$3000 Luis Vuitton bag. Is it really worth it?

[Anonymous]

[jamesgoldman]

Personally no because I'm a guy and handbags aren't my scene

N. b. Chanel would be the better investment because they retain better market value in line with inflation and can be bought pre-loved for a fair price
Hermès isn't going to be an option at that price point given lower end Birkins are like $10,000

[CloudMassacre]

I would personally get a lot of different things with $3000 than a bag that will be falling apart in two years

[JustinTheGreat]

If you have the money and it won’t cause you to go broke, I’d say fuck it and go for it. You only live once, so what makes you happy

[JustinTheGreat]

Plus Louis Vuitton’s always keep their value, the bag could even go up in value one day. So if you ever need to sell it for whatever reason, you’ll most likely make all your money back

[Graci_e]

If you’ve got the money for it, then hell yes it is.

[InsertNameHerex]

Nooo get it second hand for way cheaper. I got a $3000 bag for $500 and it was authentic brand new and barely used.

[CAPTAIN-OBVIOUS]

man if you have that money to drop on it then sure. I can’t judge you because I’ve spent more money on things some people would consider stupid.

[Smashingdoozy]

Not if you can't spell it

[Sluttt]

No all bags get ugly after you use it for one year you need a new one after

[Anonymous]

I built my PC for that much money and that sounds infinitely more useful to me.

[RuthlessAggression]

If you've got the money

[whereismyjohnny]

Nope.

[SlothySlob]

Personally, no.

[Headstrongcrazylover]

Nope not worth