Hmmm 1st wife spent more than we earned, next stole my sperm cause she wanted a baby - regardless if we could afford one, next girlfriend, was so poor it wasn't funny,... after that i said fuckit and just whored around myself for 10yrs... met second wife... who only wanted a baby- who knew i was fixed... asked me to get unfixed... and again didn't care she had 100k in school debt... and i wanted to buy a self-storage... first... to have financial stability... then i woulf have done that for her... she divorced me cause i wouldn't do that...
She met a guy, married him, got knocked up, he relasped to rehab, cheated, stole 14k from joint account...
Meanwhile, i changed jobs making 25% more, bought, her out of our marital home, paid off all debt, bought a used BWM, a self storage, a paving company, a hydroseed company, and a landscape company, got my CDL and make 100hr driving it... if i wanted to retire i could have...
And that was all done starting just 3 years after our divorce...
i understand women not wanting to date a guy if he has no career, no occupational track that will put him in a position to support a family. However, I agree tha women who hold out for whoever has the most money are gold diggers and whores.
Not necessarily. If it is a synonym for sex, then yes.
However, if I'm going to date someone long term, he needs to be financially stable and should be able to support himself. I could be politically correct and say that money does not matter, but it does. Love does not pay the bills. I would date someone who is poor BUT working towards their goal or is hardworking. I'd never date an aimless slacker who depends on me to pay for everything.
If I hear someone say they'd date someone because of that person's financial status I imagine it as a reason to to get to know that person and find out if there's more than money to look for.
Dating in my eyes is getting to know someone and building a relationship slowly with that person. Not just sex. Sure it's sad if a financial gain is the only thing
I don't agree. Women take a huge risk investing years/ and pregnancy into a guy- if he's not able to support/ provide for her she'd be stupid to get involved with him. Now, if her only requisite is that he's "rich" then she's shallow, but not a prostitute- an immoral, spoiled and corrupt creature.
2
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
1 y
Dating a girl because of her beauty and body is also called prostitution. :) If you're selfish enough to lead on beautiful girls, use their body for sex then they deserve half of your money. You pigs have a weakness of not being able to resist sex and love manipulating women. We know your tricks so better to find someone who is not a worthless pig and pay us in return. Simple.
Lol, yeah, if that's exclusively the reason. But prostitution also takes a lack of emotional connection.
I think it's possible to get with someone namely for their money, but (if both parties are open to it) develop into a legitimate and loving relationship.
You can call it whatever you like. Dating is a marketplace. We're all trying to make the best deal we can. Some are more attractive than others and have more choices. Wealth is more attractive than poverty. Why should women with a choice choose a wealthy man over a poor man, other things being equal? Of course other things are never equal and a wealthy man can turn out to be a poor choice.
I mean yeah. It's pretty accurate. There was a girl I just got into an argument with earlier on this app. And she said it's the man's job to provide and pay for her meals and everything. She's basically a prostitute in my opinion. And the guy isn't even getting the full package either because she doesn't sleep with him whenever he wants.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
1 y
By this logic traditional submissive housewifes are prostitutes because they look for a man who is financial stable. So now housewifes are prostitutes which I heard a lot by mgtow incels but also working women are feminazis aka modern women which I heard a lot by gag incels. Lol
1
24 Reply
Opinion Owner
1 y
So wtf you want? I swear you
I prefere to pay my own shit but i would not date a lazy man.
Men dont simultaneously say both things. Some men say one thing and some men say the other thing. Decide what goes with your own views and then only date men from that pool. This is what i as a man do as well. The problem i see many women have that men dont have as much is that women are not consistent or principled with how they do this. They like conservative alpha types yet complain why he is not softer or a feminist. Or they date a feminist man and then complain why he doesn't take charge and act in control or be aggressive. Or some other similar thing. Men sometimes do this too but not nearly to the same extent I've seen. I dont think a housewife is a prostitute and i do think career women are low value therefore i only date women who want to be a housewife. Many womens logic works like this: i want a man who values equality and egalitarian roles and i want a man who does traditionally masculine things and has the masculine role as a provider. The pool of men that are both is zero since its mutually exclusive in practice. He must have money yet value your money. Which the more he makes the less he values yours. The less he makes the more he values yours. Its opposite.
"Majority of working women want men like them lol" this is my whole point. I said "the more he makes the less he values yours. The less he makes the more he values yours." This is just common sense. Does a homeless man value $10 more or less than Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk?
Wtf lol. Being financially independent is a survival skills. I dont get you. I said Working women who want men like them aka both pay bills. So wtf are you speaking about
So simply just date guys who agree with you. I'm not sure why its so difficult to understand or why many women who believe like you do insist on dating men who don't agree with that.
Tf are you talking about? I did not say the opposite. This is why I say working women want men LIKE THEM which means she wants a man with similar values aka who agree with her
@ssam..."Yes when husband come at home even if you're not ready you have to spread legs for him as a private prostitute oops I mean as a wife. Lol" - do what you want with your husband. Why are telling me what you do with with your husband. I am not interested in your sex life. But interesting to know that you spread your legs like prost. even though you are not ready. So you are into bdsm? You know i dont want to know it
Its possible. Im only trying to address in your original post where you say "So now housewifes are prostitutes which I heard a lot by mgtow incels but also working women are feminazis aka modern women"
I wouldn't be quite that black and white about it but yes. If she finds out he makes say twice what she thought he did and all of a sudden he becomes cuter. That tells you a lot about her. But many of the young women on G@G you'll never get them to realize that this really does make them gold diggerish. They truly believe this is legitimate. There's really nothing you can do when someone doesn't get that they are a bad person.
If we want to help a man, you don't blame the golddigger. You blame him for making a bad decision. Because expecting the world to be free of golddiggers is unrealistic. Expecting a man to be able to make better choices is more realistic.
hypergamy and prostitution is a sad truth but itâs just the world works. In the animal kingdom itâs been shown in studies of monkeys where the females literally traded sex for food and safety from the alpha males.
Home > Dating > Questions > Gagers what is your take on this awesome quote: "dating a guy because of his financial status is also called prostitution"?
