What do you think about FLR ( Female led relationships )? (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
55Opinion
I'm not a fan of it. I'm traditional and I believe that the man should lead. I do know some women though who are the leader of the relationship, I don't think too much of it.
I am myself not a leader, I would need a man to lead me.
I think I would want a woman who can be my equal. So why would mean we would lead together. I don’t mind being the leader and I can follow, but I prefer to be together on decisions. I don’t like super bossy for long periods of time so if she led she would need to do so compassionately and tactfully. So to be in a pure female led relationship, she would need to be a good leader, even so, I still think I like it best when we are a team.
It depends, If the two of you agree and are on the same page.
They are fairytales, just like peter pan.
Women dont date doormats.
People are vastly different. There is no "all women are like this" or "all men are like that".
Case and point
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_World_Kingdom
This was literally small county that was all about femdom. And people went there on their free will.
There are plenty dominant women who love submissive men.
Dude that OWK thing is about femdom sexual stuff
Here I'm talking about female led relationships
And any woman can dominate her man in bed ( if she is interested )
And the matriarchy, gynarchy, FLR, female led world all these stuff are pushed by these dominatrix and their slave men and femdom porn addicts
( they are taking sex outside the bedroom, taking sex outside the bedroom is not a good idea )
It was not just about sex. They had schools, cinema, courts. It was a small city. It goes to show that some people are into that. Both in bed and out of it.
People are different. There are submissive men and dominant women.
I think we all have them we just let them get on with it my SO is gone 4 day's a week but she has my food what i have to do where i need to go all planed out on the first night back it ok we do our bit and plod on with life most of the time.
terrible idea, the women will never be happy, and the men will never be happy
You know that dominant women and submissive men exist right?
Those women will never respect submissive men
They are dominant! They love submissive men.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 no, not really. real life isn't porn
You are right it isn't. Still there are indeed women who love submissive men.
You really think dominant women like dominant men? They want to lead, not to fight for power.
Let’s be honest. An LDR is branded as being “equal” but the woman is just keeping him around as a slave to treat however she wants. The guy is just there to live as a hostage and get sex occasionally, if she allows it.
Sadly this. The ladies interested in this would only be abusive and evil.
@Curmudgeon Right and it’s just an excuse for the guys to be a waste of space and lazy. Plus, these guys are dispensable but yet they think they’re warriors against “the patriarchy”
That said, I DO get the appeal. But men ARE NOT loved and cared for unconditionally.
And why do you think that's how it's going to be?
Not for me, but to each their own.
Are both happy? Yes? Then let them be. People are vastly different. There are very dominant women and very submissive men.
People have the right to live as they want.
I doubt a houseman would be as good as his job as a housewife. It sounds nice in theory but no, I don't want to lead and I don't want to be lead.
I think the same as about male led relationships - I find it strange. Why does a couple need a leader? They're partners.
A kingdom can't be led by 2 leaders
Same goes for family and relationships
Asker You are thinking about it the wrong way. Who is the leader? There is no leader!
They don't have two leaders they have zero.
Women Themselves admit that they want a man to lead and look up to
And leading doesn't mean abuse
You mean submissive women want that.
Asker, none of what you say is true or relevant.
I've heard plenty of times that opposites can attract. A submissive person will thrive being the follower and a dominant person will thrive being the leader. If they both thrive, it's a success.
Ridiculous, A Female led Relationship is allowed but A Male led Relationship is classed as an abusive Relationship.
By who?
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 By society and sometimes the law.
If he abuses her yes. If he doesn't then no.
Recipe for disaster. I’m definitely going to let the man take the lead. It just feels unnatural to me to be the one leading.
It can work if he is submissive and wants that. It can be really hard if they are not both really committed to it however.
I would not be surprised if I have one. I have been the money maker in most of my relationships
Depends on the couple.
One person will usually end up taking more of a dominant role. But not always.
It's important that both people fit into the relationship that they are in.
I don’t think they work out long-term. I definitely wouldn’t want one. Fuck that.
In theory they sound fine for some (not me!) but in practice no one, including the female in the relationship, will have much respect for the guy. That's just a fact of human nature.
Disgusting. As the man you're suppose to lead your woman and be the head of the relationship.
Is it one or the other? I would think any dominance would be bad for a relationship.