Search Results: how can i turn him on

for decades, entire generations of boys were raised to be soft, to never stand up for themselves against someone "less privileged" than them, to be as far away from toxic masculinity as possible

then over time everyone and their grandpa can observe women chasing after bad boys, doesn't matter whether they're a godly Christian woman or a hardcore Marxist feminist

you would think with all this complaining about toxic masculinity, that women especially feminists would want nothing to do with it at all

no amount of gaslighting can cover up what everyone can blatantly see with their own eyes, yes there here women complaining about Charlie Kirk being a douchebag while they lust after Hasan Piker who's a far bigger douchebag than Charlie Kirk could ever dream of becoming

the examples there are of this are so overwhelming it's laughable to suggest otherwise. in fact having the appearance of someone toxically masculine is already enough to get women wet

this also further bleeds into politics too with so many examples of far-left women defending the far-right politics of other ethnicities

and in recent years cops have become soft on crime due to feminist policies but you know what happens to soft cops and who's ready to defund these soft cops?

then there's also countless examples in fiction I don't even know where to begin

women falling for toxic masculine men is just a fact at this point

I could post more if not for the 2000 character limits

My take: If you can get FOX & MSNBC to agree in solidarity, then you MUST be wrong Pete.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has imposed new restrictive conditions on media access to the Pentagon, requiring reporters to commit to not acquiring or using any unauthorized information, whether classified or unclassified. Journalists must sign an agreement to this effect or risk losing their press credentials and physical access to the Pentagon. This policy also restricts reporters' movements within the Pentagon, banning access to large areas without official escorts and relocating dedicated workspace for news organizations to undisclosed locations, making it harder for reporters to interact with military personnel. Hegseth's policy demands that any information reported must be preauthorized for release by Pentagon officials, effectively granting the Pentagon editorial control over what journalists can publish. This move has been widely criticized by the Pentagon Press Association and major news outlets—including ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, Fox News, The New York Times, and many others—who see it as a violation of First Amendment rights and an unprecedented attack on press freedom. Almost all media organizations have refused to sign the new rules, and many reporters have turned in their Pentagon press passes in protest.Hegseth defends the restrictions as common-sense measures to safeguard classified information and maintain order, but critics argue this escalates censorship and stifles transparency regarding military affairs. The policy also moves the Pentagon press corps toward an unprecedented absence of mainstream news coverage inside the Pentagon, breaking a tradition that had lasted since the Eisenhower era. Only one right-wing outlet, One America News, has agreed to the new conditions, while nearly all others stand in solidarity against them

NYT today:

American Jews, long Israel’s strongest domestic backers, have turned sharply critical of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing government over the Gaza conflict. A majority believe Israel has committed war crimes as it has killed tens of thousands of civilians and restricted food aid, and four in 10 believe it is guilty of genocide, a new Washington Post survey found — a charge Israel denies. The shift has created new incentives for even moderate Democrats in Congress to get tough on Israel, including by curtailing U. S. military aid.

The damage is also increasingly bipartisan. Despite Republican efforts to identify their party with Israel and to tag Democrats as providing aid and comfort to its enemies, younger evangelical Christians are breaking with their parents on the issue, seeing Israel as an oppressor rather than as a victim. And the breakup extends beyond evangelicals. "Everybody under 30 is against Israel,” the conservative commentator Megyn Kelly offhandedly told Tucker Carlson on his podcast last month.

The question is whether those younger Americans will be lost to Israel long-term — and what Israel’s advocates will do to try to reverse that. Israel’s dependence on U. S. support had become so glaring over the course of the war — in political, military and economic terms — that Israel would be motivated to treat its possible defeat in the court of American public opinion as an “existential threat.”