Did you know girls have only worn pants for 100 years?

[RandomGuy1030]

Before you say guys wear skirts or a kilt, you're wrong. The kilt was a loin cloth given to scottish lumberjacks by an English lumber company. It was the cheapest work clothing they could give them.

Another tidbit i learnt recently from Juvenals Satires (50ce) was the roman equivalent for "bitch" was toga wearer. The toga was like a male dress suit

didn't know

Other

Updates

+1 y

"Togata" would mean bitch. But literally means a girl who wears a toga

Updates

+1 y

Women rose to power in rome in about 200 bc, after the carthaginian war wiped out 50% of the young male population. So thats when they began wearing togas. Just fyi

[Red-Blaze]

If US was the world... maybe? but even then its likely false, just not in the high fasion area

Reardless:
https://en. m. wikipedia. org/wiki/Trousers_as_women%27s_clothing

Even skipping all the read the vase show what you say is likely false
Amazon wearing trousers and carrying a shield with an attached patterned cloth and a quiver. Ancient Greek Attic white-ground alabastron, ca. 470 BCE, British Museum, London.
I mean its most likely just been a think that work at the time, before anyone bother to make it an issue
Same with man wearing skirts, skirt is cheap and easy to make, its simple yet gives some elemnt protection so likely was even waaaay before pants start even showing up at all

[RandomGuy1030]

Amazon's were transgenders. They cut their breasts off. They don't count

[Red-Blaze]

So.. its a "This dose not fit my native it dose not count" type?
Can you provide sources to anything you post?
Also you may want to read, I just give the amazon as a fast no need to read, it was not the only one there

[RandomGuy1030]

Your one example of a myth of transgenders

[Red-Blaze]

I give a link to a full Wikipedia, the example is because you seem not to read so to make it really short
there is more there

[Red-Blaze]

Also your amazon thing is BS? or can you provide souces?

[RandomGuy1030]

Your link shows im right. Joan of whatever the fuck was burnt alive by the king of france for cross dressing 1000 years ago. Thats how long its been wrong for a female to wear pants. Just because you make them hug your ass doesn't make them female clothing.

[RandomGuy1030]

"It *seems* men and women wore pants among the aryan people". How the fuck would they know that? Can you explain to me in what culture men and women have ever worn the same clothes?

[Red-Blaze]

No one said its the same you can have a difference on small parts
Like the Toga for one example

Anyway you made it clear, you can point to sources to anything you say, so there is no point to talk this as you can make up anything that fit your nartive disconnected from reality as you wish
best of luck to you

[jshm2]

You need to get a better education, son. American education is fucking shit.

The kilt is from around the Scottish 16th century, and the colours and patterns used were how families identified each other. Even today each Scottish clan has it's own tartan. It was never "cheap".

Your "tidbit" is also wrong.