Religion of Science vs GODS Word who will win?

[Anonymous]

don't worry I already know the answer

[Wade8888]

Hey OP...

You've been told by both the unbelievers in God and the believers in God repeatedly that you just flat out don't know what you're talking about.

When are you going to give up this nonsense?

If the Bible was the "Word of God" then why hasn't it come to pass yet?

The entire New Testament fails the standard of True Prophecy which is outlined in the Torah and the Prophets. So why do you continue to believe this nonsense?

Where are your Hybrid Giant bones and hybrid Giant DNA? Don't show the skull bindings again, those are NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS WHO'S SKULLS WERE BOUND FROM THE TIME THEY WERE INFANTS BY THEIR INSANE PARENTS. Those are NOT giants and anybody who claims they are is being ridiculous and dishonest.

As for Free Will, none of you people on this thread understand enough real philosophy to understand the topic. Free will does not contradict physics, neither does physics contradict free will. For that matter, "real miracles" don't even contradict physics, even though that's commonly the definition pastors incorrectly give for a "miracle" the fact is God does not violate his own laws, and one law of God does not violate another law of God. Understand?

The Uncertainty Principle allows Physics and Free Will to co-exist. Both Einstein and Stephen Hawking were dead wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Jint5kjoy6I

[Wade8888]

In fact, I'd even say Dr. Kaku gets this slightly wrong.

the Uncertainty principle does not cause Free Will. In fact, quite the contrary, Free Will causes the Uncertainty Principle. That is, the Uncertainty Principle is the physical, tangible evidence that Free Will actually exists.

[Leavesbound]

Science isn't a religion, it's the opposite of religion. Science is rational thought. Religion is irrational thought. The two do not overlap and one cannot be used to describe the other.

[Asker]

science is a religion you must prove it

[Leavesbound]

No it is not. Religion is the organized belief in the supernatural. Science has no place for the supernatural and therefore is NOT a religion. Science is the study of things based on observation and evidence. Religion relies on the lack of evidence to succeed. Religion is the opposite of science and therefore both are mutually exclusive.

[Asker]

no science is a religious texts you must prove it

in your religious texts
it says the core of the earth is 4000 miles under ground

OK NOW PROVE IT
if you can't
then you have blind faith

and you are religious

IT'S THAT SIMPLE

[CountessSarah]

Ask. A. Coherent. Question.

The video is completely unrelated to the title.
It starts off with some clip that's making a point about... Free will. But it's making a really stupid one in my opinion. The guy seems to be talking about 'himself' and his brain as if they were separate entities when they're not.

Then it has an irrelevant Matrix clip.

Followed by bibble quotes that nobody cares about.

What the hell is being asked here?

Your posts and videos don't communicate a coherent message to the viewer. Even if you were, by some miracle, correct about something, you will never convince anyone until you start presenting a compelling argument. This isn't compelling, it's the ramblings of an idiot.

[Sweepthelegjonny]

You gotta remember, there’s a TON of brainwashed religious idiots on here. The asker probably won’t understand anything you just pointed out.

[CountessSarah]

@Sweepthelegjonny
I know. This one is particular has been at this for /years/.
But I'd like to help them at least communicate their ideas effective, no matter how wrong they are.

[Jennifertoubl]

Lol science isn't a religion 🤣

[Asker]

you have to prove that first

[Jennifertoubl]

Lol omfg muaaahahahaaah what? Religion is gods and holy shit and books and rules and shit rituals

Scientists work autonomously trying to discover the next big thing

It ain't even the same league it ain't even the same damn game yo

[Asker]

ok prove the core of the earth exist

:)

if not your religious texts
is nothing but a fairy tale
based off blind faith beliefs

[Jennifertoubl]

Lol ok... well I guess you gonna say the invisible man in the sky is the better option huh

[Asker]

yes cause there is evidence for his words

while the religion of fake science
is fairy tales

[Jennifertoubl]

Evidence for the invisible man in the sky's words? You must mean that book... what's the name... bible? I forget cuz I read so many books...

Anyway... science is not a religion... still

Period

[genericname85]

stop spreading the false information that science is a religion. it is a method to reliably gain knowledge. not a cult or religion. get your shit together man. they can't "win" against each other, cause they're doing opposite things.

[Asker]

prove the core of the earth exist
its in the science text book

if you can't prove it

THEN SCIENCE IS A RELIGION

[Asker]

blind faith atheist lol

[genericname85]

oh i remember i spoke to you before. the core of earth is a theory. not "science". you seem to be confused what science is, so please tell me what you think science is. define the word for me please.

[Asker]

science is a blind faith religious text book that can't be proven

[genericname85]

i mean it's very easy to proof that the earth must have a massive core but this isn't what is a massive detour from the meaning of science. so it's not what science is about at all.

[genericname85]

"science is a blind faith religious text book that can't be proven" you just defined religion, not science my dude.

science is "a method of procedure consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

[genericname85]

and just on a side note: here's the simple prof that the earth has a massive core. if it was hollow, the mass would be different meaning the earth orbit around the sun and the moons orbit around the earth would be different. if earth was lighter, we'd drift closer to the sun and burn and the moons orbit would be much further from earth and probably just leave earth orbit.

[genericname85]

astronomers figured that shit out way before we could observe and calculate with complex computer models. and the models we have get more and more pricese over the years. unlike religion. that just always stays as wrong as it was, when it was made up.

[jshm2]

How the hell do you come to such daft conclusions and dichotomies is beyond me.

You do the devils work, kiddo.

[Asker]

you are the one who believes in a false religion

[Anonymous]

Science is not a religion.

Yet another theist who is too stupid to think people can live without a religion.

[Asker]

Science is a religion you have to prove it

[Opinion Owner]

Science can be proved. Religion can't. That's another reason science is not a religion.

[Asker]

ok prove the core of the earth exist

if not your religious text book
is nothing but a fairy tale

cause your religious texts
says there is a core 4000 miles under the earth

OK NOW PROVE IT

[Opinion Owner]

go away you desperate sad lonely little man...

[Silas_153]

Science isn't a religion, it's a methodology. You do know that, don't you?

[Asker]

no science is a religious texts

[Silas_153]

Don't be ridiculous.

[Asker]

there is literally a book called science

IT'S A RELIGIOUS TEXTS
you must prove the book is
telling the truth

[Astarlessnightsky]

Whats religion of science?

[Asker]

science is a religion
its in a texts book
and filled with fairy tales
very easy to disprove science

[oddwaffle]

Which god? There are too many of them. Who cares?

[Wade8888]

You're missing th epoint. The concept of a Greatest Conceivable Being exists, therefore the Greatest Conceivable Being actually exists. Therefore God exists.

It doesn't matter that I can't and cdon't know perfect doctrine or perfect Theology, that doesn't change the fact than the actual "Greatest Conceivable Being" exists.

You're being intellecutally dishonest, and you know it. Which is a sad case to be in on your part, because you'll be guilty before this Everlasting GOD one day, since you know you're being dishonest and you "don't care".

[oddwaffle]

@Wade8888

Not really. There are a lot of gods. Not just one. You can't prove there is only one.

[Wade8888]

Yes I can prove there is only one God.

THE COMBINATION OF THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT PROVES THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD.

AND YES, YOU CAN PROVE JUST ABOUT ANYTHNIG USING LOGIC ALONE, WE DO IT ALL THE TIME IN SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS COURSES.

THE GREATEST CONCEIVABLE BEING IS GOD (BY DEFINITION)

THE FIRST CAUSE IS OBVIOUSLY THE GREATEST CONCEIVABLE BEING, THEREFORE GOD.

THERE IS ONLY ONE "THE FIRST CAUSE".

THEREFORE ONLY ONE GOD PROVEN

[Wade8888]

BY THE WAY, IN STRING THEORY, THERE IS ONLY ONE "THE FIRST CAUSE" OF THE ENTIRE 10^500TH UNIVERSES IN THE MULTIVERSE, AND THEY CALL THE FIRST CAUSE "INFINITY", WHICH IS THE SAME PROPERTIS AS GOD HIMSELF. WHICH IS IRONIC, BECAUSE STRING THEORY WAS ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED TO TRY TO PROVE THE UNIVERSE WAS SELF-ETERNAL, WHICH THEY NOW KNOW IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE. (BORG, GUTHE, VALANKEN, ET AL, MICHIO KAKU ET AL)

"THE MULTIVERSE DESCRIBED BY STRING THEORY IS SO PERFECT THAT THE ONLY WAY IT COULD COME INTO BEING IS IF IT WERE IN FACT CREATED BY A PRE-EXISTING INTELLIGENCE." - (DR. MICHIO KAKU, 2018, FACEBOOK)

[Silas_153]

@Wade8888 "The concept of a Greatest Conceivable Being exists, therefore the Greatest Conceivable Being actually exists. Therefore God exists."
This is laughably bad. Do you think reality is limited to what we, in our limited capacity, can possibly conceive?

[Silas_153]

@Wade8888 "AND YES, YOU CAN PROVE JUST ABOUT ANYTHNIG USING LOGIC ALONE, WE DO IT ALL THE TIME IN SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS COURSES"
You clearly don't understand how science works (or mathematics, for that matter). Science is the pursuit of knowledge via the testing of hypotheses about nature and how it works, via experimentation, validation, prediction and repeatability. It doesn't rest upon logic alone.

[oddwaffle]

@Wade8888

Hahaha You don't know anything about logic. You can prove something and there are a lot of things you can't prove. Some might get proven in the future and some will never get proven.

Here is the logic for you to think but you might no be able to. If 1 exist then why not 2? If there is a greatest then what happened to the 2nd place? If there is no 2nd place then how can you have 1st place? Without 1st place can there be a greatest?

[Anonymous]

Science.