Are women's lives worth more than men's lives?

[msc545]

[GuyAnswersGirls123]

My wife's life take priority above my own. Not a random woman though.

I kind of go by circumstance everywhere else.

If I see some guy in a wheelchair being beaten up and an MMA fighter of a woman being attacked on the other, I'll aim to stop fight with the wheelchair guy first since I think he's more likely to get hurt more if I don't stop it sooner.

[GuyAnswersGirls123]

As another example, if I see a man and woman drowning, and the woman is a trained swimmer and the man can't swim, again I will probably go for rescuing the man first. Because the woman can swim. She might be able to survive without my help. It's not gender governing my choices here.

But with my wife, I must die before she does if I can help it or else I have failed completely as a husband. I'm very traditional here.

[GuyAnswersGirls123]

Oh wait, I just thought of a scenario where I would definitely have a gender bias even for a complete stranger.

Stay two strangers roll into a train in a wheelchair, and I have a seat. And one is an elderly woman and another elderly man.

Regardless of their relative distance to me, I'm giving my chair to the elderly woman. But first I'm gonna exchange a look with the elderly man and we'll probably nod and understand each other because we're both old school and like the gentleman code.

[Flatmanlewis]

I liked your examples, particularly the last.

[GuyAnswersGirls123]

@Flatmanlewis Cheers! I like this way. Some might call sexism it only manifests in a way designed to aid women ever-so-slightly more than men. And I have no qualms if women want to adopt it too and aid men ever-so-slightly more than women. Whatever. I'm just gonna do my thing either way and I don't care what a feminist thinks about it. I'm still holding open her door and if she berates me about it, she's the jerk because she'll fail to notice I hold open doors even for guys standing a foot taller than me.

[Flatmanlewis]

Yeah, I kind of think the Las Vegas crowd is a skewed place to base their arguments from.

[NathanDavis]

depends on the context...

[OtterMan68]

no, but I can understand why a man would sacrifice himself to save a lady

[SolitarySolace]

Children are more worth saving than women

[OtterMan68]

@SolitarySolace but that was not in the question

[SolitarySolace]

https://youtu.be/SVlisg4TUhk?si=jl8IJakZJZU9wXA2

It’s definitely implied

[msc545]

Why ?

[msc545]

* I was asking Otterman why...

[SolitarySolace]

https://youtu.be/SVlisg4TUhk?si=6ZQAY-lVPtgTgNnl

[goaded]

Oh, look, an interview with young women out on a night out. They're bound to be prepared for a serious debate and not just looking for fun.

[LiamJHayden]

An argument can be made that fertile women can be if the survival of the species depends upon it, but otherwise no.

[SolitarySolace]

Women are only valuable because of children. Technically children are more valuable than women. If women can’t have kids they aren’t valuable. Modern women fail to understand this they think they’re special when they’re not.

[Charliefretz329]

In the USA 🇺🇸 they say so

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

No, their not

[exitseven]

no, it is about 50/50

[Kingofkings1992]

No, but their lives are easier