Ladies, would you ever be in a relationship with a man who's taken vacations to Colombia or (and) Thailand?

[Filthy_Immigrant]

not that I care as these 2 places are in my bucket list either way along with Amsterdam, Tokyo, Philippines, Cambodia and many others.

till then since women hate men who've had access to good and unlimited sex so much I always wondered if women would actually avoid these men like the plague; as they always claimed

I also have a cousin who've been to the places above numerous of times and I'm being honest when I say that I hate and envy his ass to the fullest.

Yes

No

Dont Care

[LazerBean]

I don't care. If I've already determined that a man is relationship material then I'm not worried that he's doing unsavory things if he goes to those places anyway.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

damn I'm surprise to hear this answer from you

[LazerBean]

I don't know why lol we love going to new and crazy places. I don't really see the appeal for Columbia, but I would go to Thailand for sure

[Filthy_Immigrant]

I think you miss the point. Colombia and Thailand are often visited by single men because of all the sex work these 2 places offer

[LazerBean]

I didn't miss the point. As I said in my initial response, a man who is marriage material will not be visiting those places for those reasons so it does not matter.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

in that case you really didn't answer the question

[LazerBean]

I did answer the question. "I don't care." If "I don't care", then the answer to your question "would you ever be in a relationship with a man who's taking vacations to Columbia or and Thailand" is yes.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

you read the headline and skipped the whole story

[LazerBean]

No, I read the entire thing. Nowhere in your post at all does it say that he is going there for sex tourism.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

what do you think I was referring to when I said "since women hate men who've had access to good and unlimited sex so much"?

[LazerBean]

That he has had access to unlimited sex. I'm just saying that it's irrelevant and not a worry to me. Saying that you have access to something, and saying that you use something that you have access to are two totally different statements. You have access to the books in your nearest library, but when is the last time you checked out a book?

[Filthy_Immigrant]

" Saying that you have access to something, and saying that you use something that you have access to are two totally different statements"

so you assume that men (especially bachelors) who've taken vacations to Colombia, Thailand or anywhere sex work is legal do not visit these places to take advantage of what these countries offer and market themselves as?

till then using your comparison, if books were illegal in most parts of the world and the folks who live in these places travel to were books were actually legal, dont you think they would at least read a page or two while visiting? especially if its again illegal and not allow in their home country?

[LazerBean]

It depends on the man. If it's a trashy man then I might assume they are partaking in trashy activities, but if he is a man who is marriage material then I wouldn't assume it.

My comparison was simply to point out that words have meanings, and if you meant to imply that the men you speak of are, as a fact, going for whore tourism then you should have chosen more appropriate wording. But even so your rebuttal doesn't work because many people go from places where weed is illegal and visit places where it is legal but do not try it out because they view it as gross and beneath them.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

"f it's a trashy man then I might assume they are partaking in trashy activities"

man you will be surprised how many men who are high class do beyond trashy activities. you should watch that movie American Psycho whenever you get a chance.

"many people go from places where weed is illegal and visit places where it is legal but do not try it out because they view it as gross and beneath them."

small percent of the population. most people who go on vacation to a country often visit that country to benefit off of what that country is marketting

[LazerBean]

If a person is partaking in trashy activities, then he is trashy. It doesn't matter how rich he is. Trash is trash. I've seen American psycho, the name literally says it's about a psycho. Psychos are deeply mentally ill people, meaning they are not normal and therefore are not an example of the norm.

And yes I totally agree with you that most people go on vacation to countries to benefit from what that country is marketing. But only trashy people will see prostitution as a benefit, and a non trashy person will not.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

yet despite being psycho he got away with everything he did and was never seen as "trashy" because he was rich, wore suits and ties, lived in an NY penthouse, was a health freak and worked as a stock broker.

and the fact that prostitution is consider "the oldest profession in history" and people are again visiting places where is still legal pretty much explain that not everybody thinks is "trashy"

[LazerBean]

Wrong, he got away with it because nobody knew he did it, since he kept it in secret. And why did he keep it in secret? Because those actions are socially unacceptable in the USA, and also will end you in prison.

I didn't say that everybody thinks it is trashy. No trashy person thinks that they are trashy. The amount of people who visit those countries is irrelevant because you would have to prove that the legal prostitution is the specific reason that they are visiting those countries for it to matter in your argument. I'm sure some men do visit Thailand because they are closeted homosexuals that are into cheap lady boys, but to say that that is the only reason anyone ever visits Thailand is laughable because there are many other things that the country has to offer.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

I guess you did not pay close attention to the movie. the real reason why nobody knew he did it and still remained in denial even when he testified it himself was because they all assumed that a rich man who looks innocent, wears suits and ties, lives in a penthouse with elite level grooming would never do such a thing.

if he was a hoodlum or a trailer park trash in the other hand they would of accused him of everything in no time. even if there were no evidence against him.

till then, yeah, I did say single bachelor men for a reason. if a man goes on a family trip to these place then when we can obviously assume he's not in it for the prostitution. however if he is single like I pointed out (trashy or not) and you still give him the benefit of a doubt then you are one gullible person

[LazerBean]

So what you're saying is that they didn't assume he did those things because those things are low class activities, and generally people who are high class don't participate in low class activities? So you are admitting that he was acting outside of the norm for his class. Glad you agreed with me!

If someone would want to go to a place as a family trip, then of course they would also go if they are single. Going to Thailand for vacation as a single man does not automatically make him a flaming f*****, no matter how much you want it to be so.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

nope, that is not how it when. during the shootout between the cops and the chopper the man literally takes out his phone and calls up his lawyer and confessed that he has "killed a lot of innocent people" which later on when he and his lawyer meet in person about that phone conversation his lawyer automatically dismisses it all when he claims he thought the call was a joke or a prank and that his first victim is actually alive residing on a business trip in Europe.

till then that is the main theme of the movie and the novel. that in America rich people who wear suits and ties can get away with anything because the average thinks exactly like you. that people who dont look trashy are not capable of doing trashy things in life.

anyways I'm not saying I disagree with you 100% about a single man going to Thailand and not even look at the prostitutes there. however considering the fact that Thailand markets itself as one of the best places on earth for horny single men then I dont think I can blame a woman for avoiding men who've visited Thailand, especially before their relationship while he was single.

just like me as a man I would trust dating a woman who's taken vacations to Miami by herself or with her bffs while single

[Filthy_Immigrant]

wouldn't trust*

[molonski2]

Hahaha.. vacations? What about living?
I guess that's rules me out , incredibly amusing..

[molonski2]

I'm not a fan of Columbian arses far too big , cuts down the field a bit. Don't like fat / sloppy the arse needs to be tight and sexy.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

if I was able to afford it I would move. man if you think Colombian asses are too big then wait till you see Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, Cuban and Brazilians

[molonski2]

Yeah man I got you , but I'm just not a big arse guy , I like tight , small and fit.. and gonna be tough to change now , I don't want some sloppy cnt where I can't tell if I'm " in " or not..
Tight

[Filthy_Immigrant]

I used to be one. but now as I've gotten older I prioritize shape and firmness more than size. today an ass like Alexis Fawx is more than enough for me

[molonski2]

Well bro , you've improved your standards , focus on a nice tight buttocks , that means the pussy is super tight also. And orgasim (s) inner and outer are far more intense..
It's important..

[Cidknee]

One night in Bangkok! 🕺💃🎵

[Filthy_Immigrant]

I would love to spend more than one night

[Cidknee]

So would I!

[DonaldDarko]

They don't care what the man did there, they only care that he had enough money to go.

[Sevenpointfive]

i knew a guy that went to bangkok all of the time.

[Jeff51]

Why not? Its good there too.

[Filthy_Immigrant]

a lot of men who visit these places go for more than just the view and hospitality