Well men have the traditional strength advantage so I feel like it'd be more balanced
You don't think a guy would stand a chance at all? I mean, he'd probably be stronger for one thing. I get it, the testicles are very weak, but do you really think it gives girls that much of an advantage?
Definitely does because that's all they'd do because that's any guys weakness
I thought guys were supposed to be the stronger sex, yet you're admitting that they aren't. I'm surprised to hear a guy so willing to acknowledge it.
Fights don't let you punch people in the balls lmao. . .
Fights with no rules do. Imagine a girl fighting a guy that's not in a competition with rules. There's no reason for her to avoid attacking his balls, right?
Yeah thats called a cheapshot and is looked down upon. . . Whoever gets the first hit wins basically. If the dude punches her first in the head then its over too
That's my point. You said that it wouldn't be an even match to the original question because a punch in the balls would finish him, but now you're saying that a guy could punch her first in the head and win. So apparently it would be an even fight after all. I don't see why either is a cheap shot anyway. Testicles are a part of the male body just like a head.
So would you be fine with a guy pulling your hair and possibly removing it from your head?
In a fight with no rules, then anything goes, though the original question was about some kind of competition that would presumably have some rules. I don't think hair pulling for either gender would be allowed. Sorry if it sounds like I'm being rude. I'm just surprised at your answer about groin strikes tipping the advantage to girls by so much.
Some rules as in no groin hits exactly. If you want some rules then you can't only have rules for guys lmao
Fair point. Would you be afraid to fight a girl if groin strikes were allowed?
I mean the rule would be uniform groin strikes, I never said it was explicitly for male groin strikes only. It would be even on the rules
Thats already a rule in most fights, no grojn strike from either gender.
Yes, that's true about that rule banning groin strikes nearly always existing, but the point of the question is to think about what might happen if that rule didn't exist.
Was replying to the other person, but if that rule didn't exist it would change very little since in order to kick/hit there you have to put yourself at risk of getting knocked out
Ok. Your original answer made it sound like you think girls would always win in such a situation. I'm confident that I would have a good chance of winning in such a situation.
I don't know, guys get a 5 minute break in MMA fights if they take one to the cup. And most guys who've answered have said it would be unfair. To me that signifies that guys are sort of scared to fight women with those rules because they would lose a lot
So you think women are stronger than men?
I mean maybe not physically but its pretty clear they have a chance in a fight and have their own advantages
Men are stronger, way stronger. Do we have a chance? Yes. A dumb guy might keep his groin open, or his head, or his throat. A professional wouldn't.
But a professional female fighter would also know how to place those strikes more effectively I feel like it would offer girls a chance. same weight class and things obviously
Just like any other sport, if your take away the division between men and women, it would be the same as eliminating the women.
I mean agree too disagree I suppose
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Maybe I feel like boys would still have an edge
The only opinion from guys was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!