So one day you wake up and it's all Women and about Women so what would you do if you find out it's a women's World đđ.
Men exist lol but like in a way how women feell being it a man's world priority wise.
Men are busy "running the world" because we want women to recognise our efforts and adore us. So in a roundabout way, women DO run the world THROUGH men's efforts. We operate the machinery and fight the wars all in the hopes that we'll be loved and accepted by women in return.
So in this hypothetical scenario of yours, I'm not sure if those "women in charge" would voluntarily operate the machinery of civilisation that men have thus far operated largely without quibble. Nobody seeks a position of absolute power in the hopes of being given *more* busywork to do. So I think women would just delegate even more work to the men, and take a larger cut of the profits from those labours. I mean, if you literally run the world, why wouldn't you just outsource everything menial or unpleasant to the zero-summers of society? Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
But thankfully our society is actually more or less egalitarian, it's only "patriarchal" in the sense that we pay lip service to some hold-overs from older traditions. But we don't live as traditional patriarchal tribes OR traditional matriarchal tribes.
Men and women are DIFFERENT that's for damn sure, but on aggregate we're all more or less in the same boat. We just have different motivations for the gender-specific proclivities that managed to endure years of cultural pruning and modernisation.
Some parts of our nature are inalienable, irrespective of cultural influences or pressure to conform. Men will continue to fight the wars and operate the heavy machinery and build the skyscrapers, because it's an inalienable desire for men to be deemed "worthy" not just by women, but by their own male peers, with whom it's necessary to coexist non-violently, and perhaps even amicably. And women will continue to LET the men fight the wars and operate the machinery and build the buildings, because it's an inalienable desire for women to be deemed "desirable"; and thus capable of animating men into action. (Hence the Jungian conception of woman as the 'anima', as in, "that which animates men into productive action").
women are already a priority in my life... and I have zero regrets about that, no complains...
but in my case... it happens to be that, as much as I give... they like to return even more
and for the MOST part... where I've lived and how I've grown up, all women around me have not been subjugated to men's whim... and men do not actually have a collective of oppressive behaviors to impose based on genders, so I really don't see things that way, and I repeat, for the most part it has not been like that.
so, what would I do? just the same I've done all my life, to be myself.
Men would come out ahead because women tend to destroy each other. Teams of women always break down in my experience. They will passive-aggressively attach each other and tear each other down.
Guys are mostly chill, except for the defective few. Women hold lifelong grudges over nonsense except for a few.
The sad fact of our world is that we women are the ones that are mean to women, hold ourselves back, judge each other. Then we are crazy enough to blame men for it.
Too much honesty here lol I don't have a response đ
@blondfrog It's not about individual strength, it's about individual aptitude and vocation. Women are more drawn to people while men are drawn to things. That is, women usually pursue soft skills while men do the trades, building, designing, maintaining, etc.
Agree. Men are leaders and groups need a leader and several followers. Thatâs why men control relationships. We are a gynocentric patriarchy. This means men take on the role of being dominate as they are best suited for in the patriarchy party then the gynocentric means women are at the middle of nearly everything. We value them and protect them because their women.
I don't know what ide do if women ruled the world but I can say this⊠there are not and have never been a true matriarchy.
I agree. I noticed it since the childhood that male friendships are STRONGER. I am masculine by nature that's why I struggled with females and their pettiness, jealousy and insecurity. No matter how nice you're to them, they'll STILL BE JEALOUS and will try to tear you down. They hate and hold grudges over MINOR ISSUES.
When men fight, the fight lasts exactly as long as it needs to in order to be decided; when women fight, it lasts a lifetime.
How did you become so grounded in reality? While I enjoy your opinions, the only problem that I have is that you are coming up male in the analyzers.
@A_Bell
Once again being based and dropping truth-nukes over here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqNx_og_uk
@DeltaCharlieEcho True dat.
I will do the same things I do, only that in that case, I could show more my overprotectiveness towards the men I love and care about. I could feel free from the overprotectiveness of my family, but we could care more about my brother's safety. And in that case for real would see men both as poor and uncareless victims, but at the same time as protesters and nagging about everything even though we want to comply to their wishes.
Lol đ it would be a women's World but men won't become feminine.
What being poor has to do with it?
So you agree that women nag even when men try to comply to wishes.
And you would do the same things that men did even if you had the world for yourself?
Kudos on the thinking part though made this conversation interesting
Opinion
74Opinion
The only way it becomes a womens' world is if society collapses in a highly particular way that doesn't enable as much as it forces women to take the lead (I'm assuming most men die off or something).
It's only natural that men end up running everything.
The only way it became a womanâs world was by creating conditions that mandated women be given opportunities they werenât qualified for or capable of.
I would hitch a ride to MARS with Elon Musk. LOL
It's a women's World they would have even claimed Mars bc it was believed men are from Mars so only sense is to conquer it first
Ha Ha Ha I forgot about that little bit of wisdom.
You can take refuge at Venus apparently it's empty now đđđ
Well, I live in the West. So it IS a woman's world. What I do is I just purposely act like a little boy. That way I won't seem threatening. Women tend to have more compassion for children than they do for adult men. Also, they get along with gay men better than straight men, so... That's why I try to play up my femininity as much as possible.
by the way, this isn't necessarily how I WANT to be. But it's a survival instinct. You have to do what you gotta do to get along in society.
That's one way to deal with it
I'd go right back to bed and try to wake up from that confusing nightmare. Men are so much less complicated and straight forward and I love that about them.
What a darling. We don't need feminism, just love.
@Xoirwinkan â€
@45fstraight. Very well said.
It kind of already is.
No fault divorce has lead to more of them happening for God knows what and women are the ones who initiate them more often, are more likely to win custody no matter her mental state and more likely to gain alimony/child support payments from the husband.
The Duluth Model teaches police to assume the man is the perpetrator in any domestic violence situation.
Court cases like Hermesmann v Seyer allows adult women to get child support from a man of any age even if she had sex with him when he was a minor.
Given how vaguely the FBI defines rape, women are a lot more likely to get away with rape based on a loophole.
Movements like Metoo have made false accusations of sexual assault easier to make than ever and that still isn't enough for those who support it because they want due process to be completely abolished for those cases.
If it gets any more like a woman's world, fuck that I'd rather live in the woods.
Wake up, grab my boys, head to the boys-only gym for a workout. After, go catch some mani-pedis, and maybe go home and chat about life while we change outfits one more time, before heading to the bar for guys night and see what ladies want to buy us drinks.
The real men will always be the same no matter who runs the world...
They will do the same duties as theredoing now... its just there is two thing which has a chance to increase in a men's nature at that time... either it would tolerance or it would be rage, and such thing will diffrentiate between good and bad.
Is this implying that men are treated as less intelligent and therefore don't get the same opportunities, employment or even basic education that women get? That the system is designed specifically to not let men easily access the resources they need to compete evenly with women in the world?
That men rarely get promoted to strategic or key positions in a workplace because of the general idea that men are "just better with people than women?"
Yeah that world would suck.
Death penalty for rapists, criminals and those who harm anyone physically like acid attack or burning someone alive. More the pain caused to the victim, more HARSH the torture before death.
$100,000 fine for those who harrass women, stalk them or leak their nudes online.
10 years jail for cheaters who hurt their partner.
Severe beating for a homewrecker irrespective of the gender.
So many bloody perverts, cheaters and rapists disliked.. world needs to get rid of people like you ugly males.
Ok bring it on đđđ
What do you mean by "woman's world"? As in societal expectations where flipped? I'd indulge the fuck out of being taken care of and not having any real responsibilities. It would be awesome (at least in the short run).
@MCheetah Yeah they do screwed up stuff their. Apparently they are training boys to be girls. Do you want serial killers? Because this is how you get serial killers.(seriously, so many serial killers where dressed up as girls by their mothers and shit like that, we are in for some very bad times because of these pycho's). But like I said, if the roles where just reversed I would kick back and relax, it would be fun for a little while to have no responsibilities and make others have to take care of me and to never be responsible for my own actions. Obviously I'm not serious, I would feel to much guilt at making others suffer but its a nice fantasy.
Write corny romantic comedies for a living and make billions.
Now here's a man of vision o like it
Of*.
Probably kill myself. That sounds like hell.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/UUwZ5Yo3Urg(This movie isn't even trying to be woke, by the way. It's satire.)
In some ways it is a man's world, and in some other (very significant) ways it is a woman's world, so the entire premise of this question is a bit suspect.
But regardless, it is not really possible for it to ever be a "woman's world" because virtually all of the critical roles that make life possible on this planet are, by necessity, filled by men.
I dont know. Starve from communism?
Maybe women would be able to create a collectivist society that isn't pure evil and actually works in an economic sense. I dont know.
"collectivist" and "economic sense" are mutually exclusive.
With todays maturity in women, I would go off grid and mind my own business. I would not support something I don't believe would work. It shouldn't take long before that society will fall apart.
I would treat it like a zombie apocalypse scenario. The last thing you'd want to do is get complacent and go to sleep with those women around.
Doing the same , living, working, minding my business and having self respect without bothering anyone
I don't know how that would work. Our societies infrastructure is 75% ran by men. Would women really step up for waste management?
I don't think thing would change much for me, I still retain my duties as a political and cultural servant of the people.