Are girls more attracted to action and chemistry than they are attracted to superficial aesthetics?

reixun

When people say "men are more attracted to women than women are attracted to men": What they're talking about is superficial attraction.

Women have a sexuality that's way deeper and more complex than male attraction. I've found this out recently that I want to know if you ladies feel the same about:

Male aesthetics do nothing for me as a stand alone.
Are girls more attracted to action and chemistry than they are attracted to superficial aesthetics?


^^ That doesn't make me feel anything. Nothing. Zilch. You know why? I'm attracted to action, I like boys to *do* things. Preferably rough, naughty things to me. Not just stand there and look pretty which is what girls do.
Are girls more attracted to action and chemistry than they are attracted to superficial aesthetics?

Guys would look at a pic like this ^^ or an equivalent sexy pic of a stranger and they would feel *something*. They can just look at a girl and be sexually aroused.

I need him to *do* something and be someone that I like to be aroused (including hot celebs that I've developed crushes on). I have gotten turned on by imagining my crush doing construction, like hammering a nail into some wood in a short sleeves shirt (biceps rippling hnng). I have NOT gotten turned on by a random muscular guy on the internet with his shirt off like this:

Are girls more attracted to action and chemistry than they are attracted to superficial aesthetics?


Yep, I agree :*
No, I disagree :/
Have a dick? here you click ;)
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Are girls more attracted to action and chemistry than they are attracted to superficial aesthetics?
34 Opinion