to be perfectly clear, i don’t believe in all that. it’s just that a bunch of misogynists on this site keep setting ridiculous standards for a “high value woman”, so i thought i’d turn it around on them.
640 opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. you don't have to believe in something for it to exist
a Ferrari would be more high value than a Toyota Camry, a mansion would be more high value than a wooden lodge
the whole point of what is considered "high value" is whom/what is deemed more desirable to their suitors/customers. it's not that hard to understand
more men are willing to date and marry Gal Gadot than they are Lizzo, therefore Gal Gadot is more high value than Lizzo.
likewise more women are willing to date and marry a man who is tall, strong, rich, hot famous as opposed to a man who is short, fat, ugly, broke, disabled
so no, "high value" is not sexist or misogynistic because men have their fair share of discrimination too involving plenty of factors that are outside of their control more so than women
do tell, what is so ridiculous about the standards men have for women that are outside of their control?
29 Reply- 1 y
@inhua all the items you list only have "high value" to sluts & whores. Gold diggers. Not women of value.
A woman of value - marriage material - wants a man who is decent & respectable. Who will contribute to the household more than just money. What value has his money if he has a rotten attitude or spends more time at work than he does with her / children - his money has no value.
This is why "high value" men oftentimes end up getting divorced and losing everything because they honestly wouldn't know a good woman if she landed on their lap. But sluts & whores and gold diggers that care only for money come in droves and rightfully rob the fool blind. - 1 y
@SakuraBlossoms87 throughout history women have instinctively sought out men who possess those qualities. there's no downside to having great genetics which she would want to pass onto her children and having lots of resource to ensure safety and security.
ideally most women would want the perfect man but the perfect man doesn't exist and given the choice between a man who's broke, got bad genetics but good morals and a man who's rich, got good genetics but questionable morals, most women would instinctively find the 2nd man more attractive than the 1st man - 1 y
@inhua - no, not throughout history women have "instinctively sought out men who possess those qualities". Cheap women do. Get it through your dimwitted head.
"Great genetics" are defined by your capabilities, intelligence and personality more than your money. Everyone with an intelligence level above minimal knows this.
And again you're an idiot
"most women would instinctively find the 2nd man more attractive than the 1st man" -- whores, sluts and gold diggers would find such attractive it is WHY celebrities, etc. GET SCAMMED idiot.
Decent women don't care for such things otherwise you dumbass 70% of today's world population would NOT EXIST because NOBODY WOULD REPRODUCE WITH THE "POOR GUY". Dumbass. - 1 y
@SakuraBlossoms87 if a person is overweight or obese its self inflicted and a sign of low quality because they lack discipline and inteligence. Not just because they are physically unattractive.
- 1 y
@SakuraBlossoms87
capabilities will always be prioritized over intelligence and personality. it doesn't matter how kind and smart a man when he's unable to do anything properly or competently
do you honestly expect anyone to believe good women would find a ugly broke guy more attractive than a hot rich guy just because he has better morals? fact of the matter is, morals can be changed more easily than genetics and lifestyle situations
actually nobody did reproduce with the poor guy. from a historical standpoint, humanity has far more female ancestors than male ancestors
women were procreating with kings, emperors and warlords. soldiers, merchants and peasants were lucky to have gotten any women. slaves and homeless men got nothing.
and birth control didn't exist back then either thus pregnancy was a high probability whenever a man and woman had sex which means the men who weren't having sex didn't reproduce and therefore had no descendants
decent women don't want ugly children nor do they want to live in a cardboard box and there's nothing wrong with that. there's no downsides to being more physically attractive or having more money
Most Helpful Opinions
You go, girl!
What a frickin' GREAT question!
15 Reply
860 opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. Considerate, kind, does not participate in extramarital sex, respected by his elders, good reputation, reliable, from a respectable family, and someone who you know will be a good father.
00 Reply
6.7K opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. Kind, honest, great sense of humour, romantic, outgoing, adventurous, open-minded.
12 Reply








What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
16Opinion
871 opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. One that can provide for a family, who is handy and can maintain the family resources and properties, one who can forward these skills to the kids, it's doesn't hurt if he is attractive but that will mean you will have greater competition for him. And he will have options. So a smart women find the right sweet spot there. Basically a man keeps problems away from the family of any kind.
00 Reply- 1 y
Fears and deeply loves God and the Lord Jesus Christ is a high vaule man.
Not this BS a high vaule man is handsome and has social status and money.
Plenty of evil people have lots of money in this world and they seriously suck as people.13 Reply- 1 y
Christian men may be the ideal "high value man" on paper but in practice, these aren't the men, women flock to in large numbers. there's a difference between the type of man, women should go after and the type of men, women actually do go after
historically speaking, religion didn't exist until a few thousand years ago and prior to that it's mostly been about survival traits that were deemed most valuable whether it be genetics to be passed onto the next generation or resources to maintain safety and security @inhua: Listen, man, I seriously don't give a damn what women want.
You think a man that attracts a bunch of 💩 heads that only have a pretty face and body going for themselves is something of value.
I personally don't see life like that nor give a damn about the heathen women.
I don't give a damn how pretty she is neither.- 1 y
I can agree with you that's what a "high value man" should be based on your definition but everyone has their own opinion of what a "high value man" is and then there's the type of men that has the statistics to back them up as a "high value man"
we may have our personal beliefs but when it comes to the dating market, women don't get to dictate to men what men should find attractive in women and likewise men can't do the same for women either. only they get to decide who they find attractive and the numbers prove it
- 1 y
In the broadest sense a high value man can aquire a lot of resources. The subjective part is what is needed to aquire those resources. Like fitness will probably be a proxy for getting resources in a place where your hunting or something so that will be valuable to society. In others it's having a lot of money to get resources. I also think it has nothing to do with the morals of someone so a person could be righteous but still not be considered high value and a despicable person could be.
00 Reply 643 opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. High value usually means rare.
So things that make a man more rare is height 6' +, strong (can bench press AT LEAST his own body weight), intelligent, no promiscuous past, good job with benefits, attractive face, no past of using drugs or heavy alcohol consumption, no kids from past relationships.
00 ReplyA high value man brings the following to the table
no baggage from previous relationships
does not participate in hookup culture
is respectful to women
seeks to bring out the best in the women in his life
is supportive
has his shit together
has good credit
has a good job/income
owns his own home
is honest00 ReplyHi value won't include money. If they ask your net worth or credit report, find a new lover, they are gold diggers, when money runs out they will dump you. I owned aa home at age 27 and never told dates because i didn't want to be wanted for my money.
00 ReplyThoughtful. Caring. Kind. Thinks before he talks/acts. Compassionate. Can have and carry on a conversation.
20 Replygood with communication, loyal, understanding, easy going
10 Reply1.1K opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. I have no idea. I just want a girl to be nice and cooperative. If that is a ridiculously high standard I'll stay single.
Looking forward to the high value man criteria.00 Reply2.8K opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. Somebody who is over 6 feet tall and went to a top college and has a 6 figure income. Six pack abs is a plus.
00 Reply- Anonymous(30-35)1 y
What exactly are these "ridiculous standards" set for high value women by "misogynists"? Honest question. Please be specific.
00 Reply - 1 y
Take your feminist BS and shove it. Men and women aren't the same and don't value the same things. Deal with it.
11 Reply 4K opinions shared on Guy's Behavior topic. She respects others and herself.
10 ReplyMoney, status, social skills, and good look.
00 ReplyMe... with absolutely no doubt
00 ReplyIntegrity
00 Reply- Anonymous(45 Plus)1 y
😆😆😆
00 Reply
Learn more
Most Helpful Opinions