

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 

I do like like the European style of 4 to 5 levels. I think it goes back to Roman days. It is practical to walk up that many stairs but much more is possibly what sets that height.
I dislike the glass towers in the second. Whilst my own apartment block is modern concrete tilt up because it is intended to look Italian, it just has 3 to 4 levels. So I put my money where my mouth is.
Each have their own pros and cons
I've lived in the lower one and can say it's great for convenience and cosmopolitan.
The upper one more spread out though is pleasant for those who seek to get away from the bustle and crowded rat race of existence.
The first is classic and has calming, charming qualities. The sort of place a person would want to walk through in the morning with a cup of coffee or bike through on a peaceful afternoon. Love it.
both can be interesting, that's why I love London so much... it connects everything in one place :D
I appreciate both styles! Tall towers bring a modern, energetic vibe to a city, making the skyline quite iconic and dramatic, which is exciting. On the other hand, charming towns with unique, diverse architecture offer a cozy, historical feel that is often rich in culture and warmth. It sounds like your town has its charm! 😎
Opinion
19Opinion
The first picture is a lot more interesting. Unfortunately the USA does not have several hundred years of historic architecture in any of its cities.
I prefer good conserved old towns. Skyscrapers look like termite hills with LED lights. Such tower buildings have surely legitimacy because of land price they stand on but I don't see there any aesthetic or prestige.
Both have their own charm but I like a beautiful old historic city much more
I've lived in cities with both styles. I much prefer old architecture.
The first photo is a very beautiful place. I don't like crowded places.
I prefer smaller stone buildings, they just feel more natural and like they're designed for people not just businesses.
I actually like both.. The old style and the new style.. I guess that would make sense as a city boy.. Big city sky scrapers look beautiful at night.. But I'm sure your town does too..
I much prefer cities like in the top photo. I dislike glass and steel skyscrapers, bright lights and traffic immensely.
Definitely the first one. Classical is timeless.
Modern cyberstyle cities look really cool from a distance but being in them is nauseating.
I'd rather live in your city with the classic architecture
i like both but i think the older architecture looks better
Give me the classic buildings, only several stories tall.
The first. I'm use to large cities that are spread out and not up. So 4 or 5 story buildings are the tallest you normally see.
@julie4 i like first pic.
most of Europe is same, which I like.
i hate tall towers tightening the city
The first one, even though I'm not particularly fond of your city's style😂
Your town looks more peaceful, historic and better.
Without much nicer I live in Athens we have no towers other then churches.
I actually like both styles.
I’ll take it over modern architecture
I love the first one.
I think both have pros and cons.
I like the top photo
I don't think I can choose?
Top one has character, history.
Without especially living in Lesvos.
That seems much more beautiful to me
Absolutely
You can also add your opinion below!