Why do men think “providing” certain women for just existing is masculine? Isn’t it masculine to reward instead for anything she gives first?

[Babygirl_S]

Okay! Maybe you find her look interesting or attractive but are you going to reward her for just existing? Maybe that’s how many men lose power in a society. For example, she can cook for you and then you take her to a good restaurant. Maybe she makes you feel like a king first so you don’t have to be submissive calling her a princess first. Do these men ever feel exhausted for giving that much? Even feminine women who are givers get exhausted.

[glennos89]

I'm going to give you a simple example...

Imagine that WW3 breakers out and that it's going to be nuclear warfare where the only logical outcome will be that most infrastructure like electricity, water, food and building are vanished. That would mean we are pretty back to basic where we have to hunt for food, build shelters and find water sources to be able to survive.

If this scenario would happen, who do you think is going to hunt animals to get meat, who will be making fire, who will do the cooking and who will look after the children making sure they are safe?

The answer is simple, men will fall back in providing and protecting and woman will fall back into cooking, laundry and taking care of the children 🤷🏼‍♂️

[Berethor]

Princess is not expected to cook, that's why a housewife tend to be more useful.

https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Housewife