Search Results: what should i do

In 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was passed. It included Section 24220, which requires passenger motor vehicles to be manufactured with "advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology". I also assume it's intended to fight theft.

This goes into effect in 2027.

Drivers worry as federal surveillance technology becomes mandatory in new cars by 2027

And here's another article about it...

All New Cars Could Have Mandatory Surveillance Tech Unless Congress Stops This Mandate

Should this be required by law?

My view: Yes, it is fundamentally anti-women.

If the argument is that women need abortion to be equal to men, the implication is that women’s natural ability to become pregnant is a liability or a defect that must be neutralized before they can compete. That does not sound pro-woman. It sounds like measuring women entirely against a male standard and treating motherhood as an obstacle to success. True empowerment shouldn't require women to reject their own biological reality to fit into a system designed around men. Real respect for women should mean honoring women as women, not treating pregnancy and motherhood as problems that must be eliminated.

what do you think? Do you believe saying women need abortion in order to be equal to men is fundamentally anti-women?