Some parts were dead on.
2-3 was virtually the same on his scale, and people really don't separate them out that much. I think most people would consider the 1-3 on this scale a 1, and the 4 on this scale a 2. For the record I know a woman with a serious facial deformity whose face is otherwise decent with a great body, and she's probably a real 4, at least.
After spending a lot of time at the bottom end, he then starts lumping a lot together. I'd probably call most of his 5's 4s ... except a couple ... but then the 6's felt like a big jump - most of them were decently cute. and would probably be considered 7's if they have decent bodies. His 7's, some I'd have knocked to 6, others' I'd consider at least an 8 - third girl on the right in row '7' for instance.
His explanations of 9's and 10s is probably accurate. a 10 is a 9 who is your type. A 7 who is your type probably looks like an 8 or 9 to you.
You and Ninja need to get together and slap each other till you come to your senses.
That scale was hilarious to read. Somewhat accurate too =P. But, like these other guys have said, it all comes down to the guy. Some of those 5's, 6's, I would rate much higher than some of those 9's and 10's.
Generally, my "scale" puts girls into 3 categories:
"No" - I just am not attracted to them at all, sure we can be friends...but I don't want anything else.
"Sure" - I think they are good looking, and if they give me the chance we can see where things go.
"Hell yea" - These are very rare, but they are the ones that can make you stare and drool.
85% of the girls I see belong in the "sure" category, with maybe 10% being "no" and 5% being "hell yea". Honestly, most girls have a fair shot...and I hardly rate one over another, they all have their advantages and disadvantages.
Bwahahaha! This scale is hilarious, but I'd personally rearrange it a bit. The "9" with the glasses looks like an 8 to me and the 3rd 7 looks like a 5 to me, ect.
I'd say that I fall in the 7.5 range of the scale (for the most part it looks like the girls who are rated 8s on there are really just 7s with makeup on but whatever) then again rating goes down to personal opinion.
I think I'm in 7 or eight..:)
Opinion
27Opinion
I think most of 1-4 are really "1's" in my eyes. Most of them are pictures online that are fake and meant to be gross I don't know how a real girl could look like some of them.
I tend to think 3s or 4s even have some redeemable facial features. The girls in 5 to me are more like 3's or 4's. But the girls in the 6 or 7 range vary much between where I'd rate them. Some 5's and some 8s.
The 8s and 9s are pretty girls for the most part
I just think the scale is kind of ridiculous. But rating 1-10 is ridiculous anyway
No, the 1-10 scale is very subjective and I don't agree with the scale that is posted here. For example some of the girls in that pic that are rated 9 I would rate as 7s or 8s and one of the girls that is rated a 7 I would rate as a 9.
I've had friends show me women that they thought were 8s or 9s and I thought they were 7 at best. What I think is a solid 10 another guy might consider is an 8.
1-10 scale is used by guys but we all know it is a rough estimate of attractiveness and very subjective.
Yeah that scale is pretty similar to the one I use. I use the scale purely based upon looks however, it would be biased to include personality into the equation. That being said my 10 is a 9 who is a good dancer, I'm talking latin and ballroom styles not grinding(but that's hot too).
What the heck kind of scale is this? lol. It's not hard to do better than those "10s" and even some in the 6's probably do so.
If you were to take any guy's perspective, everything above a 4 is starting to roll the dice and place it on the sheet with your eyes closed. I mean, people think Snooki or the Kardashians are hot. That's like, a 4 to me, for being fake, plastic, and having very little inside their skin.
It's certainly a lol image, but I wouldn't take it seriously.
" Grading " someone's physical appearance is just plain ridiculous.
Some of the girls that are rated " 8 " on this scale are pretty plain in my opinion.
But we all have our own idea of " beauty ".
However, based on this scale, I'd give myself a 5. Oh well.
That being said, I don't have poor hygiene.
No I don't rate girls like that , also I am attracted to certain type of jaw line and cheek so girls that other boys consider 10 is not my type of thing.
I want a girl that is attractive '' enough'' and a good wise and fun personality.
may be guys who are ifrom 18 - 24 have a different opinion. All the best
everything up to the 3s are at best 1s
the 4s are 2s-3s
5s are 3s-4s
6s are a mix with 2 being very high 6s with one pushing a 7, one is a 4, and the others are 5s-6s
7s only has one that is a 7, the others are 5s-6s, one might even be a 4
8s has 6s-7s, one pushing 9, maybe 2 8s, one is questionably a 5/6
9s has 4 9s, one is a 6, the rest are 7s-8s
10s do exist just not without makeup
im an actual 7 so I'm as high as an 8 by the pictures of the girls or a 7-8 based on the description
Probably an 8 or a 9 here, lol.
Kidding aside, this should have been given more thought, so if a woman was rated below 5, does it mean she'll have difficulty find and attracting men who wouls fancy them?
Not exactly, there are a lot more factors, also anything below a 4 on that scale would be a negative number not a positive one, 10's do exist, and I wouldn't agree on all the placement of those pictures but it has a nice idea behind it.
If a 9 became a 1, due to very high levels of radiation, such as nuclear Holocaust etc..and they managed to survive, would they still be as attractive?
well, I never thought into the rating system that much.
and really, nobody likes to be turned into a number (thats not 10).
honestly, I prefer the 7 and 8's over the 9's in the pic, easily.
I wouldn't agree with that rating, a lot of girls were put in completely wrong numbers...but it's all so subjective.
Personally I never found a reason why to rate a girl 1-10, so I don't do it.
I never thought into the rating system like this, but it does have some good points, namely that every guy has their own opinions, but that it is generally agreed upon that women who take care of themselves score higher!
Where did u find the picture? I can't read it. The letters are too small. When i zoom it it blurs.
Base on that scale... I bumped up that's for sure.
A four, maybe a five at best.
I think I am 7. Cause one of my tooth is not that straight and aligned. Thanks for the question, it's interesting :)
I tried reading it but then I realized i didn't have a microscope with me.
The entire idea of rating is kind of silly to me. I have a type of girls I go for - slim, dark haired and tall - and if they have a decent face, they're great for me. Also, when I like a girl's personality, she becomes more attractive to me. If a girl is bitchy, I lose the attraction, no matter how hot she may be.
I don't actually rate girls. It's like, either I like her, or I don't. She is more attractive if she has long hair, nice face, long legs, she is less attractive if she is chubby, short or has short hair. But none of this scale ratings for me.
I've no idea how girls would rate me. I'm tall and I workout, which counts for something, but I don't think I'm anything special.
Their rating system differs from my I can tell you. I saw some girls on this scale in the wrong category. Girls in cat 6 for example need to be moved up. Others moved down. Otherwise accurate.
Most Helpful Opinions