What do men consider as a dominant female, and why do men prefer not to deal with dominant females?

[Anonymous]

[Rosexøxø]

I suppose they perceive them as the dominant males who are really just insecure and project or try to over compensate. Men usually like other fellas with some chill. They find the hierarchy with friendship and some rough stuff but nothing dramatic or over the top. So… they wouldn’t want to be around an alpha female cause it could be perceived by them as her being insecure and partly could be true of some type of overcompensation.

Essentially she couldn’t be any fun cause a lady with something to prove is… like a lady looking for validation but in another way that isn’t flattering or attractive (not always- there’s could be some exceptions).

I think guys understand women a bit weaker so they have to work harder for things and this could be a chip on the shoulder. Another thing is they don’t want to see a wannabe man in any form- this means not some lady doing legs open, swag walk, chewing wheat, and all of that or talking deeper. Guys are deterred at times (used to- times have changed) by Tom boys or at least ones who aren’t like nature or natural but trying to be like a guy…

Sure maybe that’s a bit harsh and women should be able to do just about anything or not cry if they don’t wanna- I suppose some men will just not be used to it, don’t buy it, think that’s a period lady that is wearing a suit- she’ll have bad moments too and since she’s not a guy at heart and she’s not wearing a dress that’s going to be super confusing and difficult to avoid confrontation.

I make no excuse for a guy, I’m just trying to explain why I think they’d do such a thing.

You have to be a bit prepared- I feel like- to engage with a woman like that, and perhaps for guys, they wouldn’t want to let her walk over him, yet they can’t establish themselves and potentially hurt her fragile feelings?

I say an alpha female could be a bit confusing as the lgbtq community but just a bit dialed down to just social expression and/or interaction. Just cause they’re independent doesn’t mean you want to let them get away with being a bitch, and do you congratulate them? What about their feelings? What would be disrespectful to them?

They don’t explain their emotions like the lgbtq does on what’s offensive and what isn’t.

Do men just treat her like one of the guys? Do they let her carry stuff? Not all guys are super communicative so do they check in with her every few moments?

I don't know it seems tiring to me. If she’s independent then that’s easier and if she communicates herself, but if there’s any drama or overplaying stuff then I think some people will be deterred.

Are they LEADERSHIP material or are they just being a bossy bratty jerk of a person?

That can be for guys and girls, but guys handle male jerks differently than they would a female jerk walking with a male suit on and pixie cut and a word at every turn. 🤷‍♀️ Just seems like they’d need a therapist to be comfortable in their own shoes. And who’s gonna like baby sit that? That’s a walking bomb, I feel. But I don't know excuse me if I was rude.

[IslaTheWitch]

Isn't "dominant" definition the same for both genders? Most dominant men define themselves as leaders, protectors and providers.

So let's say dominant woman is the same. Why some men don't want to deal with her? Because she won't let them have the last word :D

[Finchie40]

A female that more than likely has serious issues , that has A lot of hate an anger towards men , that shows more of a masculine side than a feminine side , she tries to take lead in a relationship , and wants her partner to be weak to her , basically her way or no way. she wants to be in control of everything. Some guys’ like that shit but not many. Most of us Men were raised to be leaders we were raised to take care of a girl to protect her and love her and cherish her , we want a girl that looks up to us not down at us , A dominate girl doesn’t look up to us , she mainly treats him like shit. And most dominate girls ‘ aren’t loyal and faithful because they think they do no wrong , if she doesn’t get her way she latches on to someone else. A submissive girl cherishes her man , she looks up to her man and feels safe and protected by him , she compliments him and makes him feel valued and appreciated , she stays loyal and faithful to him , if he treats her with love trust and respect , she has no issues getting on her knees to him and pleasing him , she loves the masculine dominance that she doesn’t have within herself. She is drawn to his masculine energy and treats him like a King compared to a dominate girl that treats her man like a joker , I love submissive girls ‘ and that’s the only girls ‘ I go for when it comes to relationships. If a girl tries to be dominate over me and treats me like shit , I kick her ass to the curb where she belongs

[Asker]

What about the girls who are submissive but labeled as dominant simply because of their career and their ability to provide for themselves with no financial constraints.

[Finchie40]

As long. If she is loyal and faithful to her man and not a cheater , other people
Can label her all they want , but all that matters is she is submissive to her partner.

[IslaTheWitch]

It's great most men are more reasonable :D

[JacobJordan]

Dealing with "dominant" women is exhausting because she always makes things a damn argument and doesn't know when to shut the hell up. She also typically will sooner give up on a relationship than work through any potential problems that arise. Any time my wife and I encounter a problem she automatically looks me to lead and solve it. That doesn't mean her input isn't welcome. I ask her input regularly but we both know that at the end it will be my responsibility for the final decision. My wife knows that when I need her input I will ask. Until then she knows that she is perfectly safe and fine. This balance means that if their is a problem she can bring it to me and knows I will solve it. If we encounter a problem outside the home she doesn't have to provide input which could make things worse and trusts that I will handle it. These are things "dominant" women don't do. They almost always make shit worse. Easiest example "my boyfriend can beat up your boyfriend"... like no don't drag a man into your stupid bullshit

[Asker]

I see you point however I don't think my boyfriend can beat up your boyfriend is a good example of a dominant women... but I am curious though what's wrong with the woman wanting to provide a solution as well. I guess what I'm asking why do men find women who can contribute to the relationship in ways other than watching children, cooking and sex off putting. My question to you is must you have the final decision or the final say to be the "Man" in the relationship.

[Rosexøxø]

Yeah I agree with some drama but I also agree with asker and disagree with your claim about dominant being let’s fight and make bets on fights lol I don't know if every dominant lady would be as you said displaying impulsive or risky behavior, but I can’t recall any of that type in my personal life or in action, so I wouldn’t know. I’ve encountered some bratties from both sexes irl.

I think it works in your case cause she trusts your judgement. Not every male can lead just cause he owns a pair of balls. I’m sure we all love em, but that’s not the reason a male can make wise decisions. I’m glad it runs well with you two and I think that can aid in longevity memories romance and a bunch more

But not all men single or taken can lead like that and I think all opinions can be heard. It’s not like one set of opinions are superior. That’s just my take on it. Feel free to disagree to eternity cause I can’t change my mind on this particular area of this subject matter lol. I’m happy for you two though, and the opinion was valued.

[JacobJordan]

Most men do not have an issue with their wife or girlfriend providing a solution the problem comes when and if that solution is wrong which typically leads to an argument. In any relationship if you put 2 leaders together you get conflict because both have a different solution and both think theirs is the best. A head of household is the leader and more often than not men tend to be the leaders. That doesn't mean they are good at it. No having the final say isn't a requirement to be the "man". Having the final say is just a matter of trust some couples have it. Some find it easier to split it. Some it is the opposite where the woman has the final say. In all of these though you have masculine energy and feminine energy. Dominant women tend to have more masculine energy hence why guys don't really want to be with them. A relationship is supposed to be complimentary. So if the woman has more masculine energy she would need a feminine man.

[padrepiedra777]

Women who want to run the household (in a marriage), are dominant. There are many ways in which this can manifest, and I'm not talking about women who have opinions/personality/etc. I'm talking about a woman who wants to make the final decision on everything.

These women don't trust their husband. This is simply a bad sign for the relationship and either leads to divorces or relationships in which the man checks out entirely. Men need to feel needed and looked up to. This doesn't mean that a man doesn't want a woman he respects, he does, but he also needs a woman who respects and looks up to him.

Does this answer the question or should I go more indepth?

[Asker]

Thank you for ur input. You have answered my question. Ok so a woman takes up the dominant role because she does not trust her partner. So could it be that it's not that she lacks the means to be submissive but her current partner isn't one she finds worth submitting to. I find myself asking what would make me want to submit myself to a partner completely. Of course trust but I feel as though it's more of a matter of can I trust you enough to protect me to keep me safe. Whether that mean protect my heart, make sure I always have a roof over my head, or financially. I guess besides men need to feel needed and looked up to I want to know what you believe a man role is in a relationship. What would a man role be for a woman who has everything

[padrepiedra777]

Yes. It could definitely be that the man isn't functioning in his role and she feels the need to take on his role for him.
What would a man's role be for a woman who has everything? He wouldn't have a role, because she doesn't need to be provided with anything, but I don't think that this really exists. No one exists entirely alone with everything -- and if they do, then they simply don't need a mate.
I think you're on the right track from what I read from your comment. You need to find a man that you can trust--but I will also say that no man is perfect. Every man is human, and when he fails to be perfect he will need you to support him and show that you still trust him and believe in him even when he fails.

[padrepiedra777]

A man's role in the relationship is to listen and to lead. He needs to be able to understand his wife, but also to make the final decision and take responsibility for it. Like you said, he also needs to be the protector of her heart and safety. He needs to guide, but also to be humble and able to take criticism himself -- and sometimes to be led. Its a complex thing and can't be summed up in a text response, but I think from what you've said you already understand deep down.

[tomboy2003]

Because they are insecure. They want someone obedient and submissive (as it comes to both personality and during sex) in order to feel superior themselves. They don’t want to be reminded of their own weaknesses, so they look for someone weak to feel like they are above them.

[JacobJordan]

Lol what delusion is this. My wife is both obedient and submissive. She is also my equal. She is not less than me and never will be. As a man it is my responsibility to protect her from the bullshit of the world as best I can. As a man it is my job to be the rock that keeps us tethered as we navigate whatever life throws at us. Her responsibility it is to encourage and support me. To ensure she protects my emotions and provides a stable emotional approach. In addition a woman's greatest strength is her compassion for others. She approaches situations differently and if I am making a decision I shouldn't she keeps that in check by ensuring I don't entirely rationalize everything. Obedience just means I don't have to ask numerous times or deal with an argument. Submissive means she doesn't try and steer the relationship and instead trusts that I will do what is best for us and our children. 20 years and we are just as happy now as our first year

[bobby_bush_eater]

It's literally your generic disposition to behave in a caring, submissive manner to a man you look to for love and protection to raise children with.

There's only thousands of years of history and scientific evidence supporting this but after only 60 years feminism this ideology you subscribe to seems to somehow be dominant in privileged young Western women...

[Asker]

I understand your point completely

[Asker]

@bobby_bush_eater yes historically speaking women have been known to behave in a submissive manner which quite frankly why wouldn't they. Everything was provided for them, they didn't necessarily have to go out and work neither. And historically we can say men were hunters making sure their families were fed. But times have changed you can simply go to the supermarket now and women are not necessarily having their whole lives provided for like customary in the past. It's because women aren't privileged in western areas that they have to take up this dominant role, to protect themselves until the right man if he ever does come along.

[Asker]

@JacobJordon you say your wife is obedient. In you explained obedience is a situation where you don't have to ask numerous times. If your making decisions that affect both you and your not asking for her input on each and every decision how can you ever be seen as equals. It's clear you have the upper hand in the relationship and theirs nothing wrong with that what works for you works for you. Just because you have respect and love for your partner that should not be confused with seeing them as you equal.

[Rosexøxø]

@JacobJordan I wouldn’t say obedient… that’s like god and the sinners or something or parent and child. Owner and slave. I’d suggest agreeable but I suppose a word like that would tick someone like myself off. Personally I’m not only compassionate but one who seeks justice peace and defense. If a military can work with many males all wishing to protect IDEALLY I don’t see why relationships between two can’t work with them both wanting to protect each other. Oh well I guess. So far my relationship is working and I feel and perceive the respect goes both ways even if he doesn’t he gives no hint of disrespect and I feel safe and heard and I’m conscientious of hearing him as well. There’s no way I could take advantage either unless through some type of manipulation but he’s capable of expressing himself also. You seem to be doing fine, so I suppose it varies for everyone. There’s definitely other possibilities and options. Not a one size shoe fits all sorta thing.

[bobby_bush_eater]

This notion that it was only for a hunter gatherer society is not true. Was WW2 not a example where women stayed at home and helped out while the men fought? When they came home they (as is often the case after a long period of trauma) reproduced, bought single family housing and raised children in a traditional nuclear family.

A man can't really partner with a masculine women. Part of being masculine is to naturally push back, be argumentive, physical etc. This is literally genetic, it is not because of the societal norms.

When I say feminine means caring, submissive, nurturing etc. I do not know why it is always interpreted like you are being subjugated to a man's will. That's not what I mean, those traits are generally compatible to what a average male has. This is in the majority of our genetic disposition and there is extensive scientific proof of this. The dominant role male role is not hunter gatherer based, it's about offspring and partnering to take care of each other and your offspring, hence you need compatibility (not masculine+ masculine)

I will agree that in many societies women are subjugated and treated horribly and minimized to a great degree. Historically those societies do not perform well and most do not exist (some still do).

[JacobJordan]

Of course we are equals. I lead in certain aspects she leads in others. You are conflating obedience with subservience. If a situation that threatens the lives of our family occurs and I tell her to take to the children and hide she is not going to argue that she is going to obey that command. By that same token if she finds herself in a situation where she needs assistance she can convey with simply my name and the tone will convey the urgency. I don't sit there and go "what?" Depending on the urgency I will be by her side in moments. Obedience has little to do with hierarchy and more to do with knowing when is the appropriate time for a discussion and when it isn't. I have only had to use such an event twice when her life and my life and our children were in legitimate danger. I told her to take our kids and lock the bedroom door while I dealt with it. She didn't ask questions she didn't say a word she took the kids and locked the bedroom door. At that point only way the threat was getting to her was by killing me. That doesn't make her less equal. She understood the importance of situation and knew that anything that needed saying could wait until later.

[JacobJordan]

@bobby_bush_eater so very true. If you took a country of men and women and gave them both 100% equality across the board men gravitate towards physical jobs, stressful jobs etc women gravitate towards less stressful less physical more social jobs if not just being a stay at home wife/mom

[JacobJordan]

No outside influence was needed for that because men and women do it naturally

[tomboy2003]

The belief that women are inherently predisposed to behave in a caring and submissive manner to men is a cultural and historical construct rather than an inherent truth.

There isn't conclusive scientific evidence to support the belief that women are inherently predisposed to behave in a caring and submissive manner to men. Human behavior is influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors, and it's not accurate to attribute specific behaviors solely to gender.

[JacobJordan]

Actually their is. If left to their own devices men and women gravitate to what has been now dubbed "historical construct"

[tomboy2003]

“And historically we can say men were hunters making sure their families were fed” Thats not accurate. Anthropological evidence suggests that women in some prehistoric societies were hunters alongside men. While traditional gender roles often assigned men to hunting and women to gathering and caregiving, archaeological and anthropological research has revealed that women participated in hunting activities in various cultures throughout history. Women were doing many things.

[bobby_bush_eater]

@tomboy2003 that's not what I was saying. I literally said after that it's not hunter gatherer based and were there some women contributing obviously, these are all generalizations. In civilizations such as the hunter gatherer/prehistoric it was brutal and contributing was needed for bare minimum of survival. I can also point out that basically every successful large civilization was led by majority if not all men. Do you think that has nothing to do with genetics? You didn't see women piling into the ranks of the Napoleonic Era did you? Ironically it seems you are diminishing the value in being feminine and "traditional". I think it's an amazing thing they play a huge role in society and the education of our future children (not the government). I'm not wanting rights taken away or things to be forced back to how they were if that's how you're interpreting me.

However let's circle back to "cultural and historical construct rather than an inherent truth." So after ~150 years of feminism (in reality only about 40 in our current modern view) you have boiled down all the culture of nearly every civilizations gender norms to it's not scientific but it's a construct? With this logic you can point to the definition or inherent truth of anything as a construct. With this ideology there is no inherent truth because how we interpret it is a construct, it's a cyclical argument that allows you to just change anything you disagree with. You do realize outside of western civilization the far majority of the world still lives like they did previously? Essentially all of Islam does, India does, most of Africa does, parts of Latin and or south America do and the majority of Asia does. Are they all just stuck in cultural constructs? Why do the women continue to allow this then if they're essentially in captivity in your view?

My view is not the subjugation of women but your view is so modern you boil down everything to the western view of the past 40 years

[tomboy2003]

@bobby_bush_eater I did not answer to you, I answered to the woman who asked the question

[tomboy2003]

@bobby_bush_eater My view is not too modern, you are just too uneducated

[bobby_bush_eater]

@tomboy2003 I've actually completed 2 degrees, served in a war, and currently work for a large financial institution. Currently I am enrolled in another master's degree as well. All of my education in a very traditionally liberal state with probably the best education ratings in the country. Being that you're 20 years old I'm almost guaranteed more educated than you are. I also actively study history and anthropology.

You did not address my points you simply used an ad hominem instead. There is no deductive logic in the argument you made. I am not mocking you but you seem to take a contrary opinion as an attack on yourself. All the points I made are generalizations and there are always exceptions to the rules.

[Billlewis]

I honestly don't see any point in even having a relationship with a woman unless I can spend the majority of my time, efforts and resources on what I view as the most important component of any
M/F arrangement -- her enjoy, envy, period.

[HawkPerception]

Men are generally attracted to women that are shorter, smaller, weaker, younger, and even slightly less intelligent than themselves, just as women are generally attracted to men that are taller, bigger, stronger, older, and more intelligent than themselves (although they don't want to admit it about intelligence).

This is because there is a dominant and submissive dynamic in a relationship. Men want to protect and provide. It gives us satisfaction and fulfillment. It feels strange to be provided for by a woman. Men also want to dominate in bed. That means the smaller you are, the more he can envision himself tossing you around and manipulating your body in the bedroom.

Dominant females are usually not up in their feminine energy and have issues with the males in their lives. Only beta men and cucks tend to like being with dominant women.

[Anonymous]

Women who crave to be dominant have severe issues internally, they are fighting something inside and it's not my job to help them, me? Give advice to a woman or girl on her behaviour LOL yea right, I don't need that headache or drama, let women and girls learn through their poor choices, bad attitude and their failed ideologies they support and stand by today, 10-20 years from now it will be a different story. I find super dominant women and super dominant girls to be such a turn off, it's usually a deal breaker for me not to be with her. And no, I don't want to be the dominant one in a relationship, I just want peace of mind and communication but some girls and some women can't comprehend such an easy life view.

[bobby_bush_eater]

Behaving in a masculine manner.

It's unattractive because it's unnatural to attracted to masculine females. We're bred to reproduce and protect our offspring, why would we want to reproduce with another masculine being? I know focusing on genetics sounds weird but this is literally why the immediate action of a man thinking this way without being able to quantify why they feel that way is.

[Asker]

It's not weird at all lol. Attraction plays a big part in any relationship. But what's considered behaving in a masculine manner. A lot of times a female can be the most feminine of all but because she has a career and is career driven and ambitious she's labeled as dominant

[Rosexøxø]

Agreed guys don’t want to feel in any way what they like is another male unless they’re homosexual, so for a lady to try and embody masculine energy a bit can be a bit confusing for some guys. If we’re not taking about reproduction though, I don’t see why a man cans converse with such a lady and then possibly just see her as one of the guys? Or another human? Just cause she is doing that thing doesn’t mean you have to marry her or shun her. If guys can talk to dumb guys I don’t see why they can’t talk to a lady who some of them may say is “confused” or a bit problematic. Maybe men just don’t like the confusion I suppose. We are kinda already in an era where it swings both ways. I’m not for dramatic dom women either but I don’t see why there can’t be an ounce of fairness in the socialization/ interaction aspects.

[bobby_bush_eater]

@Rosexøxø I would obviously still socialize with them. I'm not just going to turn my back and shun them like an a**hole. However when it comes to dating I want a women who seems nurturing, loving, and motherly. A feminine role model for a girl and the aspiration for what a women should be for my son (don't make that statement weird you know what I mean).

I am fully intending to take care of 100% of the financial burden. I want my future wife to not have to work and to get to actually raise our children through homeschooling so not as to abdicate raising the child to the government. For all this I need a feminine women, not a weak women, not a women who just is obedient to her man at all times. That isn't what being feminine is

[Rosexøxø]

Yeah I see your train of thought. I say let the women who like to cook cook.

Let her cook. lol

And let the ones who want to contribute in other ways do that.

It’s nice you wouldn’t just ignore someone like that if they’re not necessarily a pain and they maybe have to interact with you say in a business setting or everyday life type of thing. Then they’d be confused also by the reaction given.

Your preferences are fine and totally your own. Hope you find the ideal woman. I know there’s definite chance for that. And no weirdness received. Literally! I didn’t get any part where something could’ve been offensive or awkward I just saw you mentioned weird but I also saw you sharing your thoughts so that was totally okay. Thanks 😁👍

[bobby_bush_eater]

@Rosexøxø I appreciate that lol I have more of a modern traditional yet still Catholic view. I don't want subjugation of women or restriction of their rights but I think the fact that all women in society are forced to compete with men and that having a husband and raising kids is like the "side quest" to your job. School teachers and athletic coaches essentially raise your kids nowadays.

I think a lot of women are slowly realizing they want a more traditional life than what they've been conditioned to because they are more feminine. That doesn't mean reverting to 1720 tho. However, I completely acknowledge some women don't want that and never will but I think currently society forces it upon us.

[Mindfuldude]

My 2 cents: People like what they like, that could be dominant or the alternative. Usually it has something to do with upbringing as most preferences seem to come from familiarity & it could also be an attempt to adhere to society standards. I feel people’s preferences are a pretty direct reflection on themselves & whether they’ve done the work or not mentally. That’s not to say any kind of taste is “bad” or “wrong.” It’s just information. The most important thing, in my opinion, is that people hopefully don’t try to change their authentic selves to accomodate the taste of another person, just because they’re into the person. Your person will like you just as you are & I recommend doing the same. Expecting any kind of changes isn’t fair & creates resentment, try to be authentic & look for authenticity.

[Billlewis]

To me, a dominant female is a woman who never lets me have any penetrative sex with her, while she dates other guys with whom she does have intercourse with, and lets me pay for her dates with them.

[Asker]

Huh I'm confused so because she chooses to do what she want with her body she's dominant. Just because you pay for her dates why must she have sex with YOU

[Billlewis]

I don't want or expect her to have sex with me.

[Asker]

Ok so what you mean by dominant female cuz your statement is in relation to whether or not she withhold sex at least that's what I took from it what do you mean exactly

[sheikalana]

It makes them feel emasculated. To me a dominant woman is someone who wants to have things done her way all the time, thinks she's always right, too independent, wants to be in charge and the man to be her 'puppy.'

[The_Sexpert]

That's just biology

Most men are wired to be more dominant and not submissive to anyone

So unless the man is amongst the minority of submissive guys he won't like to around a dominant female

[Asker]

So are u saying the men that have issues with dominant females are not dominant themselves

[The_Sexpert]

Well maybe the opposite
Those who are submissive probably love it
Opposites attract

[itsclearlynicholas]

Dominant female are useful in jobs or roles where they are needed. However, do I a single man want that woman off the clock or as my partner? Uhhh... trails off sentence...

[theycallme_jd]

Nope, you provide no room for opinion here. Who said men prefer not to deal with dominant females? Personally I wouldn't but I would wish for a woman who is neither dominant nor submissive. We both should be qualified to have an equal say in matters.

[PatientZeR0]

I love powerful women. I would guess that men fear losing power.

[Asker]

Interesting but why is it that some men feel the need to have power over a female.

[PatientZeR0]

That comes from like the first forever of time that's why women couldn't own property or drive or vote so it's normalized to feel like women should need the man and her stock value is low because we devalued what we feminize like child rearing and teacher. It's in our DNA as a culture

[Anonymous]

What makes you assume they don't want dominant females? Men have all different tastes.

[Asker]

And that's completely fine just was curious as to why a man would prefer not to deal with a dominant female. I mean there must be a reason.

[Opinion Owner]

Some men like to come home and relax. Dominant woman would be more active and wanting.

[Opinion Owner]

I don't mean sex I just mean personality.

[Asker]

Ahhh ok I see so a woman less active and less wanting is what you prefer

[Opinion Owner]

i think you fell off track in your own q.

[Asker]

Not really just want to make sure I clearly understand ur view point. I'm just trying to see everyone thoughts on the matter that's all lol

[jahaims]

A female that tries to act masculine to compensate for what they lack.

[Asker]

Elaborate on trying to ask masculine pls

[jahaims]

Dominant-most important, powerful, or influential.
Historically, males have more influence and power than females. So, it is associated with masculinity.

[FuqUFggt]

Men don't prefer not to deal with dominant females they prefer not to marry them. Who the fuck wants to live a life of conflict? Males eat shit all day for their family the LAST thing they want is to battle a dragon when they come home.

[MrDaveAPSI]

Girls who sort of lead the relationship. It's sexist to think that one or the other should be leading it.

[Rosexøxø]

Amen

[Anonymous]

men and women should be equal in a relationship in all aspects except the bedroom, where the man should be dominant

[Asker]

Sounds far. And if the woman is dominating at times in the bedroom would that turn you off. Do you feel as though you won't enjoy the sex

[Rosexøxø]

lol it sounds good but I call bs 😂 I think you’re one of the types that believes something like:

“Oh let her believe she’s in control.”

And then you’re both “happy…” right?

And you ensure you feel great when she performs ultimate submission in giving you her body lol

That’s hilarious tbh it was funny to read.

[Opinion Owner]

men should not be submissive in the bedroom. It's one step away from being tied up and dressed up like a french maid

[Rosexøxø]

So I suppose women naturally should fill those clothes and that role. They’re the French maid? Lol 😂

Well not in my book. They certainly can be- if they want to. If they wish to be other then they can also do so. No one is forced to be a French maid. Not man and certainly CERTAINLYYYY not women. 🤷‍♀️

[ButtBanger]

For beginners, a huge bubble butt is a sign that the female is powerful enough to crush my cock with her sheer weight.

[Rosexøxø]

Lmao I hate that term bubble? 🤮 omg lol

[Rosexøxø]

Joke was funny though

[Kelly6]

Dominant female is who runs the family as she wants, not just in bed but in everything she decides

[Anonymous]

I personally would like a dominant female as long as she is feminine dominant not masculine dominant

[Asker]

What's feminine dominant as opposed to masculine dominant can you pls explain

[Opinion Owner]

some girls has masculine energy, they talk and act like a male when they are dominating, I prefer a girl who can dominate and make man submit with her charm and feminine touch, so alluring.