Guys, Do you all men consider a woman wearing a short dress or skirt that is thigh length sexual/above knee revealing, even if there is shorts under?

[Anonymous]

Okay I'm trying to figure out why do many people say short dresses and skirts are sexual and revealing. I want to get men's opinion, because something isn't right. Because whenever a woman dress modest she is still sexualized too. And something isn't making any sense.

If there is something wrong with it. Please comment down below of why you think something is wrong it.

And comment below if you don't think it's not inappropriate nor sexual.

Because as a woman myself. I don't wear short dresses and skirts to please others. I only do it for myself and I don't see nothing sexual about it.

Yes, it's sexual because it's short too much skin and it's not modest.

No, it's not sexual because there's nothing sexual about it.

Updates

+1 y

I don't understand how its sexy for a one to show some skin? I never thought wearing short outfits is sexual. It's cute but it's not sexual though. To me it isn't sexual.

[RavVid]

Good question.

I want to make a big point here. Our grand mothers, and possibly great grand mothers were wearing short skirts and bikinis. I don't think of my grandmother as being sexy.

I've researched this with the guys and it is agreed that bikinis on the beach is just situation ho-hum and is not particularly sexy. However we all agreed that a girl wearing a bikini in a super market is very erection worthy especially when she is reaching up to the top shelf.

Girls seem to think fishnet stockings are sexy but they aren't. Ho-hum isn't sexy.

Yesterday, the waitress serving me coffee was sexy. Her top didn't have cleavage and wasn't thin & clinging. It did however seem to drape down from two small points on her breasts. Phoar, I think she has big stout nipples, just the way I like them. Now that is sexy.

We all seem to like long sundresses a lot. I like skirts just above the knee. Maybe because my first rock hard was caused by such a skirt but I think it is more because it enhances a girl's shape and she can move without worrying about exposing her pussy. (not that I think that is a great concern today). The way a woman's body moves is sensual so I like clothes that enhance it

There is sensual and sexy. Sexy is exposing a lot of skin, sensual is more complex. Ho-hum is neither. Short skirts bikinis are pretty ho hum after three quarters of a century.

[Firesparks]

You can wear this n not be sexual unless that's the guy thinks about then a guy can think anything is sexual as public has sexualised girls period.. n it doesn't matter if panties , hose or nothing is worn underneath, it doesn't make it sexual in any way at all

[CountryWanderer]

Revealing her legs, yes, but that's not sexual

[cootjuhh]

its sexy because it show some skin. not sexual.