Will Biden and the Democrats stack the court to get Abortion legal in all 50 states?

[888theGreat]

They may try , but can't with witch hunt of Trump going on.

Yes they will

No, they won't have time before elections

[BCRanger10]

No. He doesn't have time and he's about to lose the Senate. He doesn't really have it right now anyway (Joe Manchin).

[Cubus]

You think they're gonna lose the senate? They are sure to lose Houe, but wuth Senate I have fears.

[Guy13]

Yes and that’s what is riding on the mid-term elections. Economy is worse since Great Depression era.

[TimBush]

Yeth!

[WindAtMyBack]

They will certainly try. Democrats and Republicans alike have always tried to stack the court, and not just for the abortion issue.

To me that's the biggest negative of the abortion ruling. The court is not in the habit of overruling itself. It opened a whole can of worms by doing it. When the court starts flip flopping, which is the can of worms this opens, then the court loses a lot of respect and trust. Even though politicians select justices, the court is supposed to be neutral and not a political football.

I think it's almost a certainty that the court will once again overrule itself as soon as it stacks the other way. The integrity of the court is at stake. It will become far more politicized than it already was.

Fortunately justices have a habit of not ruling the way the appointing party expected them to. That might be the reason we haven't had more flip flops in the past.

As for stacking, the Democrats can put a LOT of blame on Ginsberg. She tried to play games. She could have retired when Obama was president. A lot of lawyers begged her to retire. A lot of Democrats begged her to retire. Obama himself begged her to retire.

She refused to retire while Obama was president. She thought Hillary would win the election so there was no hurry to retire. She refused to retire when it was a sure thing. Hillary didn't win, and she died while Trump was in office. If she had retired when everyone begged her too, if she had not been greedy, Roe vs Wade would not have been overturned.

[888theGreat]

no Republicans have never tried to stack the court , they have made selections to replace but never tried to add 15 seats like Democrats have.

[WindAtMyBack]

Oh, I didn't realize what you were referring to. When either party tries to put multiple justices on the court, it is called stacking the court.

It sounds like you are talking about actually increasing the size of the court. As far as I'm concerned, any politician who tries that should be impeached. If they really want to increase the size of the court, they should make it so it doesn't come into affect for a decent period of time. It definitely should not go into affect during the current Congress and administration who approved it. That's an extraordinarily dangerous precedence to set.

[Slartybartfast]

Republicans illegally withheld a SCOTUS nomination while two conservative justices LIED PUBLICLY UNDER OATH about it when questioned so I'd say it's perfectly fair.

Consider the number of justices was set at nine because there were nine circuit courts at the time (we now have 13) so we ready should have 13 justices anyway.

[Anonymous]

The Biden/Harris administration said they won't be doing this, it won't matter anyway, that can undo the overturning of a ruling, all they could do is make a new ruling after a case is brought forward and without no current supreme court precedent and no federal law there is no conflict, so there is no case for the supreme court to take up.

[888theGreat]

The House would do it

[Bratsondanielle]

I heard that if bite and sakes of s*** within 50 feet of the toilet the White House gives him a treat

[Likes2drive]

No why would he care , just because it was federally overthrown it’s still up to the states on what they want to do just like selling cannabis, it’s up to the states, it’s still not federally regulated either

[nawtee_me]

first off it is unconstitutional so they can not make laws to govern it. However the states can since it is not governed by the federal government. Some states will allow it and some will not.

[888theGreat]

No , they can , but Americans will throw them all out of office. Even Democrat Justices said that would not be good. Evil wins for a while , but not forever.

[888theGreat]

@supercutebutt Trump will be your President January 2025 . Like it , hate it it will be the case

[888theGreat]

No @supercutebutt No he was elected , just had it stolen by scum sucking Democrats

[888theGreat]

@supercutebutt I am aware many Trump votes were thrown out , illegals were allowed to vote , and machine votes were changed and many more added. Watch 2000 mules and learn something. Quit depending on bending over and taking it in the ass for living.

[888theGreat]

@supercutebutt who debunked 2000 mules? It has only been out 2 weeks. You mean your lying friends just said it was.

[supercutebutt]

www.reuters.com/.../fact-check-does-2000-mules-provide-evidence-of-voter-fraud-in-the-2020-u-s-presidential-election-idUSL2N2XJ0OQ

Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing
www.poynter.org/.../

[888theGreat]

@supercutebutt no he didn't because that testimony was years ago not recent.

[888theGreat]

@supercutebutt Reuters is a branch of the DNC , not fair or impartial news. Biased towards Democrats and out to get Trump.

[supercutebutt]

So the only news that is good is the news that Trump tells you. Got it. You are in a cult. :)

[WhitneySnow]

It was considered once before back during the 1930s

[FunkyMonkee]

I CERTAINLY don't support that motherfucking perverted twit but, it SHOULD be legal in ALL states!!

[Anonymous]

Pretty sure they'd need votes they don't have to do that.

Also, how would the witch hunt of Trump prevent it?

[BillyBalls]

Well, they have less than six months before The Republicans take over congress.

[RolandCuthbert]

He better stack this court. WTF?

The dems had better start fighting back or they will lose what is left of their base.

[888theGreat]

I am sure BLM is planning riots in a city near you

[RolandCuthbert]

I am sure you are jacking off with your pants around your ankles.

[Snsl153]

If they "lose their base" it will serve them right.

[888theGreat]

@Snsl153 who? Democrats?

[888theGreat]

I am sure you would enjoy watching me

[Snsl153]

Yes, I mean't the Democrats. I was responding to Roland.

[888theGreat]

@Snsl153 Yea, he has a crush on me I think. You see how he thinks of me naked.

[RolandCuthbert]

I would enjoy pounding you while you are screaming my name. You cream in our panties every time big daddy comes around.

:D

[exitseven]

they cannot pull it off.

[genericname85]

no. liberals hate individual autonomy.

[JohnK123]

Just like Trump did? He appointed three justices

[888theGreat]

because democrats killed one and the others died. Normal selection , not 15 socialists Democrats

[JohnK123]

There’s only 9 justices I don't know how u got 15

[888theGreat]

stacking the court making them 21 total, no wonder idiots like you elect idiots like Biden

[JohnK123]

U don’t need 21 to stack a court of 9 people, 5 being Republican

[888theGreat]

I see now a stupid ass kid , now I understand , it would be like talking to Biden.

[JohnK123]

Lmao u don’t need 16 Democrats against 5 republicans for 21 haha
U only need 7

[888theGreat]

Go back to playing with your GI Joes

[JohnK123]

Lmao Alr boomer

[888theGreat]

Boomer is not my age group. Again a dumb kid and i doubt if college will help either , if you can get into college

[JohnK123]

Oh lol I’m going out of state so that should prove I’m smart. The dumb kids stay at their dumb local ones which u prob did. Or u went to the south and adopted you

[Iokhm]

Eventually