Yes
No
Not sure
Other
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
No, absolutely not. There needs to be NO talk of sexuality in kids shows.
Transgender people represent far less than 1% of the population. If someone puts the occasional trans-gender person into a show made for and marketed to adults, fine. But that crap absolutely needs to be kept away from kids.
And make no mistake - 10 years from now, when all these "gender-affirming parents" are dealing with their kids ending themselves because they sterilized themselves and butchered their bodies and doctors shrug and say "nothing more we can do", there's going to be a BIG reckoning against all of the people pushing trans ideology onto kids. It will be akin to ardent pro-National Socialists from Germany in the early 40s - because these people will have destroyed (and often contributed greatly to the end of) the lives of so many children.
It's already starting, but like anything else, it's going to take a while before there's a critical mass of such victims who realize what a huge mistake they've made, usually with the rabid encouragement of their parents, who in most cases wanted to score "woke points" among their woke-believing social circles. Children have NO BUSINESS being involved in any of this stuff - AT BEST, it's a topic that should be strictly dealt with by adults.
No. In fact kids TV shows should focus on escapism and fun - not indoctrination into an ideology. This is literally what Mao, Hitler, and Stalin did: program young minds with the propaganda of what’s best for impressionable young children. It’s absolute evil.
lol is having diversity indoctrination now? Is showing a black person on tv going to make the white kids black?
How did you bring race into this? It’s not even a racial topic.
@CrabCakes11 trans is not diversity it's literally a mental disorder based on sexuality. Children are not thinking about sexuality they simply know boy and girl. They only think it's possible to change them when pedophiles try to tell them you can switch genders (based on no science only linguistic definitions) and that there's more than 2 genders. It's literally detrimental to society, it's a mental disorder and teaching children is degenerate
@CrabCakes11 race is a immutable characteristic. You don’t have a choice which race you were came into this world as.
Being trans IS a choice. A permanent choice if you get surgery. And nobody under 18 should be doing this.
@bobby_bush_eater Nobody is trying to trans the children. Chill out
@blueonblack22 Being trans isn’t the same thing as getting surgery, most trans people don’t get surgery. No minors are getting surgery.
Why do we have to spend so much effort to accommodate the questionable whims and wants of 2% of the population? You want to teach kids about your way of life then go start a trans-tutor after-school program and let parents pay for your time & message. If there truly is a need then the time proven supply and demand dynamic will support this.
@CrabCakes11 first of all the public school system absolutely is and certain states have passed legislation that if the parent refuses to affirm their gender the state can take the child and they can puberty blockers. It's disgustingly dystopian.
There are only 2 genders and you cannot change them. Sex and gender are the same things. Having personal pronouns make 0 sense.
@bobby_bush_eater Lol Ok bud
@CrabCakes11 I'd love to hear a rebuttal on how you can change genders. Or how is there more than one gender? Your argument shouldn't be in the semantics of the English definition of gender either...
I like how your rational argument vanished so easily, CrabCakes.
Don’t hold your breath Bobby_Bush_Eater. This type can only hide behind sarcasm and hyperbole. Logic is not an arrow in their quiver.
Coming from someone who grew up when LGBT representation was on TV, kids won't understand what they're watching. I saw an episode of American Dad multiple times called LGB-Steve, let me quote to you the dialogue:
"Having a penis doesn't make you a boy."
"It doesn't?"
"Are you positive?"
"Obviously, Stevie is a girl trapped in a boy's body."
What was my response? I thought it was science fiction and didn't read into it. Oh, and that's not the only time that happened. Off the top of my head I can remember 2 other shows I watched with trans themes.
And yet perplexingly I have not cut off my genitalia 😭 Can we stop overreacting, guys? This isn't going to turn your kids trans
It's the same with gay representation. If two boys held hands I would study the frame and ask aloud 'which one is the girl?'. I was raised conservative, so I was never told what that was and it didn't phase me.
Raise your kids right. If you don't want them to hear things, don't tell it to them. All they know from ages 0-8 is what their parents and teachers have told them 💀
Never said they were, all I said was i watched them as a kid
The Futurama episode where Bender had a sex change to compete against the fembots was very prophetic.
You ever notice how they're trying to shove wokeness down our throats, yet this wasn't the case with older generations who didn't have half of the problems as a society that we do today (and it's only getting worse, just look at all the 12 year olds at Sephora)
Also remember how they were all saying "oh we just want to live our lives we aren't going to target children"
Opinion
38Opinion
Abso-fucking-lutely NOT!
It's an attempt to romanticize transgenderism, make it seem cool, and brainwash kids into thinking it is normal. The idea is to confuse kids so that they can be steered into thinking that they might be transgender, as if there is any such thing.
Its a war on children and the agenda is to destroy society.
Of course not, we already have enough brainwashing going on without it happening on TV as well. They already have too much PC in kids TV shows. This is just what the woke brigade want, this is how they do it through kids.
Here in the UK we have kids as young as three changing their gender and teenagers who have become adults regretting such a decision.
Here's my argue: Why not?
They mostly give out QUEER relationships in shows.
Dont believe me? The two cops in Gravity Falls? Applejack x Rainbow Dash in My Little Pony?
So why not they also start to give trans-genders and even non-binary characters as they already started with such relationships and violance scenes in the shows?
This is one of those questions that doesn't have a black and white, yes or no, answer. The problem is one of scale. Trans people make up a very small percentage of society, yet movies, TV shows, and kid cartoons often portray them as main characters, and that IMHO is questionable.
What’s wrong with trans main characters?
@CrabCakes11 for one humans can not biologically medically or scientifically be trans... we lack the genetic information to transition from male to female. Cutting off a dick or tearing out a uterus doesn't change sex or gender. To genuinely do that one would need to transition their entire body. Xx chromosomes to xy or vice versa. A vagina and corresponding reproductive organs to a penis and corresponding reproductive organs. And vica versa. Estrogen to testosterone or vice versa. Etc. Humans do not have that genetic information or ability. As such it is an impossibility to be trans. That doesn't mean at some point in the next million years we won't evolve to that but at least right now. It is purely psychological and in most cases it goes away on its own
It depends on the target audience. If the aim is more of preteens & teens, then those characters will be there. If it's a little kids show they're less likely to be present or not at all. You won't see them in PJ Masks or Bluey, but you'll see them in Star VS the Forces of Evil & Dead End Paranormal Park.
LOL at this point parents like never before need to monitor what kids watch and read online and on TV.
True. But no parent can monitor a kid 100% of the time.
Nope. Woke should be classified as domestic terrorism it fits the description given their proclivity to threaten bombing and murder if they don't get their way
Define woke
@DrPepper12 as you wish. A liberal left leaning person attempting to force things like "pride month" down normal people's throats as it is a "social issue and they need respect blah blah"
That's it? How do you define "liberal" or "left"? What other "things"? What constitutes "force"? Whats "normal"?
If asked for a definition, one needs to definitive... @JacobJordan
@DrPepper12 that is quite definitive mate lol. Liberal and left are synonyms for democratic peoples. Force has several definitions all related to exertion of x regardless of what y (the thing being exerted on) does. Ie a locked door being forced open. Force is applied to the door to change it from closed to open. Normal again very standard definition. The majority of the populace that understands certain facts that have been facts for millenia and continue to be facts today. Ie men can not be women and should not be allowed in women's restrooms, lockerrooms, sports, etc. And women can not be men and should not be allowed in men's restrooms, lockerrooms, sports etc. Or that abortion is murder of a child. Or cheating is wrong, or abuse is wrong etc etc etc. Normal things. If you are incapable of understanding the definition that is not a me problem that is a you problem.
Another absolutist cafeteria "conservative" narcissist who loves fun house mirrors and echo chambers instead of facts & reality. And I'm not your mate, I don't breed with you. See? Words matter!
@DrPepper12 see perfect example. You don't know the meaning of the word mate. And you are a woke broke joke. Look how fast you through that woke bitch fit after getting called out. Sorry tranny supporter you aren't allowed near me children.
Cool with me pale, stale, male! G'day mate! 😂🤷🏻♂️🙄
@DrPepper12 I spend way to much time outside to be pale 🤣🤣🤣 stupid liberal
It's a euphemism for white. Pay attention next time.
@DrPepper12 that's racist wokey. Thought you libtards were against racism.
Transvestite & homosexual characters should never be on kids TV shows, nor any medium that kids might access.
No, because there's no need to introduce a complex topic at a young age. If the kid isn't old enough for the birds and bees talk, then they're not old enough to grasp what transgenderism really is.
If they're not old enough to cognitively understand what they are seeing it'll go in one ear and out the other. It's like showing algebra to a 5 year old, they quite literally will not understand it 😭 So what's the harm in it?
@wiltingrosepetal I understand what you're saying but it's not that simple. The inquisitive child is going to be perplexed and that becomes either a setback or opens up the door questions that they are not going to know the answer to.
So, to use your example, just like you don't bother teaching you algebra to the little kids, you don't bother teaching about transgenders to little kids.
Eventually, a child is going to run into a transgender anyway in the real world and that should be the initiation towards that series of questioning.
I think it’s a bit funny, but adult content should be left in adult rated movies.
Kids shouldn’t be planning marriage or a beach house party. They should just be friends with other kids.
no, that is bizarre. let kids be kids. just have senseless violence
I want Hollywood to destroy itself. Throw a Frisbee for your puppy. Take your puppy on a canoe ride.
This is the only show I like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqFXw8iqorg
There's been Trans characters in kids media for decades. No one batted an eye.
I know no one's here trying to forget about all the times Bugs did it.
That's completely false. What you are looking at in these pictures you posted are DISGUISES, worn to fool the opponent and trick them. There was never any "gender identity" associated with these disguises - Bugs never "felt that he should have been born a female" or any of that crap. I'm sure you didn't originate this idea - I'm sure it really came from some trans activist - but it's categorically wrong, and taken completely out of its original context. I'm sure they did so because most of their audience isn't familiar enough with Bugs Bunny to know what the original context was, and assumed that the false framing of said activist was true. It wasn't - it was an obvious lie and manipulation - but that pretty much sums up the whole "trans rights movement."
Out of all of the drugs, sex, violence and crude humor kids see on TV, but yes, no trans characters. Fully ok for my kid to watch a cartoon about drugs or music about sex, but a trans character, that’s way too much.
No, these Hollyweird perverts need to stop pushing this disgusting insanity on children.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/oGtseVUw-_MNo, that’s a bad idea. it’s sets a bad influence
There is an agenda behind all this and it’s heinous. It’s not innocuos.
No. I mean, no offense to them.. but kids are easily influenced from what they watch.
I don’t think there is a firm yes or no for this, it would depend on the age the show is geared for and how it is presented. If they person is just there and it isn’t be pushed on anyone probably a non-issue
No. Leave kids and their shows alone. Stop shoving this all in their faces.
No, I don't think these type of topics should be forced into kids.
You can also add your opinion below!