Search Results: how to fix him

Whenever or whatever I send or ask I get the answer under the ideas of

• 'This shall be your problem'. Mentioning something irrelative.
OR
• 'That's our app and rules'. Might even go explaining some features I already know.. and here to complain about a bug 🤦‍♂️

They could instead just do like any app or website
'Sure, we'll check that and fix it. Thank you for your input'.

Who else feels the same?
~And who is experiencing their opinions being cut at random several times?
I also can't select with/ or use cursor to select as I type this.. just move 😐

Of course private companies can do whatever to attract customers but what of reduced transit fares, museum tickets, library programs, college classes and most important state level TAX FREE social security income.

A History Lesson on the Senior Discount:

Senior discounts originated as both a social and economic strategy. During the Great Depression, seniors were disproportionately poor, prompting the 1935 Social Security Act to provide federal assistance. This established a precedent for viewing seniors as a group needing financial support.

In the 1960s and 1970s, public agencies and businesses began offering discounts to seniors, partly as a social responsibility during the "Great Society" era and partly as a marketing tool to attract older consumers. New York City launched one of the first organized discount programs in 1971. By the 1980s, with a growing senior population, businesses recognized seniors as an affluent and active demographic, using discounts to foster brand loyalty and attract this expanding market.

Today, senior discounts persist due to their effectiveness in appealing to older consumers and their fixed incomes, though debates continue about their relevance given changing economic conditions.

Senior discounts, particularly in the form of tax exemptions or subsidies, can lead to significant lost government revenue. For example, state income tax subsidies for seniors in the U. S. reduce state tax collections by approximately 9%, amounting to $48 billion annually. These subsidies often include exemptions for Social Security income and retirement benefits, even for wealthy seniors, further straining state budgets.

Such revenue losses limit governments' ability to fund essential services like infrastructure, education, and poverty reduction programs. Additionally, these subsidies often shift the tax burden onto younger taxpayers, raising concerns about fairness and generational equity.

Thought this take on Harris's loss was pretty accurate.

"I’m sorry but misogyny is a cop-out answer here. Kamala made a lot of mistakes during her campaign, and the Democratic Party really needs to start taking accountability if they ever want to win again.

First biggest issue: not having a proper democratic primary. Kamala was wildly unpopular in the 2020 primary, to select her as Biden’s VP wasn’t the best idea, and then certainly wasn’t the best candidate to represent the Democratic Party in this election.

Double-downing on Biden’s presidency, which people are already upset about, was a mistake. It made people think she wasn’t going to fix anything.

Not taking a firm stance on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza alienated a lot of voters who are pro-Palestine.

Operating her entire campaign on “I’m not Trump and he will destroy us” instead of running her campaign on hope for the future was a mistake.

Not focusing her campaign on economic policy when millions of Americans are struggling financially was a mistake.

Then a clown like Trump swoops in and starts saying things like “I will make life better for you. I will make America great again” and then suddenly that starts to sound more appealing. Focusing on attacking the other side instead of making your side sound better just doesn’t work. You have to inspire people to vote for you, not tell them why you shouldn’t vote for the other side.

Obama was excellent at inspiring voters to vote for him. He gave them hope of a better future. Kamala should’ve taken notes."