Men, would you marry a woman who had an abortion?

[Anonymous]

Would you.

Yes

No

Undecided

Im a female (vote here females... duh)

Updates

+1 y

Poll

Updates

+1 y

Good opinions

[TylerKuykendall]

Depends on two things. Why did she have it? Was she raped or threatened with death by childbirth, or did she not want the baby? If she didn't want it, it'd then depend if she was remorseful about her choice; this happens to include if she couldn't necessarily afford the baby nor find someone to adopt the baby to, since it was still her decision to be sexually active (even if she used birth control and protection, neither of which are bulletproof) that got her in that scenario.

[TylerKuykendall]

I voted 'undecided'.

[JuanShisuko]

Well, marriage would be a distant thing, 'cause we'd have to have a relationship first.

However, I'm of the belief that any and every person should do as they please with their body, and that involves abortion. She could have had her reasons for going through with it, it was her choice, and she has all of the right to make that call.

[Goldie757]

...
img.picturequotes.com/.../...-it-there-quote-1.jpg
...

[dudeman]

thats a stupid saying. love is a very small part of making a relationship function.

[Goldie757]

@dudeman to a lot of people it's essential and a big part of a relationship for the long term.

[dudeman]

and thats why relationships are not lasting as long as they used to and why probably half of the people in your generation will never get married. love is great sure but if its the only thing you require for a relationship than thats just as silly as marrying a girl because she has big boobs.

[Chaza23]

@dudeman I agree that love is not enough to hold a relationship together but I don't think it's just a small part. Relationships do require trust, loyalty, support, communication, etc. But you wouldn't be willing to put that much effort into the relationship if you didn't truly love the person. People's expectations in a relationship are too high and effort they put in is too low. That's why they don't last.

[dudeman]

@Chaza23 i just think its silly to say you didn't truly love somebody because you dont want to be with them because of their past.

[Chaza23]

@dudeman you don't have to like your partners past but a person is not defined by their past. People change. Love is accepting that and loving the the person they are now.

[dudeman]

@Chaza23 well agree to disagree.

[dudeman]

@Chaza23 the person they are now is also their past. if you dont want to accept a women with such a thing then its fair to deny her your commitment.

[ObscuredBeyond]

Her motives, attitudes, and whether or not she regrets her actions would all be major deciding factors.

[TheSwedishGuy]

Yes, why wouldn't I? Seriously, I really don't get it. Why not?

[evenlift]

I would not marry anyone.

But, I am definitely in favour of legal abortion, and in most cases I think that abortion is moral.

[ObscuredBeyond]

Robbing another human being of choice is a morally acceptable choice? How is infanticide committed in the name of convenience moral?

[Chaza23]

@ObscuredBeyond trust me there is nothing convenient about it. I have experienced both child birth and an abortion. I kept my first child and aborted the second. Both were painful, mentally exhausting and took a while to recover physically. One left me with a beautiful child that I am now responsible for and the other left me with a horrible memory that will haunt me for the rest of my life.

[ObscuredBeyond]

@Chaza23 : I was referring to women who think it's worthwhile because their school told them remaining childless would be a path to a six figure income. Which then gets outsourced to South Korea, leaving them with only regrets and debts. Sacrifice to Moloch is a deal with the Devil. And he never runs out of ideas when screwing us over.

[evenlift]

@ObscuredBeyond Homicide is a violation of rights. And rights pertain only to an actual person, not a potential person, a person being a biologically independent human being.

[ObscuredBeyond]

The elderly and disabled are not "independent" by some definitions. So you will dehumanize them too? If cells are dividing, and the DNA is human, it's a living human being. Period.

[evenlift]

@ObscuredBeyond I said biologically independent.

The elderly and the disabled are therefore persons, though, like anyone else, they are not entitled to support.

[Maxemeister]

Sure! Actually, if they were too afraid, I'd let them have an abortion while with me

[Anonymous]

Don't want to get married, but her having had an abortion wouldn't bother me, actually I'd be happy that she was for abortion and also didn't change her mind about it after getting pregnant

[Chaza23]

Would you?
I have had an abortion. Any questions?

[browny-sy]

شو السبب ؟

[Chaza23]

@browny-sy could you translate that to English?

[browny-sy]

ah sorry ur name is Arabic i meant u got pregnant by mistake ?

[Chaza23]

@browny-sy oh I didn't know that. It's a nickname my boyfriend calls me. Yes, it wasn't planned.

[Asker]

Can the baby answer the questions instead?

[Chaza23]

Obviously not.

[dudeman]

no i wouldn't because it goes against my morals.

[Dred1614]

No. Unless it was a medically necessary abortion.

[Kylesar]

HEAVILY depends on the reasons

[Omar5881]

Depends on the reason and when did she abort

[QuestionMan]

No I wouldn't

[Noxifer626]

Yes, I would.