Since women are now threatening to stop dating, having sex, etc., should men stop paying the bills?

[msc545]

[WestofNowhere]

Yup. This movement has no power. Hookers still provide a return for our money and they'll always be in business. I don't need to use them, but for a lot of guys, it's a cheaper way to go.

[msc545]

From a financial and psychological standpoint as well as a risk analysis, prostitutes are always a better choice. They cost less, you know the price ahead of time, they have better skills, and are usually a lot nicer and actually grateful - and - it's a sure thing.

[KrakenAttackin]

Absolutely. If women won't do their part, men have no reason to do the man's part.

[msc545]

but... but... protection!! Chivalry!! LOL!

[KrakenAttackin]

Yeah, feminist murdered chivalry.

[msc545]

Perhaps they need to be arrested?

[KrakenAttackin]

Morgan Stanley recently revised their projections of unmarried and single women by 2030. Now Morgan is saying 52% of women will be cat ranchers. I have zero sympathy.

[blackgaletiger]

No man continue to pay your bills. No sense in sacrificing your survival for others choices. You only put your self in debt.


However if your only in a relationship for sex or etc then there is no sense for the relationship. If woman refuse one object but are willing to play their roles in the relationship by providing other needs then it makes sense they refuse some objective. But if your only contribution to the relationship is financial income and hers is only providing sex and if she isn't holding up her end of the deal then i would agree to stop paying the bills or stop supporting financially.


Women refusing to date or have sex etc is their lose. Why make it yours

[NathanDavis]

I have absolutely nothing to do with all of that bullshit online...

the women in my life and around me down here... are still living their normal lives with no such bullshit

and I've never ever had to pay anybody's bills... from my first, back in high-school, to my most recent a couple of years ago... all of my partners have had their own jobs, their own careers, their own businesses and absolutely no need to be paid as if they were completely and absolutely hopeless without being given money

[Anonymous]

Well if a man is in a relationship with such a women, he should not only stop paying the bills] he should kick her cheap ass to the curb and not look in the rearview mirror.

As for single women who are in this category, I appreciate them being honest about their views, because they are doing all men a favor by outing themselves so we can just ignore them.

I also appreciate the fact that these women are voluntarily removing themselves from the gene pool, which benefits everyone of both genders, and society as a whole.

[Sevenpointfive]

i don't want to sound rude, but real women wouldn't do this. but stop paying their bills seriously. those aren't women and probably don't know the first thing about attracting a man. does vagina have a stock price? i see it dropping and becoming very cheap soon

[Fireguy17]

if a woman is not dating then there won't be a bill for they guy to pay.
Might just as well get that other motorcycle you wanted with all the money you are saving.

[msc545]

What bike did you have in mind? I'm in the market for a road bike myself...

[Fireguy17]

Are you leaning more towards the dual sport style, a cruiser, old school or a luxo liner?
For dual sport I'm kind of leaning towards Triumph, a Tiger 900.
Supposedly they are coming out with a new dual sport that is supposed to be something.
KTMs are good but I have heard that they might be having financial trouble.
Of course, BMW but they are pricy and expensive to service.
Old school I am partial to my Bonniville, and Hondas gold wings are hard to beat.
I have heard nothing but good things about their DCT bikes.

[msc545]

I think maybe a cruiser...

[Fireguy17]

There are a crap ton of cruisers out there, so it will come down to brand preference, price, color and what feels the best for you.
Everyone is built differently so a bike that is comfortable for me might not be a good fit for you.
There are all sorts of sites out there to get reviews from.
Make sure you can test ride it before you buy.
just sitting on it in the showroom is not the same as riding one.
The fat rear tire is a big look right now, but they can be a bit more work to turn, not to mention that tire is not going to be cheap to replace.
Around where I live there are quite a few places that just sell used bikes, so maybe go talk to them, and they will know a lot about what is out there.

[msc545]

I was thinking a BMW but you made good points about them. I shall have to go looking and riding! Thanks!

[Fireguy17]

good luck, and if you are not dating, why stop at just 1?
My buddy who I rode with today has 4 in his garage, I only have 2.

[msc545]

Well yes, but I might need a bigger garage... I already have 2 sports cars (a Porsche and a 2000 MR2 Spyder with 60K miles) and an everyday driver... so...

[Fireguy17]

you wedge it in there somewhere.
Be creative.

[msc545]

or maybe a garage addition... I can barely wedge myself in there now...

[Fireguy17]

Bike first and foremost, addition 2nd.
Priorities!

[msc545]

Good point!

[Fireguy17]

you had me worried for a minute there.
The bike can go inside of the house, problem solved.

[msc545]

Well sort of it could. The addition can be done in a week or less, so...

[Fireguy17]

good plan

[msc545]

ty for help

[Anonymous]

I haven’t dated a woman or had sex in 9 years, completely by choice, I had enough sex in my teens, to know that it’s amazing but it’s not get into a seriously relationship with someone horrible for my life amazing, and I’m not the type of dude who enjoys fucking random girls, I’m sure I could, but I’d be bad at it, no valuable women to date or have sex with, so I could care less.

[BoopBoopBeep]

I've seen the women "threatening" to not have sex any longer. I doubt many of them were before.

[Justneedtokno]

In one sense, should they stop paying their bills because if you are a single man living on your own, you should be paying your bills right. As there is a woman who lives on her own.

[msc545]

In another sense, you should try writing something that is actually coherent.

[slatyb]

There are plenty of women who pay their own bills

[msc545]

There are not "plenty of women" - there are relatively few, and the ones that do cannot wait to sag a man to take over their expenses.

[slatyb]

The days of a man supporting a woman with a semi-skilled job are long over. Women outnumber men in colleges and in obtaining degrees.

[msc545]

They get more education but they work less and make less money, and still expect men to pay their bills.

[msc545]

Stop simping. It is really unattractive.

[zagor]

These days if they did that I probably wouldn't notice.

[lightbulb27]

total rebellion...

men should stop taking showers! that'll show em...

[LiamJHayden]

A guy should not be paying the bills for a woman unless she has proven herself worthy of such a commitment. And pardon the crudeness, but a spread and some head is not enough.

[Apple1996]

Haven't most modern men already been doing that?

[Anonymous]

sometimes I don't understand why you're a Democrat when you're anti-feminist

[msc545]

You are not the first person to tell me that, but the truth is that the two things are not incompatible. I'm a Democrat because I don't like right-wing politics in that I don't like wars and cruelty to people.

I am anti-feminist because I'm a man and I'm one of the people that they treat like crap whenever they get the chance and that they discriminate against whenever they get the chance. I support other men and I am against the kind of discriminatory and ugly behavior that feminists engage in. I understand that a lot of people on the left and a lot of Democrats support feminists but I certainly do not.

[msc545]

If you think about this a bit people on the right discriminate against anyone who's not white. On the left supporters of feminists discriminate against anyone who is not a man. I am against all forms of discrimination. It's that simple.

[Opinion Owner]

if you're truly anti-war then why support Kamala and Liz Cheney over Trump and Tulsi Gabbard?

if you're against cruelty then why support the side of censorship and neglect?

there's racists on both sides towards minorities. the left side is a lot worse when they believe they own your vote may it be black conservatives, Asian conservatives, latino conservatives etc.

[msc545]

Probably because the last several major wars (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) have all been started by Republicans. Both sides are into censorship. The right is heavily into suppressing voting.

Neither side is perfect, but the right disgusts me more.

[Opinion Owner]

you're referring to warmongering neocons that Trump has rid from his party hence Drain the Swamp. both Democrats and Republicans aren't the same as before

wanting voter ID isn't suppressing voting. the left is actively engaging in social media bans and removing information that goes against their narrative

[msc545]

No I am referring to Trump himself. Wanting voter ID and banning mail-in voting ID is in fact the supression of voting.

[Opinion Owner]

no it's for the fairness and clarification of voting. there's no argument against that

[msc545]

I guess we will need to agree to disagree then. There is a very good argument against it, but let's not do that unless you really want to...

[Opinion Owner]

accusations of racism is the only argument they have. we may not agree in other politic areas though we can agree that feminism is a cancer to society

[msc545]

I think racism is a cogent and serious argument along with the fact that presently, without voter ID, there has been NO voting fraud. On the other hand, we can agree that feminism has been obviously incredibly destructive.

[Opinion Owner]

Trump lost only the states without voter ID and won every state with voter ID. anyone without voter ID can claim whoever they are without evidence and not be a registered voter regardless of race

[msc545]

I guess we can always find reasons to justify outcomes in this case. However, let's be aware of the fact that there is absolutely no external evidence of voting fraud in that very few people have been arrested for it and those that have have turned out to be Republicans who are voting Republican paradoxically enough. There might be a little bit of voting fraud occurs occasionally, but certainly not enough to affect the results of any public elections. It's a complete non-starter.

[Opinion Owner]

I guess those extra 15 million voters who voted for Biden over Trump in 2020 suddenly "disappeared" in 2024 for Kamala despite Biden having a more boring lackluster campaign

[msc545]

I think they were tired of it and just didn't bother. Enough.