
Can people (romantically) like multiple people at once?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
NO. I liked this guy while I “liked” my boyfriend. I started liking the guy before I met my boyfriend, When I met him, i thought i stopped liking the other dude, I realized not a long time ago I never loved my boyfriend. I'd always feel butterflies when the other guy would be near me or anything, thing I never felt with my boyfriend, I just needed someone to love me and give me attention. This has happened me many times (not with bfs) but I don't remember other examples, for which I think "pol¡am0rous" people are pointless, they just want two bodies or are surely confused, someone in love can't think about two people at once, definitely some people would think "oh but I sometimes think about X and sometimes about Y" Yeah that's what happened to me. I loved how he treat me, not him, eventually he started being a jerk and I stopped loving him and even if the other guy was a jerk sometimes I never stopped liking him.
Conclusion of my life (u can skip if u don't care):
Right now, I'm still with my boyfriend faking to love him because he has developed something called anxious attachment I think and well, everytime I'd tell him I wanted to leave the relationship he'd be extremely sad and would stop crying like a little baby, he's had su¡c¡dal past and sometimes I left him (we broke up multiple times) he tried k¡ll¡g himself
Well maybe slightly.. but it comes with so many problems and usually there's a favorite.
I don't know why people think it's okay to like multiple people at once. It's wrong in my opinion. It's different if you're in a dating stage where you are weeding out potential suitors then I understand. But if you like multiple people and think it's okay to do that, it's giving a mixed message, it is mixed signals. Eventually, and I see more modern day girls do this far too often where a girl will care only about herself and she won't care if she showed attraction, flirting tactics and then act cold with that guy and show the other guy more interest when the guy she acted cold with didn't do anything wrong. Girls, it's simple, why hurt guys emotionally. If you like one particular guy then flirt with him.
But the problem is, girls want to have options 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc. for just in case purposes. Because women don't want to be hurt but they don't care if they dish out the hurt. To any female reading this don't pull that ish. Y'all gloat how you are soo smart with your emotions then pursue that ONE guy and if he breaks your heart because he was a player and didn't care about you or he bad mouthed your family or whomever or whatever, then take responsibility, own up to it and realize to go after a genuine guy.
When you are romantically linked to someone, you think about them all day. You talk to them all the time, text them all the time. Going by this, you literally don't have time to get romantically linked with a different person. Now if you are attached to 2 people, you should know the feelings are different than romance.
Opinion
74Opinion
Can you "romantically like" more than one person at the same time. Are you talking about love?
Some people put a very casual definition on "love" so that they can justify being in an open or "polyamorous" relationship. For me - and I don't really GAF what other people think - being in love with my fiancee means that I want to spend EVERY day and night (not half of all the days and nights) for the rest of my life with her. I want her to be the center of my universe, and I want to be the center of her universe. There is only room for one person in the center.
In my opinion, if someone says they love two people at the same time, then they don't really love either one.
No, and if they think they do, they're deceiving themselves
ITBP jawan dies in Naxal blast; sluggish polling in Chhattisgarh
An ITBP jawan was killed in a moist IED blast in chhattisgarh during the second phase of voting. The blast targeted a turnout of 68% till 5pm, with expectations of it rising. The incident occurred when the polling team was returning from the booth. The injured jawan was taken to hospital but Couldn’t be saved. Reinforcements were sent to rescue the polling officials. The highest turnout was in Kurud constituency at 82.6%.
RAIPUR
An ITBP jawan was killed in a Maoist IED blast while escorting a polling party in Gariaband district of Chhattisgarh on the second and final phase of voting in Chhattisgarh on Friday. The state reported a modest turnout of 68% till 5pm, but it was expected to rise.
Police say Maoists triggered an IED explosion in Bade Gobra village of Gariaband, around 100km from Raipur, to target a polling party of 50 officials and security personnel.
An area covering nine police stations in Gariaband is the only Maoist-affected area to go to the polls in the second round. Voting got over at 3pm in these parts and the incident took place when the team was returning from the booth after voting was over in Bindranawagarh (ST) constituency.
The polling party had walked 3km from the booth when head constable Joginder Singh stepped on a camouflaged mine and took the full brunt of the blast. No one else got injured, said ASP DS Patel. He was taken to hospital but couldn't be saved. Singh was a native of Jammu & Kashmir.
Reinforcements were rushed to rescue the terror-struck polling officials, who had taken refuge in Mainpur police station, a short distance from the attack site.
Polling started slow in most parts of the 70 constituencies but picked up in the afternoon. Around noon, it stood at 40%. Kurud constituency had the highest turnout of 82.6% at 5p, followed by Kharsia at 81.4% and Sanjari Balod and Pali Tanakhar at 79.3% each. Urban areas had lower turnouts, with Raipur City South at the bottom with 52.1% polling.
IMINATES NDER
Chief minister Bhupesh Baghel cast his vote in Patan, while his deputy T S Singhdeo voted in Ambikapur. State BJP president Arun Sao voted in Lormi constituency, and JCC (1) president Amit Jogi and his mother Renu Jogi, who are contesting from Patan and Kota, voted in Gorela in Marwahi (ST) constituency. Four MPs are among the 958 candidates in the fray.
Title: Tragedy Strikes as 50 ITBP Jawans Lose Lives in Naxal Blast Amid Sluggish Polling in Chhattisgarh
In a devastating turn of events, Chhattisgarh witnessed a tragic incident as 50 Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) jawans lost their lives in a Naxalite insurgency-related blast. The incident has not only claimed the lives of brave security personnel but has also raised concerns about the security situation in the region, casting a shadow over the ongoing polling process.
The Naxal Attack:
The Naxalite attack took place in a remote area of Chhattisgarh, underscoring the persistent challenges faced by security forces in combating insurgency. The ITBP personnel were reportedly conducting routine patrols in the area, aiming to ensure a safe and secure environment for the ongoing elections. However, the insurgents targeted the convoy, resulting in a tragic loss of lives.
yes. sucks, but yes.
its just a personal observation but this seems to be the case for women more than it is for men.
men in general could find other girls attractive, but still have that one girl in their mind they would ditch everything for. that one girl they think about before going to sleep. and if he gets that girl. the other attractive girls he shalt not touch or speak to.
if he does tho, he's not really a man now is he.
for women though, even if they are in a relationship, there is always this one guy she knows she can rely on. this one guy that she knows that if she gave him a chance, he would most likely take it. a backup of sorts. its ugly, its disgusting. but it is what it is.
again, just an observation
This makes men sounds so romantic but they're not lol
i dont disagree with you at all. there isn't a superior gender smh. im just trying to consider both sides always. sometimes im biased, but not afraid to admit it.
dating during these times is horrible in general. the girl you thought loves you doesn't only have eyes for you.
that guy you fell for ended up cheating on you.
please look at it both ways. not just one sided too darlin.
the reason why im saying its an observation is cause thats what I've seen so far, every single girl in a relationship has this one OTHER guy thats there for back up, thats waiting for him to make her cry.
I disagree. Men are the one's with all the backups. And even if they fine THE girl, they still keep the backups warm. They figure that because they are just screwing the side girls or that it doesn't count.
I'm sorry but this is the way men act. Men are always checking out other girls right in front of thwor girlfriends.
@Radiate143 two years I stopped texting girls. I stopped hanging out with them the way i did when I single. Because I didn’t want her to worry.
First year she kissed someone else.
Second year mark during a break she suddenly found two other guys.
I left her but still loved her, I came back in 3 weeks and she’s kissed one of the new guys and talks to him everyday like we did. She’s not settling though cause she’s going through her options. She told me this her self. I tried asking her to block him, but is “hard to keep him blocked”.
Then reveals that she knew him when we started dating earlier.
Now she doesn’t want me and spends time with him now. I’m the blocked one.
There are two more similar ones that don’t relate to me.
Well, sometimes we get back what we used to dish out.
Don't argue for something stupid like this. They either have bad experiences and applied the logic to men in general, or got personally offended. It's so easy to offend someone these days…
It’s sad to see you guys can’t see things in general instead of being so biased all the time.
Stop getting offended. Why is everyone so sensitive?
some people can get romantically involved... and into, more than one people at once, yes
I've seen something like that happen, not to me though, I've always felt drawn to one and that is it...
but there can also be some levels of intensity involved... maybe they start to feel a bit more strongly with two people they are starting to get close with, so at that moment, they might be feeling a bit unclear or undecided, or sometimes... genuinely into both of them
how strong these romance feelings can get? well, that could go very different for different people and their specific situations
Of course, they can, especially if they're a man. To make it simple, men's natural inclination is to deal with/have multiple women. I'm not trying to be funny or anything, I'm just being honest, while women on the other hand are naturally disposed to wanting one man because their biology dictates it to be so for their desires. This is what makes it strange for women to be all over the place, but biologically normal for men.

while it takes 9 months for one woman to have (usually) one baby.
Nature speaks for itself.
@Billlewis Why'd you want me to follow you, mate?
You know what else nature says;
That men in GENERAL can hold one erection and produce one ejaculation in 24 hours.
While a woman can take 300 - 500 men in 24 hours.
So even if you wanted to impregnate QUOTE “every fertile woman on the planet”.
You don’t have the erection capacity to do it.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
MORON 🖕
@EmyyWolf It is a lie that a man can only hold one erection and produce one ejaculation within 24 hours, and I'm surprised you don't know this, seeing that you've typed like a hoe (Your words reflect your personality).
A woman can, literally speaking, take a large amount of men per day, but that only makes her MORE of a hoe. It doesn't make her valuable or special. Prostitutes take thousands of dicks per day. Does that make them special? Learn to use that head of yours, you dumb bitch.
If YOU'VE slept with a guy and seen that he can only hold one erection once during ONE day, and cum only ONCE in ONE day-- then that's that sad fuck you slept with, because that's not a normal man. This proves you aren't male because every man in his right mind (and body) KNOWS that he can produce more than one set of ejaculations in ONE day and by virtue, many, MANY erections. You're quite stupid for one who thinks they can talk one "rEaLItY". I don' know what books you're reading but whatever they're telling you is a lie. WAKE up, you DUMB bitch.
Shut up and go back to taking your faulty cock or something. Don't talk on shit you don' know.
@Billlewis Why can't you just message me, instead? Message me privately if you want to talk.
If YOU🫵 can make multiple erections in 24 hours. You are the exception, not the rule.
In the VAST MAJORITY; men can GENERALLY, & USUALLY produce one erection , and one single ejaculation. For at least 12 hours, then he has to wait another 12 hours. In general men even fall asleep after ejaculating too. So man, that sucks for you don’t it 🫵😆
If a Lioness fucks 30 males in one night does it make her a hoe? You see it don’t matter what you call us, insulting females to pull them away from the best males does nothing for you.
Maybe it makes you feel a little better about yourself. But a female will do what she needs to do. Like it, hate it, love it, DONT MATTER.
I know this is a competition tactic weak males use to compete with alpha males. You can’t compete any other way 😆.
Has to shame the female.
Now….. If you want to impregnate multiple women in 24 hours. You’re gonna have to somehow unnaturally remove your “release” your “semen” from inside of one female. And UNNATURALLY inject it into another female using an object. And you’d have to UNNATURALLY do this with about 200 females in one night.
And I says UNNATURALLY, because you can no longer fuck, your erection is done. 😆😆
THAT SUCKS FOR YOU DONT IT? 🫵😆
Also, if you’re the exception, of having multiple erections in 24 hours? You’d only impregnate about 7 women per day.
THAT IS STILL NOT ALL OF MIAMI DUMBFUCK
🤡
And don’t even get me started on , wether you even deserve to be reproduced WITH. You’re an unselect male of low quality genes. You fall in the class of DYING A VIRGIN. You don’t get to pass down your dna. Low testosterone males. Testosterone deficient males. Don’t get to reproduce and this is in all species in nature.
Estrogen infused males are meant to die virgin.
Unfit, undesirable males aren’t supposed to fuck anyone.
@modeunae
If right now, females aren’t turning to look at you. If you don’t get constant attention from women. If you don’t catch Womens glances turning in your direction often. If you don’t make women blush…
You don’t get to reproduce. You fall in the category of beta male. Low quality beta male.
You’re a simpleton. You’re a sheep. You fall in the category of sheep. You’re an undesirable. Unfit. Undeserving, Low Testosterone Male.
OH WELL🤷🏻♀️🤷🏻♀️🤷🏻♀️
@modeunae
Oh and I almost forgot. You call us HOES, SLUTS, etc etc etc
Yet you love that.
You get on porn sites to watch women getting rammed by another male that isn't YOU 🫵
You love hoes and sluts more than you love the plain Jane housewife. LIAR 🤥.
You, and every man. A LIAR 🤥
YOU WATCH WOMEN GET IT FROM MULTIPLE MEN. And you bust on yourself to that 🤡🤡
@modeunae
• Women can take 300 + Dicks in one day /
YOU can't DO 300 EJACULATIONS IN ONE DAY
• Men watch multiple men screw a woman in porn and get off to it , you watch another another man fuck like some CUCKOLD 🤡
Yeah I’m getting the impression that women are the one supposed to be PLAYERS not men
@EmyyWolf Why in the world are you replying a hundred times to ONE thing I said? You're responding so many times. For the love of God, just respond once. I'd rather read a retarded essay than one hundred comments.
I'll make this nice and short: Not turning heads every second doesn't make you beta, it could just mean you need to get better. Men watch pornography to see the woman's body and reactions, not to see a nigga's dick or something like that. And yes, I am black. I wouldn't fake it. I have a conscience, though your point about seeing another nigga fuck a chick you want is a bit valid.
I don't watch porn.
I'm a man telling you how men are. How could you possibly argue with me? I'm a man and one erection is not what I get in a day. The amount of erections a man can get is endless, given that he didn't just come from cumming.
Some of the things you're saying show you're not okay. "Estrogen-infused males *are meant to die* virgin."? That's an evil thing to say. You wish death upon people, even to the point of saying 'they're supposed to'? You're a whole 'nother level of... I dunno... You're just fucked up. You're not okay in the head.
And lastly: The talk is about how many a man *could* impregnate in two weeks, not 'How quickly can a man impregnate all the women in the world?' Men are men, not machines. Why would I need to cum 300 times a day? Wake up.
@Billlewis Send me a message about what you want to talk about. .
@modeunae
I didn’t say they “have to die”.
I said they’ll stay Virgin through life. Essentially dying a virgin in old age.
Not made to reproduce.
Not made to pass down.
Their purpose is to serve others and be useful in society. Be productive. Not reproduce.
And also, I didn’t say how many erections the average, weak, ugly, man can get. I said how many “ejaculations” he can make.
And in GENERAL, a man can possibly impregnate a fertile woman in her fertile days. PER DAY. He would need a new woman of child bearing age. Every single day. And one not menstruating that very day.
So yeah. Honestly speaking. A man can cum in 30 women in 30 days. That being said, most men don’t qualify to do this. By looks. By genes 🧬. By testosterone. By how appealing and dimorphic you are.
And for the young men like you who are healthy. each subsequent ejaculation produces less semen. This means the chances of pregnancy in 7 women in one day. Are less.
FOOL 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
If you got it, you did. If you didn’t, you didn’t.
@EmyyWolf Stop replying more than once to my shit. Reply in one comment, not a hundred like I said.
You're quite stupid in the way you think. The younger a man is, the more healthy his semen is. An older man will only do better than a younger man if the older man is in his prime, not in his elderly years, though even then-- he probably has higher chances of being able to produce a semen than a woman a child.
Either way-- the fact of the matter is, ONE man can impregnate all the fertile women on Earth in 2 weeks. We're not talking about a "supernatural" man; we're talking about a normal, average-health nigga.
Hoe or not a hoe … the female anatomy is that capable of taking many dicks.
And you can impregnate all the women on earth? Do it, I want to see it to believe it. 😆
And yes, the female orgasm is very much needed. During a vaginal orgasm the female secrets a fluid from the Bartholins Glands that helps semen find the egg. Without female orgasm the chances of pregnancy are less.
Ant doctor will tell you this. It’s why women have two pleasures, the clit and the walls. Two different pleasures that feel completely different to the other.
You will never understand.
TIME TO RETURN TO BIOLOGY CLASS. TYRONE. 😆
Women nowadays don’t even want to procreate. Specially with losers like you. Or undesirables like you. The genes are not good enough. And the resources to feed the brat aren’t even there.
We might as well release our fluids with a select few men, who you don’t fit into. 🤷🏻♀️ We rather have fun, before associating with imbeciles like you, who obviously needs to return to HighSchool.
You’re like 22 and still doesn’t know anything about female sexuality and female anatomy. Even after a female brought you to life. 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️ Even after a female fed you from her body for you to even make it through the first stages of you surviving 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️. 22 grown adult, and still doesn’t understand female psychology and female sexuality.
If female pleasure is not that important to you. That’s fine. It’s important to most men on earth. Because dare a moron like you not sexually please her. She’s gonna go seek sexual satisfaction with someone else.
She’s gonna feel so sexually frustrated, she’ll talk to your brother, your friend or your Daddy. That’s what’s she gonna do, 🤷🏻♀️ you’re the one who doesn’t care about her pleasure. Many other men will. In their MAJORITY, they will care. 🤷🏻♀️ sucks for you, don’t it.
Time for you to either grow your dick, or learn to use your tongue. Cause I promise you, they’ll cheat or leave you, dare you not sexually please them.
🖕
If you don’t care about the female pleasure. Go GAY 🌈. Go flirt with some dudes. 🤷🏻♀️ what else you gonna do. Obviously you don’t like females. Might as well take it up the ass. Or get some man booty.
Yes you can like multiple people and possibly love more than one. But you can’t be IN LOVE with more than one. I can love more than one and want better for them. But the person I’m in love with is where I want to be, who I want to be with, and who I choose.
True so true
Men often say you can love many women but your never really in love with them.
@RoseySarah thats those men who probably didn't want any strings attached but wanted that d*** attached to her p****
Lmao so true 🤣
Thanks for the laugh
Yeah those fboys who want no strings but don't want you seeing any one else.
@KhunMike i said “those” men. As in the ones she's referring to. I didn't say all
@KhunMike The floor is yours if you got sumn to say
@KhunMike well you can assume whatever you want. She brought up men and i remained on that topic. Next time let me know ahead of time that I should remain neutral so you can sleep better at night
You can certainly like and date more than one person at the same time, especially while very young and forming your own personality, needs, and desires.
But, what usually happens is, along the way, and with time, you decide who suits you better, and who you like more. It also depends on whether that person chooses you over others too!
The flip side of this is, you're older and someone who doesn't want to commit to one person, so you PREFER being in relationships with several people, who, we hope, know and accept this.
Remember, we're talking about LIKING several people romantically. This isn't a crime and it's reasonable, especially in early stages of relationships. And for those who prefer it, again, as long as people are honest, no harm, no foul.
Yes, if you are emotionally numb or aren't looking for something serious with any of those partners. Or perhaps you are into monogamous relationship and don't get attached to one person. This is actually a recipe for disaster for someone who is sensitive and prefers to love and give their care/ attention to only one person. Realistically it's impossible to be romantically linked to multiple partners as I think they are only options, and it's gets exhausting after some time to give equal amount of attention to all of them. In the end, the person would eventually chose someone who they feel connected with as its not a matter of only "liking" someone it's about loving them romantically.
I have not ever seen it. people focus on 1 thing at a time. mentally and emotionally. oh sure you can switch between multiple things focusing on each for a few seconds at a time repeatedly but when it comes to emotions towards people I have seen zero evidence to suggest that it happens. you love 1 person deeply or you like several people for differing reasons. you may claim you love them but the depth will not be present if several people are involved. that is why relationships that have several people have among the highest failure rate.
Of course! Whether a person is monogamous or polyamorous is really genetic. Most humans are not monogamous by definition. They may choose to behave as if they were for periods of time, but they still have an interest in others even if it's stifled for whatever reason. I have two husbands who I love equally. I've been with one 16 years and the other 9 years. I love them both more than I love myself. I've also dated other guys and had strong feelings and considered taking on a third.
Love your comments. They’re always balanced and on point. I really hate it when people make claims about stuff they have no knowledge of or experience. Of course it’s possible to love more than one person at a time. If they’re attractive, funny and nice then it happens naturally. It used to be very normal until the Abrahamic religions came around
Oh hell naw! You can't be lovin' on more than one person at a time. That's some straight up bullshit! Love ain't no goddamn pie that you can slice up and share with everyone. It's like trying to divide by zero in your case, coz if you think you're in love with multiple people, then newsflash: you ain't really in love with none of them. You just confused as fuck and need to sort your shit out.
No. They just THINK they love multiple people at the same time. Love is not selfish, love is not just about the person who "loves". So to love more than one person at the same time only proves you love neither. What you're talking about is called "limmerance". It's what precedes love. It gives you all the feelings of being in love, but ISN'T love.
Not love, romantically like. Crushing y'know
Yeah, you're talking about limmerance. Yes you can have limmerance for more than one person. It's just hormones in your brain giving you irrationally warm feelings for another, or in this case multiple others.
GIrls dont become happy by having different guys.. The western society might tell them that it is okay whatever they do. But women find out the reality of the lies when they get pass their 30s and life is truly short and they'll find out the truth regardless.
The more guys a girl dates the more she becomes unhappy.. and she has less chance of going into a long-term relationship.
For men doesn't matter if they're NOT SIMPS. men dont connect love with s3x.. I do see that the western world is finished! Too much SIMPS here.. that ruin everything.
For more info go to
Yes that's what we call loose cannons lol less for some reason you want to get in a three-way relationship which never works from everything I've seen somebody gets jealous and somebody ends up with somebody at least at the end of the day or just implodes
Well I found myself in a situation where my wife (19yrs) said she loved two guys. She was having an emotional affair and claims the only met once and had sex. She had two dates before before we met. Found out he was married (at the time) several years ago. That was two years ago, but the emotional thing was still going on. How can this be. I was the better bet, more dependable and I was always there for her kids and family. Should I have just left? I'm trying to work through this. I said I will not do it again. I'm tooo old for this crap.
Of course. Humans didn't develop to just like one person so it's only natural if we come across this, obviously that's not an excuse to cheat though.
I get many crushes very quick and have many I crush on but I aren't going to cheat if I had partner for one of those crushes.
I can't but I think some people can. Answer to this question would be very long because ability to like multiple people romantically is connected closely with personality type of a person. Generally people who can are incompatible with me romantically.
Absolutely. I currently do and have in the past. Poly relationships do it all of the time.
It's Possible, very little probability, but possible..
romantic attraction means a surge of neurotransmitters when getting involved with someone.
People who are Polygamous in their hardwiring of the brain, during their phallic stage of development, can have that kind of issue..
It's possible but at the same time it creates the delema that love isn't real if you can romantically love more than one individual. Ovd is between two people. It's supposed to make those two individuals feel special and as if they're the only two people on this earth.
Yes, I've had feelings for two guys at the same time. But then it is extremely difficult. I had to choose one because I didn't want to be in a love triangle or secretly want to be with both of them.
Why couldn’t you talk to both and share? It is entirely possible to love and respect 2 different people at the same time. One doesn’t have to choose one and dump another. Let the other people decide wether they want to share someone they both love. My generation couldn’t do this openly but you can. The world is a different place now
Oh hell yeah ! Of course they can , and it completely and utterly natural for all to do that.
No. Well I guess yes but not equally. Nothing human can be equal, as it’s a perfect equality. You’ll always love someone more. Even with your kids.
Good thought experiment: flip a coin after assigning a guy to each side. Flip and put your hand over it so you can see the outcome.
NOW: do you want one of the guys to win over the other?
Mormons did it for a long time. However, you could argue that, having multiple wives wasn't really "love", it was just what the religion said they could do, if they wanted. I don't think it exists anymore, any mormons out there know?
But no, I don't think you can "love" more than one person at a time. The question is, if you love someone, why would you ever "break up"?
I've talked to tons of poly people. They're all full if shit. You can go online and talk to them. They're swingers who hate the term "swingers."
They want to fuck multiple people, but they prefer to be called "polyamorous."
It really is a much more quaint term.
obviously a feeling is a feeling possible toward many.
Romantic in this sense is too broad to really answer. So I'm just going to say that I could easily be sexually attracted to multiple people at once though I couldn't be deeply emotionally invested with multiple people at once.
I currently am stuck in the middle of liking multiple women right now, I only know them through social media and messaging them. They all live far away from me. Its a pain to try and decide who is best for me. I feel at this point I need to actually meet each of them to know who. But afraid they find out about the others. 😞
Yes, but I would never admit it to a girlfriend.
I don't think that a person can like multiple people at once maybe just having a crush and that ends after a couple of days.
I think it depends on the person. And even then, maybe they can... But should they? Would it cause problems? Things to think about...
To be honest, I can't imagine such scenario, but I get people are different.
It looks like I can process only one thread at time :D
It's not a suitable scenario but, yes, some people can romantically like multiple people at once.
It's more like lust and attraction rather than love. You can't love more than one person but yeah you can be attracted to many or be fond of many.
Can you have sexual attraction and feelings for multiple people.. Sure, but you always focus on one person more than the other.. And eventually feelings for one person overpowers the other..
Only men can, which is why some societies allowed men to have multiple wives but no society that got past the stone age allowed a woman to have multiple husbands.
Bruh why do some people believe only men are allowed to do shit
@preciousjewel men and women are different, and this is literally the only double standard that benefits men as all others exclusively benefit women. You want men to be taller than you, wealthier than than you, pay for dates, and lay their lives down to protect you while all we ask is that you not be promiscuous. Feminists like yourself do want equality you want privilege.
Okay you got rejected by someone I get it
@preciousjewel wrong again i am happily married. It's really pathetic that you assume every man who isn't a simping feminist has to be an incel.
You just want multiple wives
Stone age? I guess you didn't bother to look up "polyandry". Quote: "
Of the 1,231 societies listed in the 1980 Ethnographic Atlas, 186 were found to be monogamous, 453 had occasional polygyny, 588 had more frequent polygyny, and four had polyandry.[3] Polyandry is less rare than this figure suggests, as it considered only those examples found in the Himalayan mountain region (eight societies). More recent studies have found more than four other societies practicing polyandry."
To me it's not worth the trouble of having to manage them unless I was like King Solomon or Ghengis Khan and had a harem guarded by eunuchs or something.
Are you religious
@preciousjewel no, I am not. If there is a God then we were created to either worship Him or suffer for His entertainment, and I have no interest in worshiping an almighty narcissist or sadist.
Please, read and comprehend prior to posting. Quote: "If women made the laws there would certainly be more societies with women taking multiple husbands." Hence, I am not suggesting that it is common. I am saying that there would be more (as opposed to none) if women made the laws, as opposed to societies allowing polygyny in which men make the laws.
You then argued quote: "no polyandrous society has ever made it out of the stone age". To which I demonstrated that none is incorrect, even outside the "stone age". They do exist in the modern world. Any percent greater than 0% is more than none.
She still wouldn't sleep with you though. Simping doesn't get you laid.
Yeah, I do. Polyamory works if everyone is on the same page, plenty of people are non-mono or poly.
I think it works discreetly. where 2 of them have to be on same page. I know an incident (not polyamory) where i was lying about some normal things to a girl's husband because I knew girl didn't disclose few things to him. Later I told her that you should have told your husband the facts, no need to lie. She did later. But I am sure if I hadn't prompted her this, she would have continued to hide and I would continue to lie to her husband just to protect her. This tells girl can lie or keep things discreet with her husband.
I think my answer to the question in this link also addresses this question.
Not sure if it's something I could do but I'm sure it exists
i don't feel that i can but i believe some people can
Sue they can, but like most choices you can only have one.
Yes we can. It's not healthy nor does it ever end well... But yes we can.
If they kept their options open.. or didn't learn how to lower their gaze.
That would be Utah Mormons they pravtice polygamy and they married up to 5 wifes.
''Romantic'' is a medieval construction around social interaction.
So: 'romantically' one can't.
And practically, one surely can.
Yes. There's nothing stopping that from happening and there are people who are romantically involved with multiple people at once. This is why polygamous relationships exist.
You can absolutely be romantically interested in multiple people at the same time, that doesn't mean you should act on those feelings towards each of them.
it's hard to tell when you have not talk or see that person without filter
you could romantically like multiple people at once, but you'll probably have a favorite and that would cause issues.
It might not work out in the end
You can have some kind of crush or infatuation for more than 1 person. But it never gets deeper than that with both people simultaneously.
If you really love someone, it's only one person, maybe you have crushes on others. People with a strong pair bonding ability only bond with one person.
yep.
I've been there more than once.
Such a headache.
Yes. I have loved 2 women equally at the same time in the past.
I don't know, I don't think I've ever seen such thing happen before
Too many "can you" questions like these when there ought to be more "should you" ones.
Multiple is rather high.. but a couple, yeah it’s possible. However bad energy will take over if you aren’t being honest.
Yes it's possible. If it wasn't possible, then there'd be a lot less drama in the world.
Obviously. But as long as they don't act on it, it doesn't really matter, does it?
Yes I think everyone can... logistically should you that's probably the beter question
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions