Search Results: child abuse

I do imagine that in court, if the judge hears about one parent having slapped their child in the face, that will for sure hurt their case.

Sometimes I see the line of what is abuse vs punishment being blurred. As a child and throughout my teen years, I was slapped in the face thousands of times by my mother and my throat was grabbed once by my dad and brother. Although abuse from my dad came in the form of threatening and emotional abuse while with my mom, it was both. I remember when I was 12 years old, I heard my mom on the phone with my grandma bragging about how she'd slap both me and my older brother in the face.

I absolutely consider what she did to me abuse of a child, she no longer does it because I'm now significantly bigger than her and exponentially stronger, and I've also stood up to her on many occasions, not afraid to get in her face and yell far louder than she can, to her astonishment.

She still tries to emotionally control me, and screams at me when I confront her on the constant abuse she put me through, she just fake cries and when i tell someone else, she demands that I tell them it isn't true. Same as she did when a doctor asked me when I was in the hospital for lung infections, if my parents ever hit me and I told him that my mom regularly hits me and she demanded that I tell him it isn't true, but I refused.

My dad then told me I disgraced the family and myself. If a parent slaps her child in the face with more than enough force to cause bruising, do you consider that abuse of a child? Should that parent be arrested and charged for it?

Basically that it's a secret lair for the world's top elites to engage in Satanic ritual abuse using abducted children. Such conspiracy theories emerged after some guy connected with the Blegian government did such stuff with some prominent Western elites and was exposed for it in the late 90s.

Apparently there was some cover-up by the government and law enforcement until some quasi-coup happened and then that guy and several others were brought to justice, but much like the Epstein case, many "clients" never were exposed and/nor brought to justice. That castle started out as like a home for the royal family in Belgium in the 19th century before being sold to some elite aristocracy after WW2, and then parts of it was rented or provided to that pedo guy.

Access to that castle is pretty much impossible and there's supposedly a lot of security, cameras, booby traps, etc., to prevent people from sneaking in but I don't know. That family didn't confirm nor deny the allegations made against the castle after that pedo was ousted, which further affirmed the conspiracy theories as fact according to many believers. I don't really believe in this but at the same time I don't reject it.