Hooters Is a Family Friendly Restaurant (Said No One Ever) (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
120Opinion
I don’t see a problem. If you want to be a hooters girl you already know what you’re in for. You’ll be wearing tight shirts to show off your tits (literally why it’s called fucking “hooters”), shorts that pretty much aren’t any different than the last, and people looking at you. If you don’t like it don’t eat there to support it or work at a shitty Applebees or something. My fiancé (Who’s Bi) at the time took me to Hooters and honestly I’m not fond of the place and the meal sucked. It’s literally a place for people to stare at the waitresses.
I don't think this restaurant if for a family ever. I would never allow my boy to go to this place, and even though I'm not a lesbian I would not go with my friends not to disrespect him.
I think that if girls are there and they are making them wear something they don't like, and they had another uniform, if this one makes them feel disrespected, they should change the uniform or compensate the girls very well and let them go with dignity
I went on e cause I was hangry and it was close by. I fkn hated it. They threw their boobs and bodies in my face and my dad's face. My dad's old, they could have given him a heart attack.
Also I don't wanna be eating with your nasty ass chest fat near my face.
I obviously was uncomfortable with them and all it did was bring more to the table. I was pissed.
God, does this "issue" deserve my attention?
They work at a restaurant whose niche is having skimpily-dressed waitresses, and they're upset for a change in shorts? I doubt it makes a difference, and if it's that big of a deal there are similar places to work at so just quit. Women already wear cloths in which their ass and tits are falling out so I'm confused why they care.
That radical a change in uniform, accompanied by the phrase "they can find employment elsewhere" is textbook Constructive Dismissal - the creation of an environment where the employee is being treated so badly that they resign having done nothing to warrant dismissal according to the original contract of employment they entered into when starting work.
There are many legal precedent cases on file with extremely large compensation awards made.
I think that dismissal would work well if there were only a few outliers in the company or at Hooters in small towns where jobs are scarce, but you're talking about an all female staff across the country who are essentially being forced to wear this vs male company heads who have made it quite clear, they are objectifying women without legally saying that. I definitely think had this gone further, the staff would have had a case UNLESS there is some fine fine print somewhere that they've signed on contract where they agree to where whatever.
It's blatant sexual harassment in the workplace. I'm not sure how the company gets away with it
I think hooters is fine, I’ve been there before with family. It’s just the creepy male ceo, the hooters girls are put up to strict standards. They can’t wear certain makeup, can’t do there makeup a certain way, can’t be a certain weight, heaven forbid you gain weight you risk getting fired, you have to always have perfectly manicured nails, etc etc
It's not just a creepy ceo, this is a byproduct of the creeps who this business is designed to cater to.
Bruh, who do you think made the business model?
Who do you think made the extreme rules to work at hooters
I think I was only in there once.
The food was mediocre at best.
The girls were not all that great that would of made me want to come back.
And it wasn't like you would of ever hooked up with one of them, kind of like being in a bad strip club where they don't take anything off.
I've been to one after hearing the food was actually good. I heart their fries especially were "legendary". So i did go there, for the food. it was decent but i could have gotten better at buffalo wild wings and the curly fries from arby's are better by the way!
I think the option is good, at the end of the day it’s a business like any other and they are trying to make the waitresses more like bottle girls. It’s a superficial business I might add just like modeling so I find it odd girls will try to sue, even tho it may not feel fair it’s just that level of superficiality which the public does buy into or they wouldn’t be up and running. Forcing women to wear a thong to keep there job is wrong and a bad way of going about changing uniforms obviously.
I worked at Hooters years ago. I was always aware if there was a group of guys sitting together or if there was a family together. I treated one group a lot different than the others. That is part of being a waitress. You have to know your customers/clients. It is certainly not a strip club, but can be a place for single guys to have a good time, or it can be a place for a family to have a meal. Just my opinion having worked there.
I'm all for the employees being empowered to make decisions they feel is best for themselves. As long as they're not enslaved by their employers and have the option to work there or find another job or career, I don't see the wrong in this.
I will still go to Hooters and tip them appropriately for their service and hard work, and they do indeed work their asses off.
with all the dangerous illegal work that men are forced to do in order to earn a living, I have to tell you this doesn't register much on my concern meter. I understand women being outraged and I don't blame them really, but the truth is that the consequences of doing what the company originally wanted them to do would not have killed anybody.
besides that, there are plenty of restaurants that are begging for help. Nobody is forcing them to work there. I never was inside one but maybe I think the waitressses get good tips?
@exitseven exactly - although I don't think tips are all that good in any restaurant, or if they are, the restaurant steals them.
I never worked in a restaurant but I would not doubt it.
If you liked Hooters, you will love "Twin Peaks", a rising competitor. One has to love the "skimpy lumberjack" uniform:
https://twinpeaksrestaurant.com/
Jesus! Is this even legal?
@lilyanony1 It is, no matter how silly.
Fuck Hooters. You might as well go to the strip club with the buffet and pay bitches to make you sexually frustrated if you are gonna go to Hooters to eat. I mean if you got to fuck a bitch with your meal it would actually make sense but these whores trying to act like they like you to get a big tip is so played out and worthless since you are just gonna leave there with nothing.
What's wrong with it? It's not like the girls run around naked and their tits and pussy in your face. Except for their belly, arms and head, and maybe some cleavage, they're completely covered! There's a place near here called, Studebaker's where the girls wear short mini skirts and walk around ON the bar and tables so you CAN look up their skirts! I've never been there so, I have no idea if they also wear tights and/or panties.
To be fair, I think they were trying to rebrand themselves as family friendly for a little while there. I agree with you though; it didn't work. The new uniforms are meant to appeal to Millennial Men's love of butts. I guess we'll see if the sales pick up
Pretty tame compared to Michigan. On business and after hours they took me to a strip club. The girls were topless and bottomless and some posed like they were going for a Gyno. exam. I go so embarrassed I went back to the car and waited as the guys had lap dances. Not my kind of entertainment.
Actually, it is. I briefly worked at a Hooters restaurant long ago. There were kids there and they loved the food. As long as nobody gives anybody malicious ideas, it can be a "family friendly" environment.
I’m laughing imagining all the men walking around with their butt out xD and just casually having conversations by the water cooler. xD leaning over a desk. “Oh hey Bob, how’d that thing with your yard go?” “Oh you know dale, fucking teenagers think they’re funny whistling at me just because I didn’t have time to change from my office shorts to now the lawn..”
Funnily enough, a few men sued Hooters (they settled out of court) arguing that legally, the company was discriminating against them by refusing to hire men (Hooters has since only agreed to hire men in support positions), but part of Hooters campaign against this was dressing up beefy men in their uniform and blonde wigs and basically saying, "no one wants to see this, stay out of our business Washington."
Well it’s true. Probably less than 1% of anyone willing to give them business would want to see it.
Personally I think the old design at least looked cuter.
The new one looks like someone in a high position of hooters branding and marketing team just has an annoying fetish they wanted to push on everyone else.
Old design reminds me of car wash charity hype clothing. at least it feels kind of themed. Though I’ve never eaten at their restaurant in my entire life sooooooooooo.. no ones ever bragged about their food enough for me to ever try it.
I agree. The old ones' got a definite car wash cheerleaders for charity vibe. The new one just looks awkward like a high waisted panty but I'm not a guy so whatever appeals to some old horny dudes that think the waitresses are actually flirting with them, then I guess.
Old dudes, drunk dudes, desperate dudes, shady dudes..
And a few normal dudes who have some kind of a kink. For that exact colored underwear.
Because hats basically what it looks like, is underwear.
I had friends who worked for hooters, and they were good looking. You don't even have to be 9/10 material, 7/10+ it always feels like.
Food is just okay but they have menu items consistently change and some that you just wouldn't find at many restaurants like cuban sandwiches, so that's another reason why they had been around for so long.
The dress code adaptation did go a bit far, it's not like they were struggling for business.