Search Results: being a virgin

Kind of a sequel to this question here. Things have been changed up a bit. Which one would you rather have, given these options?

You have a Genius Intellect with a 200 IQ and the potential to solve most non-personal problems in society, with a highly respectable (but not profitable) career, but will always undateable and seen as physically unattractive to everyone of the opposite or same sex (regardless of how you look in the mirror) and will never get married, and will die a virgin, no matter what.

You have a perfect-looking body that is seven inches taller the median height, naturally fit and powerful without exercise, naturally well-endowed (big boobs or dick), with perfect teeth, a 9.5 out of 10 flawless face that seems to stop aging after 25, and a 100 IQ, but will never be rich or wealthy and will never earn more than $43,000 USD a year. You'll always have to work a 9-to-5 job until retirement and can't marry/date anyone rich, either.

You have very wealthy and influential parents and have known wealth and extreme luxury your entire life and will never have to worry about being poor or finding work, but you are mentally (literally) retarded with an IQ of 70, have learning disabilities like Dyslexia or ADD, and are only median height with equal looks.

You reject all the above options, leaving this as the last and only choice left. You choose to be mediocre and all-around valueless to society (aka, average) with a male height of 5'10"/178 cm, or female height of 5'5"/165 cm, with 5 out of 10 looks, an average weight and body, subpar endowments (6" penis, or C-cup bust), with a 100 IQ, earning an average individual salary, with a spouse and two kids (one son and daughter), with a meaningless job and a ho-hum life in a small town somewhere. You will never be smart, never be attractive looking, and never be rich.

Inspired by this random GAG question I came across here. It's a bit sloppy with the poll choices though, so I simplified it a bit.

1. Would you date a really amazing biological girl who looked like a guy/transwoman, or a biological guy who looked like a girl/low-effort transman? They have a 10 out of 10 personality and are everything you want in personality, but they look like the opposite gender to the point of coming off transgender (they're biologically "cis," however).

2. Would you date a great, awesome girl or guy who was 100+ pounds (45+ kg) overweight? They're at least 350 pounds; bare minimum, and are comfortable with their weight and who they are, physically. They have an 8 out of 10 personality. They're 80% of everything you could ever ask for in personality, and the missing 20% are more minor details.

3. Would you date a decent girl who was six inches taller than you, or a guy who was six inches shorter than you? They're also the same weight as you, but they have a pretty face. They have a 6 out of 10 personality and are the majority of everything you want in personality, on top of being super-attracted to you and want to jump your bones in bed. They're not ideal, but they're heavily attracted to you.

4. Or option D; die a virgin, having never even been hugged by the opposite gender before (or same gender, if you're into that.) Your social skills will be terrible, to the point you'll come off autistic or like you've got Asperger's. And the only thing worse than that will be your personal hygiene. You'll remain thirsty until the day you die and never know love, sex, or companionship.

WHICH ONE WOULD YOU RATHER DATE, IF THESE WERE YOUR ONLY OPTIONS?