That is not at all what they said. They just wish to broaden the definitions of infertility to allow for more people to become eligible for assisted reproduction procedures.
It sounds stupid because it was written by Daily Express (quoting no sources whatsoever by the way) which is a tabloid famous for bullshit clickbait articles, slander, blatant lies, right-wing extremism and conspiracy theories.
Yeah, that's exactly what they said. You have to be classified as disabled to get medical benefits like that. So they're going to consider single people or people who can't have kids as disabled. Even though it's not actually a disability.
This isn't clickbait, or slander, or lies. You don't fully comprehend what implications and precedent represent on a political level~
WHO only sets guidelines and standards, it won't and can't enforce them. Whether they consider this broadened definition of infertility to be a disability is irrelevant because whether something is a disability and what privileges come from that classification is entirely up to the health service in your country.
For example the ADA in the US already limits what kind of infertility they consider a disability, and in most states they don't even cover any infertility treatments by health insurance plans even for the legitimately "disabled infertile" couples to begin with. So it is hard to imagine they would follow WHO guidelines on something they already don't follow. Besides, the US doesn't even have universal health care, so what support (if any) you are eligible for would be decided on a regional level.
On the other hand, where I live infertility isn't considered any kind of disability but we cover infertility treatments by insurance by default because of universal health care.
It's fine, nobody is going to take what they're saying into consideration, unless you have an abnormal mentality. I also, doubt ANY doctor will call me disabled because I'm single, actually I'm pretty sure many health professionals/experts will shake their heads at this.
Its entirely honest. The basest biological function of any sexually reproducing species is the production of offspring so if you never want children you are mentally defective. I'm an emotionless piece of shit and even I want to produce some offspring whether through a relationship or a sperm bank.
its terrible. if single people want to get a child they must find a suitable partner like nature intended it. to go to a facility as a single fertile person and ask for a baby is bullshit. it is not a matter a medical or health matter it is a social matter. the world HEALTH organization need to fucking not meddle in SOCIAL affairs. it is not called the world social organization. this organization is doing things outside of its scope and i seriously question their motives.
the more people that have diseases, the more funding they need, the only thing you shojdl be offended about is how money centric all these government organzations are. they think drug addiction and obesity are "diseases" too when they're really just choices.
This is also a choice, and no, I'm not just offended that they're greedy. I'm also offended they're greedy enough to trample on human decency, AND MAKE US PAY FOR IT.
Yes, I fucking said it. It is indecent to have the government involved in your sex life. Deal with it. Big Brother isn't supposed to see your dick pics
You aren't actually going to get any benefits or discounts. As long as you still work, you'll be paying taxes, and those taxes are going to go to paying for the benefits of you, and everyone else who wants to leach off the government and use being single as an excuse.
You're 15, so I don't expect you to understand how taxes and benefits work yet, but yeah
Just goes to show you how far the rot has gotten. I think they are starting to realize that they are loosing control. They don't realize the more the push, the more the prod and the more they insult, the more men who will exit stage left and never return. So much for "emotional intelligence" of the "farier" sex...
That is such baloney. If your single you haven't found the right one yet.
Maybe... they mean "disabled" because they think a majority of us single folks aren't even trying to find a partner. Which again is ridiculous because it's hard to find a match out there. It doesn't mean disabled... just find places to meet other people and you'll find someone 😊
I can't find it anywhere on W. H. O's website - if you can please link it. But, if it's true, then that's absurd. That's turning what is a misfortune or a personal choice into a disability. Hopefully they take it back...
well? im single. dont want to be single but im just so ugly blind wheelchair bound women run away from me. and yes im disabled. diabetes. hypertension. so i guess in my case the WHO is right
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
82Opinion
That is not at all what they said.
They just wish to broaden the definitions of infertility to allow for more people to become eligible for assisted reproduction procedures.
It sounds stupid because it was written by Daily Express (quoting no sources whatsoever by the way) which is a tabloid famous for bullshit clickbait articles, slander, blatant lies, right-wing extremism and conspiracy theories.
Yeah, that's exactly what they said. You have to be classified as disabled to get medical benefits like that. So they're going to consider single people or people who can't have kids as disabled. Even though it's not actually a disability.
This isn't clickbait, or slander, or lies. You don't fully comprehend what implications and precedent represent on a political level~
And they're going to increase your taxes to pay for any random idiot who wants to say "I'm single and I want kids, give me benefits for it"
WHO only sets guidelines and standards, it won't and can't enforce them.
Whether they consider this broadened definition of infertility to be a disability is irrelevant because whether something is a disability and what privileges come from that classification is entirely up to the health service in your country.
For example the ADA in the US already limits what kind of infertility they consider a disability, and in most states they don't even cover any infertility treatments by health insurance plans even for the legitimately "disabled infertile" couples to begin with.
So it is hard to imagine they would follow WHO guidelines on something they already don't follow.
Besides, the US doesn't even have universal health care, so what support (if any) you are eligible for would be decided on a regional level.
On the other hand, where I live infertility isn't considered any kind of disability but we cover infertility treatments by insurance by default because of universal health care.
It's fine, nobody is going to take what they're saying into consideration, unless you have an abnormal mentality. I also, doubt ANY doctor will call me disabled because I'm single, actually I'm pretty sure many health professionals/experts will shake their heads at this.
read the actual article. the headline is very misleading
@madhatters4 Lol, seeing the title, I didn't even bother read XD
It's really not misleading at all, madhatters4 just can't read it properly
So because I don't want kids, I am disabled? Great. Where are my benefits?
LOL, love it.
Lol.
Outstanding xD
read the actual article. the headline is very misleading
Its entirely honest. The basest biological function of any sexually reproducing species is the production of offspring so if you never want children you are mentally defective. I'm an emotionless piece of shit and even I want to produce some offspring whether through a relationship or a sperm bank.
its terrible. if single people want to get a child they must find a suitable partner like nature intended it. to go to a facility as a single fertile person and ask for a baby is bullshit. it is not a matter a medical or health matter it is a social matter. the world HEALTH organization need to fucking not meddle in SOCIAL affairs. it is not called the world social organization. this organization is doing things outside of its scope and i seriously question their motives.
Survival of the fittest? Natural process of evolution? What are those?
Yeah exactly.
Then I'm disabled I guess. Fuck kids. But I do want a boyfriend.
Same
Dang all those butthurt downvoters
@ikissedtheskyonce I know right 🙄 Can't fucking form an opinion on what YOU find important for yourself.
I'm not even sure why you got so many downvotes. Plenty of other people here have said the exact same thing.
@M_A_X I think I've made so bitchy little girls and little boys as enemies. Idc. My opinion.
the more people that have diseases, the more funding they need, the only thing you shojdl be offended about is how money centric all these government organzations are. they think drug addiction and obesity are "diseases" too when they're really just choices.
This is also a choice, and no, I'm not just offended that they're greedy. I'm also offended they're greedy enough to trample on human decency, AND MAKE US PAY FOR IT.
Yes, I fucking said it. It is indecent to have the government involved in your sex life. Deal with it. Big Brother isn't supposed to see your dick pics
Lol, if I get benefits like payment and discounts and a job then what the hell, I'm fine with being single!
You aren't actually going to get any benefits or discounts. As long as you still work, you'll be paying taxes, and those taxes are going to go to paying for the benefits of you, and everyone else who wants to leach off the government and use being single as an excuse.
You're 15, so I don't expect you to understand how taxes and benefits work yet, but yeah
Just goes to show you how far the rot has gotten. I think they are starting to realize that they are loosing control. They don't realize the more the push, the more the prod and the more they insult, the more men who will exit stage left and never return. So much for "emotional intelligence" of the "farier" sex...
read the actual article. the headline is very misleading
media0.giphy.com/media/MMQVILwO9Vv2/giphy.gif
I feel the same way.
I feel like the inability for me to find a girlfriend of any kind is a disability at this point.
I mean, isn't reproduction the main reason animals live?
That is such baloney. If your single you haven't found the right one yet.
Maybe... they mean "disabled" because they think a majority of us single folks aren't even trying to find a partner. Which again is ridiculous because it's hard to find a match out there. It doesn't mean disabled... just find places to meet other people and you'll find someone 😊
Well, at least now I'll be able to park on slots reserved to people with disabilities. I can even imagine the conversation:
Officer: Why did you park here?
Me: I'm single sir, haven't you heard? Now WHO considers me disabled!
interesting. so if i am "legally disabled" for being single, does that mean i can get disability? (joke)
This is for 1 purpose only, money! They want to broaden their market of individuals who will consider IVF.
And yes, I agree it's pretty lame.
What is ivf
@mits777 invetrofertilization... that's what the article was about.
Thnx didn't read article cuz I am on the move on mobile
@mits777 😎 gotcha
Survival of the Fittest has been over turned Idiocracy in 3.. 2... 1... https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/axjOyAW_700b.jpg
They said left-handed people are considered disabled, now being single/not wanting to have childred is a disability as well.
Im both. So what am I now? just an atom? lol
read the actual article. the headline is very misleading
I can't find it anywhere on W. H. O's website - if you can please link it. But, if it's true, then that's absurd. That's turning what is a misfortune or a personal choice into a disability. Hopefully they take it back...
well? im single. dont want to be single but im just so ugly blind wheelchair bound women run away from me. and yes im disabled. diabetes. hypertension. so i guess in my case the WHO is right
The only disability part I see in being single is them yanking tons of tax bucks out of my check barbecue I'm single. Hurts like hell.