If you're wanting her to have biological children, the risk for birth defects goes up significantly with mother's over 30. Depending on your risk tolerance/adversity, I would say somewhere around 35, and subtract a year for each child you'd like to have. Unless you have some other plan, like you want children who are 2+ years apart in age. There's obviously several factors at play here, so if you fell in love with a 40 year old woman for example, you'd have to decide what matters most to you.
If you don't care about increased possibility of birth defects, or you are planning to adopt, then I would say pretty much any age woman you are a good fit with, perhaps with a cut off around 60 if you want her to have a higher likelihood of being alive until the kids are 18+ and independent.
Most Helpful Opinions
20 around
28ish would be sort of middle ground of conception decline but still within reason. ? But the issue is that you need time to really get to know each other, to make sure your relationship is solid, before bringing a child into it. They used to say that at 35 chance of carrying a pregnancy to full-term precipitously drops off. I did some research on this and it's not that straightforward, I guess, but even still, she should probably be in her twenties, still.
Nah don't go ny age
A true woman would love u no matter her age and give u a child
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
5Opinion
- u
How many children does he want, and how far apart does he want to have them?
Eh that's not fair to the kids. If you knocked someone up today you would be 65 with a kid in high-school.
Maybe the question should be what's the youngest woman who will date him.
I would say early 30s at most.
My mom was almost 45 when I was born.
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions