be a case of 'friendly fire'.
But as the case is unclear, it could be a first step to sue the Chinese, and to blame communism in general?

[grega239]

I guess yes , but then again why the fuck do people go camping in such areas.

I also have to wonder if the woman took any precautions to defend from such an attack and if she read anything on the topic. Or did she just pack a tent and went to the woods

[Anonymous]

Yeah, human blood is to predators as crack is to humans
Highly addictive and only fixable by death

[Asker]

That's bs

[Opinion Owner]

Cut yourself and jump in a tank of piranhas, clearly not BS is it

[Anonymous]

guarantee the bear didn't have a hunting permit for people, so yes it deserved to be killed. Rarely when animals kill a human, do they go back to leaving humans alone. They've been shown to start intentionally hunting people.

[Rangers]

Absolutely, kill 10 bears for that and now we're even.

[najekim]

Yes. Don't want wild animals developing a taste for humans.

[Dinosaursandanime65]

If they weren’t going to eat her then yes their death was justified.

[Anonymous]

I dont think it "deserved" to be killed.. but it had to be done. I agree with what Neko says in her comment.

[JesseJayNeak]

Did the bear support Trump? Or Biden?

[Asker]

Sources have said the bear supporterd Biden, the lady in the tent is rumored to be a Trump supporting "Karen" .

[JesseJayNeak]

Let's see how the media handles it

[Asker]

Fox News are calling for all Bears and wildlife to be killed instantly in retaliation.

[JesseJayNeak]

CNN counters with Kill All Karens