Like if the options were no, somewhat, yes, very and you decide someone is somewhat attractive is that good enough or do you need yes or very
hope this makes sense
Like if the options were no, somewhat, yes, very and you decide someone is somewhat attractive is that good enough or do you need yes or very
hope this makes sense
Since I don't date, that question does not apply to me. However, if I was forced to date or was depending on someone for whatever reason, then the looks would not be my criteria to have to date that person.
Looks fade with time and a person that may have looked good at age 20 will certainly no longer look pristine at age 70. What then?
On the other hand, if you have a person with a great intellect, an excellent character and interesting personality, you are more likely to have the same traits when he/she is 70. Those 3 assets usually stay a lifelong but not looks.
everyone is somewhat attractive... when you really think about it
That’s perfectly fine
Opinion
2Opinion
No id rather let that person move on and be with someone who finds them 100% attractive. That's not fair to them to have a partner who thinks they're mid
Is that what it means mid? The issue is most people are gonna be mid. They say beauty is subjective but it’s pretty objectively and conventionally true
Mid means 5/10. Most people in my opinion have beautiful things about them so there aren't many mid people to me so this would never be a issue but if for some random reason I did think that person is 5/10 I'd let them go to find someone who thinks they're 10/10. It has nothing to do with me but more for their own benefit
Yes. I'm only interested in avg. Women like Kim Kardashian and Scarlett Johansson.
😴😴😴😴😴