Guys, why does it seem like no romantic women exist anymore in society?

[MCheetah]

Kind of a "part two" to last week's question I asked. Between all the queer women (lesbians/dykes), and feminists, it seems like Western women do NOT like men anymore. They are also the ones pushing, promoting, and "benefitting" (if you can call it that) from Hookup Culture and cheap, pathetic, loose sex. And then get surprised when men with morals, dignity, or any semblance of self-respect don't want them once they get off the CC in their early to mid 30s, their look shave declined entirely, and are done playing games (all of this assuming they don't even have kids at this age).

Mostly a rhetorical question, but why are there no romantic quality, decent, caring women who want a relationship with a man left out there? Why are there nothing left but queer women and feminists? And why do some 'males' out there lack such dignity and self-respect that they'd cuck themselves to a female who openly admits she's into women? (That's beyond self-emasculating and pathetic.)

[LogicBomber]

Because generally women nowadays are entitled narcissistic spoiled children
they have the illusion of choice because of dating sites and the ability to easily get tons and tons of attention on the Internet by exposing themselves, So they don’t know how to be thankful for the person who actually cares for them

[ALewis30]

Because of social media, woke culture and SJW's

[RealMarek]

Why? Because the best, bravest, and most noble Western elites were quickly and senselessly slaughtered in World War 1. Without these men, there was nothing to put radical ideologies that were festering among the remaining elites in check. The balance between chaos and order was lost and the West got on the runaway train of libertinism. Having liberated ourselves from formalities and social conventions and led by an elite that is ever more decadent, we are increasingly captive to confusion and primal, animalistic behavior.

I fully understand how hook-up culture is detrimental to men (makes it much more difficult for most men to find relationships), Even though women who want to “hook-up” are able to find casual sex relatively easily, it is still detrimental for them because most of them desire commitment and it makes it more difficult for them to achieve this. Also, it is frustrating for women who do not want to “hook-up” to sort through guys who demand sex at the end of the first date, or follow up the date with a dick pick. There are many such cases.

There are romantic women who are also straight who want a caring relationship out there, even among women in their 20s. I know it’s more difficult to find than it used to be. You will find that as women age, a lot of the ones who fell for “bad boys” or made other mistakes when they were young begin to appreciate a stable, caring man.

[sunflower00]

I think there are plenty of romantic women and men left, but when you are constantly using social media and the internet you see the most extreme side of things that don’t reflect actual reality.


Like, I’m a feminist, I love my boyfriend, I’d consider myself very romantic and caring, along with most women I know

[Berethor]

Many men don't consider lesbian sex as real sex, so there is that.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardRapeFemaleOnFemale

[HighlyVolatile]

I think family values. If monogamy and things like marriage are to be cherished, then I think the ultimate point is for family and future children. Children especially are the practicality behind monogamy as I see it; it helps if both parents are committed to each other and raising their children. A lot of the waves of modern feminism -- but also MGTOW and so forth -- seem allergic to the notion of building a family and raising children.

[HighlyVolatile]

All my romantic ideals revolve around the notion of building and protecting my family. Take it away, call it old-fashioned, and I might as well just sleep with every woman I can and build up a lifetime of memories of flings and adventures with the widest variety of women.

[HighlyVolatile]

I'm actually of the odd and frequently contradictory mindset that monogamy -- and all the romance we've culturally associated with it -- might be the most harmonious and most natural state of being.

The way I picture it is that in our evolutionary history, we had to struggle so much to survive. Resources were scarce, and surviving another winter was harsh. Even though our sex drives generally aren't limited to one potential mate, there just aren't enough resources to go around for a man or woman to be having a bunch of mates. Childbirth was also dangerous with high mortality rates, and a pregnant woman was left quite vulnerable on her own.

So I think a man needed to protect his family just for the survival of the species in this natural condition, and the woman embraced his protection. Polygamy and promiscuity as I see it is human nature misfiring in more complex and luxurious environments from that which we naturally evolved against.

[HighlyVolatile]

But I'm also looking at psychology when I talk about being in harmony with nature because who genuinely seems more fulfilled in life? The man or woman who dies having been together for so many years with the love of their lives, building a family together, or the lifelong bachelor or bachelorette who never valued such things?

[KrakenAttackin]

I guess when they have been run through more times than a yellow light, they lose the "romance" drive.

[KlinkyCoder]

Well, at least I'd get some kind of experience. I can't be romantically attracted to someone who is not romantic, but sexually it is still open.

[exitseven]

They are out there but they are hard to find.

[Fuentes]

I'd say social media and feminism

[JesseJayNeak]

Hookup culture took over, that’s why