Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Ever since George Floyd's murder the democrats have been acting like a bunch of crazy people! Where were these crazy people before then? It's like they all came out of the woodwork at one time and it hasn't stopped.
These people are so full of hate for Donald Trump that they can't turn off their hate even though he is no longer our President. I often wondered what America would be like once Trump was no longer in the White House. Now I see two and a half years later, it's worse!!! They are still so full of hate that when Trump was no longer in office, they had to find new ways to keep their hate going. Now look at what they've done to America 🇺🇸. It's turned into a third world country. Maybe they didn't hate Trump after all. Perhaps they are just a bunch of crazy asses that hate everything! They are so miserable with themselves that they have to find things to destroy still. They tried to destroy and the people on the right, but that didn't work. So now, they hate America and are doing everything they can to destroy the people and America. Their hate and discontent won't stop. It didn't stop when Biden became President. So begs the question. What will it take for them to stop their hate of everything?
Speaking of George Floyd, what happened to him should not have happened.
However, Floyd was directly responsible for his own death.
The left will never admit that.
He resisted arrest, struggled in the police car, and did not comply with going into the back of the police car. He started flipping out and was struggling and trying to crawl out and saying he was claustrophobic.
He obviously didn’t deserve to have someone kneel on his neck when he was already on the ground and no longer struggling, but he could have just complied. The cops have you. Johnny Law is there. You’re getting arrested and detained and put in lock up. If you resist they will use force.
George Floyd would still be alive today if he just exercised his right to remain silent and complied with the officer’s commands. It’s not a difficult thing to do. I learned to obey men with badges and guns when I was 5.
First, he a committed a crime that resulted in the encounter with the police.
Second, he had a deadly amount of fentanyl in his system. Even if he did not encounter the police that day, he probably would have died of an overdose.
"These people are so full of hate for Donald Trump that they can't turn off their hate even though he is no longer our President..."
Has Trump conceded the election, yet?
"What will it take for them to stop their hate of everything?"
It's not hate of everything. Having Trump admit that he's been lying about the election and he lost fair and square would help a bit. Having the Republican establishment stand up to Trump and tell him in no uncertain terms that he lost the election and he should shut up and go away would be better. Not having over a hundred lawmakers being on board with stealing the choice of president away from the people would help. Having Republican voters stand up to their "leaders" and tell them that protecting the constitution is more important than winning the presidency would help.
Since none of that is going to happen, people are reasonably frustrated. But they're not crazy.
'billyballs' I feel the same way, and he should not have died like that, but it just never seems to stop, even with Obama still commenting on it, and he black slaughter continues in Chicago/ Baltimore et cetera, it seems that THOSE black lives DON"T matter as much as those lost involving law enforcement.
Are you really trying to suggest that reading out the acceptance speech Clinton had ready for 2016 undoes the concession speech she gave on Nov 8th 2016?
Stacey Abrams lost an election where her opponent was in charge of the election, including who could vote (he tossed 200,000 people off the voter rolls "because they'd moved", only problem was that they hadn't). What kind of country allows someone to oversee their own election?
@Agagagagaga I graduated from Station 18, Orange County Sheriffs Dept. and I too, learned to comply with what Law Enforcement says, but have never been detained for anything, as I do not do 'stupid' as most of law abiding people. To the degree, you suggest, he did contribute to his death, by not complying, and in retrospect, they COULD have restrained him more effectively than they did in causing his death. I would have probably Tasered him rather than putting the knee in his neck.
All water under the bridge. We can't undo it.
@Bricealan So? Did Clinton concede in 2016, or not? Did Trump concede in 2020, 2021, or 2022?
Mueller expressly said that they did not prove than Trump did not collude, and got convictions for obstruction of justice. There's no need to obstruct justice if there's no crime. As for the cost, it was half of what Republicans spent in the 1990's trying to impeach Clinton for lying about an affair.
@Bricealan Nope, he was impeached for lying to a federal agent about a matter completely irrelevant to their "investigation". Looking back, the impeachment was bullshit, but things would probably have been better if they'd convicted because then Al Gore would have coasted to a win in 2000 with the Republican party being shown as putting party above country and Gore being the incumbent.
@exitseven I'm sure that has nothing to do with the knowledge that the Republican party from top to bottom tried to steal the presidency in 2020.
@goaded Once again, you are wrong. Mueller said there was NO evidence of collusion/conspiracy with the Russians and Trump's campaign. There were never any convictions for obstruction of justice. The most Mueller's team came up with was a non decision on whether or not Trump obstructed justice, which is unprecedented for a prosecutor! Either he did or he didn't. Again, where do you get your information?
@Slingblade1126 Do you not understand English? Insufficient evidence to prove something is not "NO evidence". And Roger Stone was charged and convicted of witness tampering, obstructing an official proceeding, and five counts of making false statements. I don't think he was the only one, but you're going to ignore facts in favour of lies anyway.
"Former special counsel Robert Mueller pushed back against U. S. President Donald Trump’s characterizations of his 22-month investigation, telling lawmakers on Wednesday that he did not evaluate “collusion” with the Russian government, and confirming that his report did not conclude that there was “no obstruction” of the probe.
“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.
“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”"
www.politico.eu/.../
@goaded Stone was convicted for obstructing a HOUSE investigation! It had NOTHING to do with Mueller's investigation. No one, I repeat NO ONE has been convicted of obstruction of justice as a result of Mueller's investigation. During Mueller's own testimony and in his own report, he stated that "collusion and conspiracy will be synonymous" With his own wording, he made collusion a legal term. There was no proof of conspiracy! How do I know? Was anybody from Trump's administration charged? In your own incoherent reply you wrote. "Mueller expressly said that they could not prove Trump didn't collude". BULL SHIT! Mueller only tried to prove Trump did collude. That is law 101!! As for obstruction, if anyone on my staff wrote me a referral like that, they would be terminated. Mueller never fulfilled his obligation as a prosecutor. Either you have the evidence or you don't! It was unprecedented what he did! A prosecutor doesn't exonerate people.
@Bricealan Because the original offense had nothing to do with the investigation and "sex" can quite reasonably mean penis-in-vagina. I already said that it would have been better to convict, leading to 10 years of President Gore, and quite likely no 9/11. He wouldn't have turned around and given the surplus away to the rich like Bush did.
Hey, you found one example of a Democrat saying something stupid two years ago. How many Republican leaders have used the word "groomer" in the last year or so? What do you think should happen to paedophiles? So what do you think is going to happen to some poor sod who gets accused of being a "groomer" (without any evidence, of course)?
@Philyouup (That last one was to @billyballs)
@goaded Page 180 volume 1 of Mueller's report, last paragraph. It also continues into page 181. He talks about Federal case law and legal definitions in which "collusion and conspiracy" are synonymous. Although, he went on to say he only investigated "conspiracy", the investigation is already tainted. You CAN'T give case law that the two terms are synonymous and then say you only investigated one term (conspiracy) as a crime. That's when I knew, that not only didn't he write the report, he didn't even read it. It's pretty clear on Rep. Collins cross examination. Honestly, I don't know how to link. It's easy to find. Also, don't tell me you care about the truth! I quote, "Mueller expressly said they did not prove that Trump didn't collude". That's a lie. Also, you used the word "collude".
@Slingblade1126 "That's when I knew, that not only didn't he write the report, he didn't even read it."
Oh, come on.
The report, incidentally, "chronicles dozens of contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia, as well as 10 potential instances of obstruction of justice by Trump".
From the paragraph you mention: "collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the U. S. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law", and the very next paragraph: "For that reason, this Office’s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term “collusion.”" (p. 181)
That's the opposite of saything they "will be synonymous". He's saying he's interpreting his mandate to investigate "collusion" as a mandate to investigate the crime of conspiracy. Which matches up exactly with his statement I quoted earlier, pushing back on Barr and Trump's lies:
"Former special counsel Robert Mueller pushed back against U. S. President Donald Trump’s characterizations of his 22-month investigation, telling lawmakers on Wednesday that he did not evaluate “collusion” with the Russian government, and confirming that his report did not conclude that there was “no obstruction” of the probe.
“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.
“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”"
www.politico.eu/.../
Fortunately leftists are incompetent. I would rather have a left wing mass shooter than a right wing one, mostly because the odds of survival are higher
@Philyouup but true. Leftists are generally failures when they try mass shootings
u Sarah Palin used a bullseye symbol over a picture of Rep. Gabby Giffords D-AZ to suggest she should be a target in the 2012 election. When Jared Lee Loughner shot her in 2011, the liberals were quick to blame Palin and suggest that she should be indicted for solicitation for attempted murder.
So. . . is the left now going to insist that Chuck Schumer be indicted? If not, what's the difference?
This simply illustrates the consequences of the ever increasing use of incendiary language and the absence of civility and respect in contemporary American politics. . . and the Main Stream Morons should shoulder much the blame for our current state of affairs!
Thanks for MHO!
It's on pretty much every outlet's website, pretending otherwise is just dumb. Also, congratulations on finally getting a counter-example to the Buffalo shooting that killed 10. A lone man who apparently called the police on himself and never fired a shot.
https://www.msnbc.com/jose-diaz-balart/watch/armed-man-arrested-near-justice-brett-kavanaugh-s-home-141691973790
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/08/us/brett-kavanaugh-threat-arrest.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/08/kavanaugh-threat-arrest-justice/
Nope!
The liberal lunatic went chicken shit when he saw ARMED Federal Marshalls guarding Kavanaugh's home.
Ya see!!!
A good guy with a gun prevented a killing of a man and his family.
Oh, it's been pointed out that it might be too early to politicise a gun crime. Let us know when enough time has passed since 19 small children and a couple of their teachers were massacred, decapitated, and after a couple of weeks (maybe months, since no gun was fired, and nobody was hurt) we might want to do something about people who are likely about to negatively affect the lives tens of millions.
Can't Kavanaugh simply do what Blasey Ford had to? Go into hiding.
Opinion
20Opinion
Hardly any mention of this on the fake news. Nobody is calling for Schumer's resignation either. By tomorrow the fake news will be concentrating on Captain Kangaroo and his court.
God do they ever love their fucking kangaroo court. It’s all such a shameless show trial. All of the media outlets are creaming themselves over the upcoming televised “trial.”
Speaking of Captain Kangaroo...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg1di8sGxWc
My wife's sister graduated from college a few years ago. They had Bob Keeshan (the Captain himself) as a speaker. I saw him get on the stage. He was mostly bald and did not have his signature haircut so I was not sure it was him. I got out of my seat and took a walk closer to the stage to get a better look. As I got up there he did a mike check and I could hear that familiar baritone. I said "Wow, it's really him" to nobody in particular. He looked towards me and said "Yes, it's really me."
Right Wingers killed over 329 people in the past 25 years, including blowing up a building killing 168 people in 1994. And most recently murdering 10 people in Buffalo New York. But one person, whose political views you don't even know, threatens a judge everyone on the left is violent? lmao, you guys are so ridiculous.
https://www.businessinsider.com/right-wing-extremists-kill-329-since-1994-antifa-killed-none-2020-7
Where are your facts to come up with 329 people? And only 329? In 25 years? The left has been forcing such harsh vaccine mandates.. that people have been scared out of their minds of losing their jobs that they get a unsafe vax that has killed... almost a million people in 2 years! Yet Biden doesn’t care how many people the vaccine company kills. And you know why? Because he’s being controlled by idiots like Fauci who own patents on Covid vaccines and he gets paid on those patents every-time someone gets a shot :).. see why the left wants mandates? Because then Fauci gets rich 🤑
@hellomellow7 The facts are reported in the link I posted dummy.
Now post a link from a credible source supporting your ridiculous claim the vaccine has killed 2 million people lol.
My god, you are so divorced from reality with this conspiracy theory bullshit.
@hellomellow7 fake account talking that insanity.
I’m not calling you names for your opinion, so why are you calling me names? Obviously your immature and close minded to exploring information that contradicts yours. And why don’t you check out The Childrens Health Defense website, he’s interviewed hundreds of people who have worked for the cdc, worked in hospitals. Or google the Highwire. Or Del Bigtree who’s also interviewed several people.
@hellomellow7 So in other words you can't provide a link to a credible source to prove your claim that millions of people have died from the covid vaccine. Instead you just point me to conspiracy theory nonsense from uncredible Quacks.
What's it like being so divorced from reality where everything you believe his lies and bullshit?
Probably a bot. That looks like a bot response.
It’s def not a she. It’s an xper lvl 1 and the way it writes resembles a bot/spam account. You see them all the time on social media and are fairly easy to setup.
Look at what it follows. Other bots.
https://www.girlsaskguys.com/user/mattiacecchinato
ChefPapiChulo you’re dilussional
And i haven’t been on here long enough to share links so you can stop being a jerk.
@hellomellow7 you haven't been here long enough and you're already spreading obvious fake propaganda about vaccines. that is a red flag for a bot/spam account.
I’m not a bot. Are you really that in competent? And it’s not fake propaganda start googling what I’m talking about. I’ve done my research I wrote a whole thesis paper about this topic. And how is it “obvious propaganda” you are really dillusional.
Hey shit for brains - The vast majority of shooters in the USA have been right wing nuts. But that's not really the point, is it? Yet, you stupidly try to put blame on the Dems for the acts of sick people?
Wake the fuck up Billy. For once in your short, ignorant life, realize that this kind of violence has nothing to do the political parties themselves, but rather the loonies who interpret their purpose will malcontent.
To be fair, the right also plotted to murder a governor, another plotted to kill several media personalities and congress members, a mob tried to stop a legitimate election and even held signs saying to hang Mike Pence.
The violent members of all political groups are always going to be fringe. The lefts crazies and the rights crazies never represent the main body politic.
They'll never admit it because the loons are useful tools to them and incite them.
And we just had some dumbass Democrat start a thread here on GAG the other day claiming "righties" are violent.
I think there's a lot of violent idiots willing to die or kill others for their beliefs. I don't think it's exclusive to any one political ideology.
I will say that certain decisions made by the government should be met with reprisal. If governments limit the rights of its citizens then those citizens should rebel. Even if they "peacefully" take away rights that's still a violent act against the people and their way of life. Very few dictators go quietly into the night.
You mean as opposed to the right wing which stormed the capitol and attempted to murder a bunch of politicians, first among them the vice president himself?
As opposed to the 500 plus riots in 2020 that were "peaceful protests" after George Floyd died?
The rioters of 2020 killed people.
The rioters of January 6killed no one.
In Portland, the rioters took over several city blocks and declared sovereignty over the area. That is that textbook definition of "insurrection.
Not really. The people in Portland had no intention of overthrowing the government or actually becoming independent. They were simply using it to send a political message which would be pointless if they were no longer US citizens at the end of the day. It is just a small political stunt as opposed to the very real traitors rushing into the capitol.
They burned government buildings and took over a police`. The police station may have been Seattle... I forget.
Still an assault on a government building.
the right is dangerous and considered by law enforcement to be a real domestic threat. There isn’t even anything close on the left. unless you want to believe the wacked right narrative
Pure Genius!!!
Not true. Only by left wing.
They won't admit it even after a judicial assassination takes place. They'll just gladly fill the vacancy.
@Bricealan There hasn't' been yet--but we're up to an attempt. A dude was trying to kill Cavanaugh. He was caught.
"There is no truth but power." The sooner non-leftists realize what they're dealing with the sooner we can find a solution.
Why does it have to be one or the other? There are SOME aggressive and violent people on both sides.
True.
But the Democrats and the media will not admit to it!!
He was pissed at the SCOTUS most likely abolishing Roe V. Wade. He went to the home of a Conservative justice. He is from California.
Given those facts he is most likely to be a Left Loony.
Plus, Chuckie Schumer once stood on the steps of the Supreme Court and called out the names of Trump appointed Justices and said there would be a a price to pay!!
The same ones looting, torching and threatening are the same ones calling for total gun confiscation and police defunding
he wasn't a member of the left. but here's a far more important question: is it okay to only offer thoughts and payers to ordinary people but demand action for your powerful friends? this piece of shit gets no warm fuzzies from me!
They're a group of clowns in a circus 🤡🎪🤡🌈🏳️🌈🤡🤡🎪
I love that you think the lamestream media ain't covering this yet somehow you found out.
He was only carrying a gun near his the judges house…I thought that more guns made us safe?
Law abiding citizens who honor our 2A don't use guns to make threats in an aggressive manner or to scare people. That's what we call unresponsible and a criminal & he just happens to be a leftist reject proving everyone elses point that guns do keep us safe from maniacs like that because someone is so crazy they will come to your house over a judgement descission. Just think what would have happen if nobody had guns? Maniacs like that would find a way and come after thise who can't protect themselves.
They won't because they need those people free to perpetuate their genocide against anyone who doesn't subscribe to the cult
The same reason Republicans will not admit it. Doing so would be bad politics
This just never stops, and never will.
The democrats will never admit to being violent.
@Philyouup
You mean like the Democrat that Shot up the Republicans at the Baseball Park practicing for a Charity event?
You mean like the Democrat who locked himself in to the suite in Vas Vegas, broke out the Window and started shooting everybody at the Country Western Music Concert because he thought everybody that liked Country Western Music was a Republican?
Or are you talking about the Shooter In Buffalo who was a Eco-socialist who hated Fox News, and the Conservative Commentator Ben Shapiro.
Or are you talking about the Democrat that Shot up the gay bar in Florida?
Or are you talking about the kid who shot up the School in Sandy Hook who parents were solid Democrats.
Or how about the Kids in Columbine who were raised by Democrats.
What about the Riots in Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, and Ferguson Missouri, All led by Democrats?
@fireforeffect
Stop it!!!
Pointing out facts to a Democrat is a waste of time!!
Did I forget to mention that the shooter at the Aurora Colorado Movie Theater was an "Occupy Wall Street" leftist?
@Philyouup Yes, 1 in 209 is a Republican. But even that is an exaggeration.
@Philyouup
You are projecting.
@Philyouup
You seem to have issues / problems with telling the truth.
@Philyouup
Now you are projecting
loaded question.
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions