Will leftist take responsibility for their support of violence against conservatives that cost Charlie kirk his life?

[Anonymous]

[Hardon-Collider]

That's a demand born of Ahrimanic thinking. It's based on a misunderstanding of how responsibility and karma work. The living can't apologize for a deed that was committed against the dead. The dead are in their own sphere of learning, and they can't be held accountable by the living. The responsibility lies with the individual actors. The living have their own work to do: to learn from the event and change their ways. That's the only responsibility that matters.

[LiamJHayden]

I am of the mind that people are responsible for thir own actions. I am appalled at those who celebrate, just as I'd be appalled if the victim had possessed the opposite views. Violence is warranted to preserve and protect, not to settle arguments.

[Anonymous]

Doubtful. They never take responsibility for any of their actions. Ever. Remember the blm riots that cost billions and cost hundreds of lives were just peaceful protests..

[Amy10223]

Right, we never take responsibility for any of our actions. What were those actions, exactly? Y+If anything we have been very quiet since the orange orangutan took office. If you do insist there are many-- maybe they took lessons from Trump, who hasa gotten away with plenty.

[Opinion Owner]

Lady.. I was there during the leftist blm riots. You know, the summer where career criminal, child rapist, wife beater, drug dealer, George Floyd, overdosed and died during a police action. Where blm and antifa felt it necessary to burn cities, murder innocents, and destroy property. But you leftists called it peaceful protests.. Where my uncle died because he refused support blm, so they broke into his pawn shop and killed him..

Unless you have lost someone to leftist bullshit you will never understand. Now stfu child, the adults are talking.

[AngryCarl2]

Only one man is responsible: the man who pulled the trigger.

[genericname85]

i mean is it a known fact that this was a "leftist" who murdered him? or was it just someone that hated him personally? isn't it a bit too early to make these sorts of conclusions?

[Amy10223]

This is what Trump is saying, so that the word is spreading fast. www.nbcnews.com/.../charlie-kirks-death-prompts-outpouring-shock-grief-condemnations-polit-rcna230472

[genericname85]

@Amy10223 i mean i do think he is right about the left wing rhetorics that are hatefull and incite violence. but i have a hard time seeing a causal connection in this particular case unless the murderer turns out to be a left wing extremist.

[Hardon-Collider]

i heard that the fbi found trans rights messages in the ammunition. is that true or not? even then of course you could suspect that these messages were planted by a hateful rightwinger to blame the left... but that does not matter. MSNBC fired that dumbass for a reason. He took his lefty job of spreading hate too seriously.

[Amy10223]

I don't see left wing "rhetoric" at all; I see truth in what they say. In contrast, it is Trump who has successfully divided the country into "left" and "right". No other president in the history of the US has ever called people rightists and leftists, as far as I know. If anything-- I feel the right, who tolerate Trump and his antics, rhetoric, and so on-- side with anything he does or says--as in this video. They didn't say or do squat when Melissa Hortman, former Democratic state representative was shot and killed laong with her husband and their Golden Retriever; they cared little about Nancy Pelosi's husband being attacked in his own home by a madman; they didn't say anything when the Congressman Alex Padilla of California was handcuffed for no apparent reason other than trying to ask a question when Kristi Noem was giving a speech. Put on the ground and handcuffed. Nothing at all happened then--so who are really the radical ones here? The leftistss have been quiet for far too long.

[genericname85]

@Amy10223 oh you've not seen a lot of left wing antifa extremist rhetoric then. they basically have that thing going of: what he said was hatefull and it "hurt" a lot of people and therefore "hurting them" (with violence not words in this case) would be appropriate. i think that's what trump is referring to. but again. i don't see the connection to this particular case so i think trump is full of shit drawing that connection.

[genericname85]

@Hardon-Collider in the ammunition? what? xD but yeah anyway i think there's a lot of blaming back and forth. that's the political game that has been played for centureis to stop people from uniting against those who are "really" in power and doing the evil shit.

[Anonymous]

They never do so we have to hold them responsible, may they all get fired and have the day they deserve

[RedInnocent69]

No, because they’re not. Violent rhetoric begets violence. Funny how the right aren’t celebrating Kirk by quoting all the assinine things he said…

[Asker]

What violent rhetoric?

[RedInnocent69]

Hmmm, how about stoning gay people is God’s perfect law…

[Asker]

You mean free Palestine?

[RedInnocent69]

No, more like, there is no such thing as Palestine or Palestinians, they don't exist

[Anonymous]

this is fucking hilarious. Now all of a sudden, only the person who pulled the trigger is responsible, but when they want to blame Trump for every time a conservative gets violent... different story. 🤣

[jshm2]

LOL, it's the right wing who shot him, dumbass.

[Asker]

Nope leftist. "Hello facist " on the bullet

[jshm2]

You need new fucking spectacles, then.

[Anonymous]

I love Tyler's Team Trump shirt lol

[Staximus]

Of course not

[seeyounexttuesday]

They will never.