Remember, we are commenting on tattoos, not on asses. asses. 🤐
I hate tats on women's bodies.
They are completely pointless. No matter what the design, they improve nothing. They certainly don't make a woman look more beautiful.
Women's bare flesh looks soft and delicate. Tats make it look callous.
They detract from her femininity and make her look low class or trailer trash or ghetto or porn star or druggie or simply low IQ.
Tats are a distraction from her perfect appearance. When a woman has tats, that's all my eyes can focus on and it's like having the same grotesque image in the corner of your TV screen every time you watch TV.
Tats are like graffiti or like the doodles someone makes when they are bored.
They are a form of self mutilation.
A lot of people who get them wish they hadn't once they grow up.
Since tats are not for everyone, having them limits the number of men who might be interested in her. After all, I can imagine a woman getting rejected on the basis of NOT having any tats.
I would reject a woman with anything more than a small tat on her ankle. But even then, I'd have a lower opinion of her and question her common sense, taste, and self esteem.
Most Helpful Opinions
I think you'd get tired of looking at the same ink all the time. I know, as I have two tattoos, and I wish, wish, wish they had disappearing ink, as I'm so tired of looking at the tattoos on my arms. Worse, are the constant rude comments about Playboy all the time.
Personally I absolutely loath and hate all tattoos whether they're on males or females.
I'm fine with it. It looks good to me as long as it's not 100% coverage or too large.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
57Opinion
- u
I have never seen a girl who became MORE attractive because she had a tattoo.
I would be okay with it, as long as it was not overdone, just something subtle not something massive that detracts from her thigh area. More complimentary and unique.
Definitely hate the leg tattoos. I don't know if it's necessarily trashy. But I hate it regardless.
I like them, just as long as they're not poorly done or otherwise racist, morbid or sexual in nature.
Kind of neutral on them.
It really depends on the tattoo.
Some just seem meaningless, while others are a work of art.
Must be that beauty is in the eye of the beholder thing.Please don't. That's the prototypical look of our Hamburg harbor hookers.
I don't like tattoos at all.
(Even though a few of these are pretty!)I personally don't like tattoos on women. I think it takes away from her natural beauty.
The Roses and the bow is used up. But the rest is fine.
They aren't my style. A tiny tattoo on shoulder or arm would be okay for me, but I'm not into anything more than that.
What kind of person burns money on meaningless tattoos? I usually stop at that point when it comes to considering the tattoos.
I like them, but it all depends upon if they're well done and what they're about. If it's an ex's name, I'm out.
I can accept one or two of the smaller ones. The larger ones is a Hell No!
Trashy and a turn off any where. Not into it at all. Just my opinion.
Depends what it is and how it looks on her leg. But I wouldn't object to it.
Tattoos as a whole are not my thing. But I honestly tell somebody if it looks good on him/her or not.
Not really my style but it wouldn't stop me from dating a girl.
To be honest not really my thing but its not for me its for them to do what they like with there bodies and i respect that,, I like small if i had to choose..
All tattoos are trashy on people and show their bad judgement.
The are OK, but I have a mild preference for no tattoos.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!