What's worse out of these?

[Anonymous]

1.) A man with very hairy chest, abdomen, legs and thighs.

2.) A woman with natural hairy legs and fuzzy arms.

The man's case is worse and more repulsive

The woman's case is worse and more repulsive

Both are equally disgusting and repulsive

Both are absolutely ok and fine

[molonski2]

Oh the female example for sure..
Nothing wrong with a hairy man's chest , it's as it should be , hairless is unmasculine.

[Anonymous]

Both is repulsive, but I don't care about men, so I voted B... it looks worse on women.

[Opinion Owner]

Thanks for MHO

[AI Opinion]

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder! Both situations are natural and depend on personal preference. Some might find hairy chests or legs attractive, while others might not. It's all about personal taste and feeling comfortable and confident in your own skin. 😊 Embrace whatever feels right for you!

[FunkyMonkee]

As with pussy, I would PREFER that she shaves her legs, especially if she intends to wear pantyhose! But, if she doesn't want to, that's fine.