Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Is there anything in you've bought in your short life that you like just as much 10 years later? Clothes, makeup, jewelry, hairstyles?
How many older women do you see out and about, that you are able to pinpoint the exact decade they gave up by how dated thier hairstyle is?
Do you look the same as you did 10 years ago? Or as you will look 10 years from now?
Let's say you pick the perfect tattoo 100% enhancement to your current look. (And how often does that happen?)
How long will a tattoo last?
It's a permanent accessory to your ever changing look. No matter what you do at some point it will detract from your natural beauty. It's just a matter of time.
I have piercings and one tattoo. I am getting another one soon. I think if it's tasteful and well done it can look nice. You really have to consider what it will look like in the future and also really think what you are getting is meaningful and thoughtfully planned out. Personally I don't like tattoos that are just random pictures because you like it. To me I design and think about every tattoo and all my tattoos have multiple meanings wrapped into it. No one is going to really know what mine mean unless I tell them. And I like it that way. Each one has a story. This is my first tattoo on my forearm. If it's going to be visible it can't be offensive. So be careful with that.
I think it can go either way.
A well-designed and applied tattoo can enhance and add to a woman's natural beauty.
A poorly designed or poorly applied tattoo can make even the hottest woman look trashy.
Depends on the person and the tattoo, I think. One of the reasons being at my ideal weight/build for a few years is necessary for me (alongside keeping the same tattoo design for three years) before getting a significant piece.
Tattoos can be art, but art takes time and consideration.
To each their own. Naturalness is beautiful because it's you. If you feel you must tattoo your body it's your prerogative but remember it does visually take away from the impact you may have wanted because instead of beauty you've advertisements on the body which will make you react. Good or bad is up to you but everyone reacts differently. Instead of concentrating on the person first hand you pay attention subliminally to the tattoos which can affect the rapport you're attempting to establish. Same rhino g like perforated jewelry rings in all the places.
Opinion
107Opinion
Women are beautiful no matter what they choose to do with their own bodies. A lot of the guys on here are pretty anti-tattoos it seems--which is fine, everybody has their preferences and they should look for people who adhere to those preferences.
But that being said, women with and without tattoos are all beautiful.
to me, tats are gorgeous.
Like said, they can limit your career.
As long as a woman has tasteful, well drawn and inked tats, I love them. When they are poorly done, or gross, nasty or violence oriented, they are not nice.
Or worse, when your skin color is Ink, not flesh tone, then you probably would look good working a carnival or circus.
I dont have any yet... just like i have my ears pierced and a Monroe, I would so love more.
Tattoos can do both I think. Location is a huge factor, what it is really determines if it adds or not. Tats look good on some and not others. One of my friends, really close friend I'll add and not in a sexual manner what so ever, has 3 paw prints on her hip. When she wears shorts you see 1, the other 2 are farther up and hidden. She has a gorgeous figure and legs and that tat adds a bit of sexiness to her. It has a very huge sentimental value to her, which I know, and that's why she got it. Yet others, who d9nt know, see it as sexy and attractive. Now take those prints put them somewhere else, and it loses the effect. Not the sentimental value, but the physical appeal.
So, to recap, in my opinion they can both add and take away from a womans appearance.
If it's over done, then it can be distraction. Once you put them on the face then it can definitely take away someone's natural beauty.
Tattoos are an amazing way to tell the world who a person is or how they feel about the world around them without saying a word. One thing I know for sure, take your time and pick a professional artist who has high standards of cleanliness and a tattoo you can live with, because tattoos are difficult to remove and difficult to cover. And a dirty environment can be very dangerous for your health.
Depends on where it is I mean long as it's not painted all across her face or she have a plate in her lip or a elephant bone through her nose she's good to go now unless your living in deep deep deep darkest part of Africa then you can wear shrunken heads around your neck and be crowned queen of the day just don't piss her off guy can lose his head very quickly
I feel like I have a strange attitude about tattoos.
On one hand, I find many of them, especially on women, to be very sexy, but if I think about ever getting one myself, my mind immediately says no way.
It's not that I think they're wrong or immoral, at least consciously.
I just don't think they would fit my personality.
Most of the time it detracts. But some women can pull it off. Too many people get tats just to be getting them.
Tats are like the 2000s equivalent of bumper stickers. If someone has something to say then say it. Don't put it permanently on your skin. At least with bumper stickers you can peal it off a few years from now when you decide it's lame.
I hate to see women with really good skin complexion get tats. Good healthy looking skin is so attractive, and they ruin it.
As much as the debate about tattoos goes, personally if the tattoos have meaning and purpose then they add huge amounts of beauty to both genders if they are meaningless then there isn't a point to them. Al the people I've known with tattoos use them to tell a story of there life a point they either want to imortallize or remember for reasons. So no they don't de track from natural beauty if it's for the right reasons
No, I think tattoos are fab and they actually add to a person's beauty. Most people are just conformists xx
If the tattoo is inked well. It looks gorgeous. For example- this girl's tattoo looks gorgeous.
I don't mind the typical tramp stamp on the lower back, or the small stuff usually seen on the base of the neck/ankle/etc... but women with full in sleeves, up the back of their legs and full back pieces NO. I want a nice sexy, smooth skin woman.
No I think it adds to her personality of who she is.
Makeup on the other hand takes away a woman's natural beauty, I think if a woman Wears makeup, it should be because she wants it as an adaptation of her personality, not because she's insecure of the way she looks.
.
Like how goths/moshers do.
Yes. They take away from her natural beauty.
Girls, just because you saw a model on Instagram who looked sexy and happened to have tattoos, does not mean getting a tattoo will make you more attractive. Or that that tattoo adds to her appearance.
Stop getting impulse tattoos.
no not if done in moderation, but if done to excess they can detract and over crowd their looks :P :P :P
I find them a distraction and a net negative. Aside from damaging (not enhancing) their bodies I look at the psychological component.
Why get it?
Because friends did it? She's not an independent thinker?
Because it looks cool? Does she take a long term view of things? Tattoos don't age well.
Because she feels incomplete or ugly without it? Does she have self image issues?
Sometimes a tattoo is just a tattoo but I vote no.
Some people add to the sexual appeal depending on the type of tattoo Othes seem to definitely down graded Like everything You have to have the right shape and beware how you will feel about them in 10 or 20 years time Seen an elderly Vicar with spider webs all over his hands but there again I felt good on you
It depends, a little ink might enhance the natural beauty but any more than that becomes the target for the eyes and takes away from her natural beauty.
Body art makes the body the canvas for the art instead of the art... ;)
Typically, yes. I do understand that the women of the world aren't required to care that I feel that way though. lol Just personal preference. I find I'm more bothered by tattoos on a woman if I met her before they were there, so maybe I'm more bothered by the woman being changed than I am by the appearance of the tattoos themselves.
I dont have any yet I love guys body coverd in tattoos it's so hot
