

No i prefer, the role models today.
Yes, i think they were.
I don't like any of them.
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 

Most of the time. Although in general while I dont' have a fav body type per say and please don't thing I am a vamp kid for saying per say. In general I've found myself being most attracted to women in terms of face and body who are like musicians and artists. Maybe I am being bias, actually as a matter of fact I know I am, but There is something about creative women that really drives me insane especially a woman with a beautiful voice and who can like play like a violin or piano or something , any instrument really.
Older beauties were more classy, though some were just as promiscuious as today's. I have a real appreciation for the classic beauties, but modern ones have more genetic diversity, and can get really really pretty, and I think modern girls have better bodies too, as a majority. I think today's models are too shallow, and not real in any way. Also, they all wear their makeup the same, and too much of it sometimes. So I think they're both beautiful, but the newer ones are hotter, and the older ones had more style/class
I think that the classic beauties were more beautiful because almost everyone in hollywood today relies on plastic surgery, photoshop, etc. I feel like because technology & cosmetic surgery at that time weren't an option for those women, they had to get by with makeup, lighting, & their God given features. They look a lot more realistic too which appeals to me. They didn't completely reconstruct their faces with makeup and they all had their own distinctive looks.
I think the classic beauties are more attractive than today's women. The classic women were.. classy. they had taste, self worth, self respect and class. They could be sexy without looking like a slut. Today's girls are all about wanting to be the baddest and sexiest and have no self value or respect. But that's just my opinion. To each their own
Exactly... I agree I hate how we've all but abandoned femininity
I know! I do too!
I love the classic look. That was before women had to be skin and bones to be a model. But I see things moving that way again. Not to say kim isn't beautiful but ladies back then were real. They didn't use anything other then makeup and stylish clothes to enhance their beauty. Real boobs, real noses, real wrinkles.
Thanks✌
I much prefer the classic beauties! They had class, charm, grace and self respect and that's what is the most beautiful about them! :) Also in my opinion, the fashions and beauty standards from the past were so much more appealing and beautiful. As time goes by fashion honestly gets worst... :(
Opinion
42Opinion
No silicon back then Audrey Hepburn was beautiful inside and out.
Absolutely the classic beauties are way more than beautiful than today's actresses (mostly). They r all genuine and don't get plastic surgeries often I guess
Can't even compare them. The women of today, that a lot of girls look up to, are mostly trash. Can't even compare sleeveens (irish slang) like the Kardashians, Miley Cyrus, or Nicki Minaj with classy women like Eleanor Parker:
I'll definitely say that the classics were better, in any way. Back then, it was a luxury style not everyone could afford. Almost everybody dreamed at least once of being a celebrity back then. Nowadays, modern celebrities are pretty much fake. There are only a few left that are still somewhat normal, even though they have the money & fame to evolve into a megabitch. But yet, some didn't. Only for them that stayed the same I have the respect for. The others are spoilt with daddy's money.
B
on a studio contract, there was much more studio investment into an image than affordable today... perhaps too many movies going on waters down the quality of everything associated
of course natural beauties always have a chance but even back then these were scooped up for private business by both wealthy & royalty
Someone below mentioned Sarah Snyder, who really doesn't do a thing for me, (Celeste Desjardin is way hotter) and Alexis Ren, who is most definitely a modern bombshell. For sure she is drop dead gorgeous. But so was Marilyn, Audrey, Elizabeth, Raquel Welch, Ann-Margaret, etc. So I gotta go with the classic beauty for the long haul. * And an aside - All the Kardashians are gross and YES, I would throw them out of bed... ewwww.
@VaIiant Thank you...
@VaIiant I agree.. brunettes with ANY color guys are like slow burning, sultry fires. Blondes are like firecrackers - lots of noise, a big pop, then gone !!
Modern beauties mainly sell on sex appeal, classic ones are a lot less revealing. I think that modern ones are a lot more desirable for meaningless sex however the classic ones just naturally make me want to fall in love with them.
There were beautiful women then and there are beautiful women now. None that you mentioned are to my liking, but I lean more towards modern beauties. I don't like the hair and makeup trends of the past that much.
Compared to the plastic fakey fakertons sure absolutely :D compared to beauties that haven't gone the plastic route yet sure, but the difference ain't that big.
I like some old fashioned style better, but naturally beautiful women are just as beautiful as they were in the past. Maybe better today because of better health standards.
Some were, some weren’t. As a whole, the classic beauties seem to be more prim, proper, and classy, whereas some of my favorites of today have a beautiful, casual, girl next door look.
cf.girlsaskguys.com/.../...0-bea8-ca810f54843b.jpg Yes, i think they were.
Please take Kim Kardashian out of that line up. I think that the values that women currently hold are what the problem is. For women in the past 'class' actually existed, not for all, but at least the concept was promoted
You should have a 4th choice. Classic beauty is the same as current beauty. Unless you are asking a different question.
still think that kind of make up is enough for nowdays
The classic beauties definitely are more attractive.
Ummm, going by the picture choice you gave, the classics were waaay better. But I think there's amazing and horrendous in both eras.
You can have classic beauty in today's women as well.
How come no pictures of black women from back in the day? I'm assuming those hairstyles are classic to white people. All of them women are ugly, full of makeup and hoes.
It's hard not to be more attractive than Kim Kardashian. Compare the classic women to Alexis Ren or Sarah Snyder, and it's a totally different story..
By classic you mean white women because those are the examples i see..
Bringing race into it... surprise surprise
Yeah because the only examples she used are white women duhh for classy and Kim Kardashian who obviously isn’t fully white as “ trashy” 🙄
Can we all just be beautiful geez !!
cf.girlsaskguys.com/.../...8-8d9f-490c7b5afa8f.jpg No i prefer, the role models today.
I don't think classic ones were beautiful. But I hate modern fake beauties. I see no beauties in them.
Yes because they are genuinely beautiful no cosmetic surgery no photo filters
The modern ones dont have any identity to them. They are just riding on the waves of the trends.
No i think they all are attractive i can't choose just one set of beauties.
I like tomboys, not traditional girls. Tomboys are badass
Classic beauties vs Plastic beauties
I'm picking Classic beauties 👌
there's a few of the current ones I'd say are more attractive. Definitely not kim kardashian, but other people
i agree, classic beauties are more attractive and beautiful
Both are fine and all, but don't exactly expect me to stare so long my eyes bleed on both ends. For some reason the people that "define beauty" aren't as beautiful to me as they are to other people.
Nope, their both equally attractive in their own ways.
No but they are still very attractive in their own way
PrincessPie is the most attractive beauty
lol, i'm not one tho
Yes. More attractive and more respectable.
Interesting
To be fair though, I'm biased simply because of the fact that back then models dressed more conservatively, which I personally find more reputable and morally upright and thus more beautiful.
They had and still have considerable more class than today's models, ya dig?
Hiding parts enhances more beauty than exposing !
No question and no contest! Give me "yesterday"!
I like the classic beauties more
Classic beauty can still outshine the current one
lol those visual aids weren't biased at all
lkr, fuckin annoying
Kardashians are a bad example.
Everything Old Fashioned CERTAINLY had it good!
They're certainly trashier today
Both are great in very different ways.
Older ones have a stronger sense of simple beauty and creative class. :)
Newer ones have a stronger sense of sexuality and... well, I guess that’s usually about it. rofl But it makes girls feel dignified as they gets guys drooling in it. ;)
I love both.
Some are some are not
None of these women are my type.
Oh hell yeah.
Real beauty, new or classic, beats fake any day.
The old ones were euro-centrist.
Except for the plastic ones, I love them all.
eh i’m indifferent
Both
None
They were
Not necessarily
I think the classic were natural more
100% classic
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions