“I can not discover the least bit of threads upon the looms….”, says the Minister.
During Parade:“But the Emperor has no clothes” says the child.-And that’s the damn truth these days with 8 year olds looking at pornography like this via Internet
it is a 1835-1840 Danish literary work. Emperor’s Clothes, I think. Fyi, It is a take off of Adam/Eve fall and recognition of nakedness.
I am deeply, DEEPLY disappointed at my realization that the dress in the first picture probably actually IS that transparent, and not just colored to match the background of those stairs with a picture of her legs, because I would TOTALLY wear that out somewhere, if only for the stares I'd get. And possibly killing someone with laughter.
Pretty but not for me, obviously. But, even if I was older, I don't see myself in something like that. Some sexy girly lingerie, sure, but those dresses? Where would I ever wear something like that - the mall when we go to the city?
I can't think of any of the girls or woman I know who could wear something like that except MAYBE my oldest cousin because, TBH, she has a body like a model.
I like the style but you only really see actresses wear that to cause commotion I bet they would never wear that to a regular party or get together which is why most of us non famous people could never really wear something like that unless it's Halloween or similar.
famous people wear this style for the same reason other famous wear weird stuff... for ATTENTION.
The dresses displayed are mainly worn as a kind of art. It’s Haute Couture. It’s definitely an acquired taste and most definitely something that most cannot wear outside of the red carpet. Personally, as art forms they are actually quite pretty, especially on a woman who’s in impeccable shape. Would I wear one…Hmmm depends….
I don't understand the point of it. I mean I don't care if people prefer to be naked at the nude beaches, but... At grand events, I expect them to wear something that looks a bit classy. That is way too transparent, I could see her underwear. So, I would rather see her in dresses which doesn't reveal what colour of underwear she's wearing.
Can be pretty. Fine for the red carpet or a party. I think the first one looks silly because you can clearly see the underwear, the two other dresses are built smart with in-build coverage of essential parts. About the person I think that they like their body and want to show it off a bit. For celebrities that is no wonder.
It's sensual in a way definitely fap material. What i appreciate about them is the candidate that has to put a real effort to carry it gently otherwise it could tear and you would be just naked infront of all.
I really wonder how they carry themselves so elegently that's tough i understand they do have loads of wardrobe malfunction.
I even saw some celebrity was wearing just a trash bag lol
The real issue with dresses like these is that mostly women are shown oversexualized constantly in the media. It puts quite a bit of pessure on regular women to have to try up their game. Thing is, these women have personal trainers that get paid a fortune. They have make up artists to make them flawless. Nah, not my cup of tea
Women who wear "naked dresses" are usually seeking attention, or someone (the dress designer?) is paying them for the publicity. It's very non-feminine and bordering on slutty.
I personally dont find people who wear such kinds of dresses attractive.. i prefer them clothed tbh but again its their choice as long as theyre ok and comfortable with it, i dont care really
I sincerely hope it's something that just celebrities feel a need to wear. It might look sexy or hot but it's highly sexual therefore not attractive to me.
I like them but I wouldn't wear one out of respect for other and myself I'm not body confident and as for others I wouldn't want make them feel awkward
