What do you think about outlawing all semi-automatic firearms in the U. S? (Page 3)

[Fuentes]

Thats not gonna happen

[userxvi]

you are the biggest loser on this website

[007kingifrit]

why do they push this beta male's posts to the top page every time?

[Agape93]

Fuck no

[888theGreat]

that would be a violation of the Constitution

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

Why does anyone in the general public need a semi or automatic handgun or rifle?

If you are defending your house - and not just using guns to boost a weak pathetic ego & compensating for little ball syndrome by seeming to be tough - there is absolutely no reason for the public to possess such weapons. No legal or law obeying reason that is.

An old smith & western police pistol will kill any intruder just as efficiently.

[888theGreat]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit Not if the criminal has two semi autos

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@888thegreat - and why would criminals with semi automatics be entering your house unless you're selling drugs? That IS the typical carrier of semis. Druggies, addicts, dealers & gangbangers.

[Wonderwhat]

@888thegreat you do realize the police don't do anything with their guns in those situations, right?

https://youtu.be/KgwqQGvYt0g

[888theGreat]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit another 34 year old that acts like a 14 year old

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@888thegreat - hmmm... Still superior to a supposed 53 year old with a 7% MHO on a form predominantly inhabited by teens. ROFL.

[888theGreat]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit 7% because no one likes hearing the truth like you

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@888thegreat - you haven't given a real answer, small dick. Just a bunch of nonsense that in real life rarely happens. The average home invader has a pistol. Dipshit.

[888theGreat]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit you would love to have mine , mine is better than none

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. Duhh doy. What you really believe is, an old musket will kill an intruder just as efficiently.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam A smith & western, idiot, isn't a musket. Shows how stupid you are.

[888theGreat]

@Lliam I think i know this person. She had another account a couple weeks ago I think. She likes to argue everything.

[Lliam]

@888thegreat. I'll bet her daddy was a cop. Otherwise she would have no idea what a "police special" is. She probably doesn't know that it's a S&W model 10. And I doubt if she's ever trained to fire one.
People like that just talk shit.

I like my old M-59 and my Sig P-220. My wife likes her Sig P-380.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam 97% accuracy bitch in simulated police settings near complete darkness. Dummies, fortunately not real humans, moving on pullies emulating a bank robbery. Had it been real, lead thug would've been dead with a bullet between the eyes.

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. Golly. All of a sudden you're sounding pretty blood thirsty for a gun control freak. LOL How big is YOUR dick?

I'm kinda cracking up over the "old" 1899 technology, though. Why not a 1872 Colt single action army? Hey, I'm not putting down revolvers. But I do prefer auto loaders. You know, early 20th century technology.

You're trying to rationalize your understanding of the value of guns with a desire to comply with what you have been told it is to have liberal values. I know other people like that. In the end, their arguments make no sense.

I have liberal values (not like today's woke liberal assholiness) but I never considered gun control to be liberal. True liberals (as opposed to Democrats) don't advocate stripping people of civil rights. Liberals believe in liberty and distrust authority.

Gun control is more fitting for racial bigots or supporters of the Patriot Act.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam Hm... Wherever did I say I was for gun control? I've owned guns since I was 16 & handled them when I was 12.

What I did was ask a question anyone with half a fuctioning brain would... why does the general public need semi or automatic weapons?

I've yet to see any real valid reason provided here. Rather, as is typical of gun totters, I seen loser upon loser upon loser commenting. With nothing of value. Because most pro-gun totters are losers.

Social rejects. Etc. They buy big trucks for the same reason they buy multiple or unnecessary guns. To compensate for their inferiority. They're weak. Chicken-livered & spaghetti-kneed.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

*18 i mean

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. ROFLMAO🤣🤣🤣 But you are not for gun control.
You're one of the most rabid gun control fanatics I've ever encountered.

A run of the mill, empty headed, hypocritical, mind controlled, dickless, hate filled, shrill, militant, jackboot authoritarnan-loving, modern so-called liberal. Which means that you're about as liberal as Hitler or Mao.
Go fuck yourself raw with your "old police special".

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam You are a fucking idiot. I asked why do public need semi and automatic guns. That is rabid gun control you fuckard. It's a logical question. MAN YOU ***ARE*** STUPID!! Kindly get snipped your genes are too weak to be added to the gene pool.

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. And stripping people of the ability to own a semiautomatic firearm isn't gun control? Most of the guns in existence today are semiautomatic. Oh yeah, let's ban them.

Jump start your brain cell, simpleton, I think it's dead.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam ROFL. Wherever have I said ban them you half-brained inbred idiot? I have ask is WHY do people need semi or automatic guns. ... Not ban. Why... Are you SO STUPID that your INCREDIBLY LOW IQ can NOT comprehend what I am saying?

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. Because you are an ignorant, abusive twat who can't express your thoughts clearly or respectfully. Typical for what passes as woke and "liberal" these days.

Nobody is obliged to justify why they prefer a semiautomatic. I'll take my Remington 1100 over a double barrel shotgun. And I'll take my Sig P-220 over your old.38. I don't care of you have a problem with that.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam ROFL. The only one who has been abusive is you > A run of the mill, empty headed, hypocritical, mind controlled, dickless, hate filled, shrill, militant, jackboot authoritarnan-loving, modern so-called liberal. < That was your uneducated ignorant response a while ago.

And mmm I've been pretty clear about what I've been asking for the last three to five responses. It is not my fault that your mother should've kept her legs closed when she met your father. Instead of birthing a child of such appallingly low comprehension.

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. You started right off talking about little ball syndrome. I wager you have rug munch syndrome.

[KitsuneFoxSpirit]

@Lliam What else to describe it except little dick syndrome? Hmmm. You and none of the in this post can actually answer my very, very simple question. ... It's the same sort of situation where people with inferiority complexes buy big trucks to make themselves feel special.

[Lliam]

@KitsuneFoxSpirit. That's what feminist dykes like you say, but prove it. You can't because you don't like cock.

What about the 24% of American women who own guns. And why are women one of the fastest growing demographics for training with guns and applying for conceal carry permits?
News flash: The vast majority are shooting semi-autos.

What about these national gun-rights organizations?
Liberal Rifle Association, Gun Loving Liberal, Liberals for Gun Rights, Democrats for Gun Ownership, Blue Steel Democrat, Pink Pistols, Armed Equality (LGBTQ), Women Against Gun Control, Mother's Arms, 1 Million Moms Against Gun Control, Liberty Belles, Babes with Bullets, Women's Firearm Network, A Girl & A Gun, Second Amendment Sisters, the National African-American Gun Association, Black Guns Matter, Brown Girls With Guns, ...

[DevinAM]

Makes no difference to me.

[globetrotter22]

Not happening.

[Crankor]

Pointless

[MountAverage]

It's a first step.

[Slim57]

Stupid and pointless

[JohnK123]

Yeah it is