Search Results: 200 years

Kind of a sequel to this question here. Things have been changed up a bit. Which one would you rather have, given these options?

You have a Genius Intellect with a 200 IQ and the potential to solve most non-personal problems in society, with a highly respectable (but not profitable) career, but will always undateable and seen as physically unattractive to everyone of the opposite or same sex (regardless of how you look in the mirror) and will never get married, and will die a virgin, no matter what.

You have a perfect-looking body that is seven inches taller the median height, naturally fit and powerful without exercise, naturally well-endowed (big boobs or dick), with perfect teeth, a 9.5 out of 10 flawless face that seems to stop aging after 25, and a 100 IQ, but will never be rich or wealthy and will never earn more than $43,000 USD a year. You'll always have to work a 9-to-5 job until retirement and can't marry/date anyone rich, either.

You have very wealthy and influential parents and have known wealth and extreme luxury your entire life and will never have to worry about being poor or finding work, but you are mentally (literally) retarded with an IQ of 70, have learning disabilities like Dyslexia or ADD, and are only median height with equal looks.

You reject all the above options, leaving this as the last and only choice left. You choose to be mediocre and all-around valueless to society (aka, average) with a male height of 5'10"/178 cm, or female height of 5'5"/165 cm, with 5 out of 10 looks, an average weight and body, subpar endowments (6" penis, or C-cup bust), with a 100 IQ, earning an average individual salary, with a spouse and two kids (one son and daughter), with a meaningless job and a ho-hum life in a small town somewhere. You will never be smart, never be attractive looking, and never be rich.

Gov. Gavin Newsom's Reparations Task Force received projections from a consulting panel that show California may need to pay over $200,000 per person to Black residents if the state wishes to make good on promises of reparations for past housing discrimination.

Newsom has aggressively pushed his plan to provide financial reparations to Black Californians whom he says must be financially compensated for decades of discrimination.

The California Reparations Task Force's five member economic consultant team reported that under the initiative, qualifying Black residents in the state could qualify for $223,200 per person.

The task force's consultant team drew its ballpark number by examining gaps in housing and speculating the approximate amount of wealth lost between 1933 and 1977. The state panel says that Black Californians lost $5,074 per year under previous housing policies.

"The $559 billion figure is in reference to a scope of work document presented to the California Reparations Task Force by its five member economic consultant team during our September public hearing in Los Angeles," the California Reparations Task Force clarified in a statement to Fox News Digital.

The group added, "According to the economic consultant team, the $559 billion figure represents the State of California’s ‘maximum liability’ for de jure homeownership discrimination 'if all 2,550,459 Black California residents who lived in the state in 2021 were descendants of the enslaved in the United States and had spent the entire time period from 1933 to 1977 in California (or were the legal heir of a person that did).'"

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-reparations-proposal-could-mean-223k-per-person-payments-black-residents?intcmp=tw_fnc